A pre-post quasi-experimental study of the impact of TDM-guided aggressive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment of continuous infusion ceftolozane/tazobactam monotherapy in treating severe Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a strategy useful for raising the bar?

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2025-06-03 DOI:10.1093/jac/dkaf098
Milo Gatti, Matteo Rinaldi, Cecilia Bonazzetti, Antonio Siniscalchi, Tommaso Tonetti, Simone Ambretti, Maddalena Giannella, Pierluigi Viale, Federico Pea
{"title":"A pre-post quasi-experimental study of the impact of TDM-guided aggressive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment of continuous infusion ceftolozane/tazobactam monotherapy in treating severe Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a strategy useful for raising the bar?","authors":"Milo Gatti, Matteo Rinaldi, Cecilia Bonazzetti, Antonio Siniscalchi, Tommaso Tonetti, Simone Ambretti, Maddalena Giannella, Pierluigi Viale, Federico Pea","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the clinical usefulness of a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided strategy for attaining an aggressive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target of continuous infusion (CI) ceftolozane/tazobactam monotherapy in patients having Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a pre-post quasi-experimental study including adult patients with documented P. aeruginosa bacteraemia and/or pneumonia who were treated with CI ceftolozane/tazobactam monotherapy tailored by means of a TDM-guided strategy in the period 1 November 2023 to 31 July 2024 (post-intervention phase) compared with patients receiving standard management with CI ceftolozane/tazobactam monotherapy in the period 1 April 2022 to 31 October 2023 (pre-intervention phase). Clinical outcomes were compared between pre- and post-intervention phase. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for identifying variables associated with microbiological failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-five patients (48 in pre- and 37 in post-intervention phase) were included. Demographics and clinical features were similar in both groups. No significant difference emerged between groups in terms of microbiological eradication (P = 0.10), 30 day resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam (P = 0.37), clinical cure (P = 0.26) and 30 day mortality rate (P = 0.79). All patients in the post-intervention phase attained an optimal PK/PD target, allowing the use of a lower ceftolozane/tazobactam CI daily dosing regimen compared with the pre-intervention phase (3.0 g/1.5 g versus 6.0 g/3.0 g; P = 0.06). The only independent predictors of microbiological failure were difficult-to-treat resistant P. aeruginosa isolates in the pre-intervention group (OR 6.99; 95% CI 1.34-36.55), and a ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of oxygen in the inhaled air (Pao2/Fio2 ratio) <200 in the post-intervention group (OR 18.00; 95% CI 1.86-174.22).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our TDM-guided strategy of CI ceftolozane/tazobactam was cost-effective in attaining an aggressive PK/PD target of ceftolozane against susceptible P. aeruginosa strains with lower than standard daily doses without compromising efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1543-1551"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12129583/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf098","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the clinical usefulness of a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided strategy for attaining an aggressive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target of continuous infusion (CI) ceftolozane/tazobactam monotherapy in patients having Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.

Methods: We performed a pre-post quasi-experimental study including adult patients with documented P. aeruginosa bacteraemia and/or pneumonia who were treated with CI ceftolozane/tazobactam monotherapy tailored by means of a TDM-guided strategy in the period 1 November 2023 to 31 July 2024 (post-intervention phase) compared with patients receiving standard management with CI ceftolozane/tazobactam monotherapy in the period 1 April 2022 to 31 October 2023 (pre-intervention phase). Clinical outcomes were compared between pre- and post-intervention phase. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for identifying variables associated with microbiological failure.

Results: Eighty-five patients (48 in pre- and 37 in post-intervention phase) were included. Demographics and clinical features were similar in both groups. No significant difference emerged between groups in terms of microbiological eradication (P = 0.10), 30 day resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam (P = 0.37), clinical cure (P = 0.26) and 30 day mortality rate (P = 0.79). All patients in the post-intervention phase attained an optimal PK/PD target, allowing the use of a lower ceftolozane/tazobactam CI daily dosing regimen compared with the pre-intervention phase (3.0 g/1.5 g versus 6.0 g/3.0 g; P = 0.06). The only independent predictors of microbiological failure were difficult-to-treat resistant P. aeruginosa isolates in the pre-intervention group (OR 6.99; 95% CI 1.34-36.55), and a ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of oxygen in the inhaled air (Pao2/Fio2 ratio) <200 in the post-intervention group (OR 18.00; 95% CI 1.86-174.22).

Conclusions: Our TDM-guided strategy of CI ceftolozane/tazobactam was cost-effective in attaining an aggressive PK/PD target of ceftolozane against susceptible P. aeruginosa strains with lower than standard daily doses without compromising efficacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项tdm引导下持续输注头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦单药治疗严重铜绿假单胞菌感染的侵袭性药代动力学/药效学目标实现的准实验前后研究:一种有助于提高标准的策略?
目的:评估治疗性药物监测(TDM)指导策略在铜绿假单胞菌感染患者中实现持续输注(CI)头孢氧唑烷/他唑巴坦单药治疗的积极药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)目标的临床有效性。方法:我们进行了一项预-后准实验研究,包括在2023年11月1日至2024年7月31日(干预后阶段)期间接受经tdm指导的CI头孢氧唑/他唑巴坦单药治疗的铜绿假单胞菌菌血症和/或肺炎的成年患者,与在2022年4月1日至2023年10月31日(干预前阶段)期间接受标准管理的CI头孢氧唑/他唑巴坦单药治疗的患者进行比较。比较干预前后的临床结果。进行单变量和多变量分析以确定与微生物失败相关的变量。结果:纳入85例患者(干预前48例,干预后37例)。两组患者的人口统计学和临床特征相似。在微生物根除(P = 0.10)、30天对头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦耐药(P = 0.37)、临床治愈率(P = 0.26)和30天死亡率(P = 0.79)方面,两组间无显著差异。干预后阶段的所有患者均达到了最佳的PK/PD目标,与干预前阶段相比,允许使用较低的头孢唑烷/他唑巴坦CI日给药方案(3.0 g/1.5 g vs 6.0 g/3.0 g;p = 0.06)。微生物学失败的唯一独立预测因子是干预前组难以治疗的耐药铜绿假单胞菌(OR 6.99;结论:我们的tdm指导下的CI头孢托ozane/他唑巴坦策略,在低于标准日剂量的情况下,在不影响疗效的情况下,实现了头孢托ozane对铜绿假单胞菌敏感菌株的积极的PK/PD目标,具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
期刊最新文献
Beyond the Algorithm: Reframing Biomarker-Guided Antibiotic Stewardship with Behavioural Insights. Insights from the WHO Tricycle-aligned Fleming Fund EQASIA External Quality Assessment (EQA) programme detecting ESBL-, AmpC- and carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli in South and South-East Asia. Optimizing cloxacillin prophylaxis in hip and knee arthroplasty based on population pharmacokinetics of unbound plasma concentrations. The tissue distribution and pharmacokinetics of [14C]-olorofim following intravenous dosing in the rat. The plasma and intracellular exposure of intramuscularly administered long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine in people with HIV.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1