Comparison of the Predictive Value of Neutrophil Percentage-to-Albumin Ratio and Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score for the Risk of Stroke-Associated Pneumonia Among Stroke Patients.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of General Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S504231
Zhu Tian, Yufeng Lin, Yang Song, Chi Zhang, Zhiyun Wang
{"title":"Comparison of the Predictive Value of Neutrophil Percentage-to-Albumin Ratio and Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score for the Risk of Stroke-Associated Pneumonia Among Stroke Patients.","authors":"Zhu Tian, Yufeng Lin, Yang Song, Chi Zhang, Zhiyun Wang","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S504231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the predicting value of neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR) and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) for Stroke-Associated Pneumonia (SAP) occurrence among stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited stroke patients (aged 18 years) hospitalized at Tianjin First Central Hospital from January 2022 to February 2023 for this retrospective cohort study. NPAR was categorized into four groups by considering the quartiles: Q1 (<1.38), Q2 (≥1.38 and <1.62), Q3 (≥1.62 and <1.87), Q4 (≥1.87). SAP incident was the primary outcome in this study. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were employed to explore the association between NPAR, mGPS and SAP occurrence among individuals with stroke. Besides, we compared the predicting value of NPAR and mGPS for SAP occurrence by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study encompassed 851 patients with stroke. One hundred and forty-seven patients (17.27%) developed SAP. After accounting for confounding factors, we observed significant positive association of high NPAR with SAP occurrence [(for the third quartile: odds ratio (OR)=2.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-5.47; for the fourth quartile: OR=3.35, 95% CI: 1.44-7.77)]. Additionally, the results also indicated that mGPS 1 (OR=2.26, 95% CI: 1.25-4.08) and mGPS 2 (OR=7.37, 95% CI: 2.63-20.70) were related to the increased probability of SAP, respectively. ROC analysis demonstrated that both the NPAR [area under the curve (AUC)=0.729, 95% CI: 0.687-0.771] and mGPS (AUC=0.671, 95% CI: 0.627-0.716) exhibited good predictive power for SAP occurrence. Based on the DeLong test, the predictive value of NPAR for SAP may be significantly superior to that of mGPS (<i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that both NPAR and mGPS serve as reliable biomarker for assessing SAP risk in stroke patients, with NPAR demonstrating superior predictive value for SAP compared to mGPS.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":"18 ","pages":"1605-1614"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11930245/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S504231","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the predicting value of neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR) and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) for Stroke-Associated Pneumonia (SAP) occurrence among stroke patients.

Methods: We recruited stroke patients (aged 18 years) hospitalized at Tianjin First Central Hospital from January 2022 to February 2023 for this retrospective cohort study. NPAR was categorized into four groups by considering the quartiles: Q1 (<1.38), Q2 (≥1.38 and <1.62), Q3 (≥1.62 and <1.87), Q4 (≥1.87). SAP incident was the primary outcome in this study. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were employed to explore the association between NPAR, mGPS and SAP occurrence among individuals with stroke. Besides, we compared the predicting value of NPAR and mGPS for SAP occurrence by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results: Our study encompassed 851 patients with stroke. One hundred and forty-seven patients (17.27%) developed SAP. After accounting for confounding factors, we observed significant positive association of high NPAR with SAP occurrence [(for the third quartile: odds ratio (OR)=2.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-5.47; for the fourth quartile: OR=3.35, 95% CI: 1.44-7.77)]. Additionally, the results also indicated that mGPS 1 (OR=2.26, 95% CI: 1.25-4.08) and mGPS 2 (OR=7.37, 95% CI: 2.63-20.70) were related to the increased probability of SAP, respectively. ROC analysis demonstrated that both the NPAR [area under the curve (AUC)=0.729, 95% CI: 0.687-0.771] and mGPS (AUC=0.671, 95% CI: 0.627-0.716) exhibited good predictive power for SAP occurrence. Based on the DeLong test, the predictive value of NPAR for SAP may be significantly superior to that of mGPS (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that both NPAR and mGPS serve as reliable biomarker for assessing SAP risk in stroke patients, with NPAR demonstrating superior predictive value for SAP compared to mGPS.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中性粒细胞百分比-白蛋白比和改良格拉斯哥预后评分对脑卒中患者发生脑卒中相关肺炎风险的预测价值比较
目的:探讨中性粒细胞百分比-白蛋白比(NPAR)和改良格拉斯哥预后评分(mGPS)对脑卒中患者卒中相关性肺炎(SAP)发生的预测价值。方法:我们招募2022年1月至2023年2月在天津市第一中心医院住院的脑卒中患者(18岁)进行回顾性队列研究。根据四分位数将NPAR分为四组:Q1(结果:我们的研究包括851例脑卒中患者。147例患者(17.27%)发生SAP。在考虑混杂因素后,我们观察到高NPAR与SAP发生显著正相关[(对于第三个四分位数:优势比(OR)=2.35, 95%可信区间(CI): 1.01-5.47;第四个四分位数:OR=3.35, 95% CI: 1.44-7.77)]。此外,结果还表明mGPS 1 (OR=2.26, 95% CI: 1.25-4.08)和mGPS 2 (OR=7.37, 95% CI: 2.63-20.70)分别与SAP发生率增加有关。ROC分析表明,NPAR[曲线下面积(AUC)=0.729, 95% CI: 0.687-0.771]和mGPS (AUC=0.671, 95% CI: 0.627-0.716)对SAP的发生均具有较好的预测能力。结论:NPAR和mGPS均可作为评估脑卒中患者SAP风险的可靠生物标志物,其中NPAR对SAP的预测价值优于mGPS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of General Medicine
International Journal of General Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas. A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
期刊最新文献
Association of Dynamic Changes in the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio with Mortality in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Anxiolytic Effects of Acanthopanax senticosus-Schisandra chinensis Combination: Mechanistic Insights via HPA and Neuroinflammatory Modulation. Banxia-Baizhu-Tianma Decoction Combined with Acupuncture for Cerebral Ischemic Stroke: A Narrative Review. Apolipoprotein B/A1 Ratio for Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Coronary Artery Disease: Development and Validation of a Nomogram. Fasting and Fasting-Mimicking Diets as Adjunctive Strategies in Cancer Therapy: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Clinical Implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1