Investigation of return-to-sport criteria based on the results of the single-leg standing-up test.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-23 DOI:10.1177/10538127251314027
Koichi Kamiike, Akira Sakaguchi, Rui Tsukagoshi, Masami Hidaka, Kotaro Kawaguchi
{"title":"Investigation of return-to-sport criteria based on the results of the single-leg standing-up test.","authors":"Koichi Kamiike, Akira Sakaguchi, Rui Tsukagoshi, Masami Hidaka, Kotaro Kawaguchi","doi":"10.1177/10538127251314027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction typically requires a hamstring-to-quadriceps muscle strength ratio (H/Q ratio) of at least 55% for safe return to sports, as measured via isokinetic dynamometry. The single-leg standing-up (SLS) test is sometimes used to assess lower extremity strength. Establishing SLS as a return-to-sport criterion may provide a clinically accessible alternative.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate whether SLS performance could serve as an alternative return-to-sports criterion.MethodsEighty-five patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were enrolled in this study. Knee extension and flexion strengths were assessed to calculate the H/Q ratio. SLS was initiated at a height of 30 cm, with the height reduced by 10 cm per attempt until success. The participants were categorized according to their maximum height and knee strengths, and H/Q ratios were compared.ResultsKnee extension strength did not vary significantly across the groups; however, knee flexion strength and H/Q ratio showed notable differences. The participants who completed SLS from 20 cm demonstrated an H/Q ratio of 55% or higher, meeting the threshold for sports resumption.ConclusionThese results indicate that achieving SLS from a 20 cm height may be a feasible criterion to assess readiness for sports resumption after ACL reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"739-744"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251314027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction typically requires a hamstring-to-quadriceps muscle strength ratio (H/Q ratio) of at least 55% for safe return to sports, as measured via isokinetic dynamometry. The single-leg standing-up (SLS) test is sometimes used to assess lower extremity strength. Establishing SLS as a return-to-sport criterion may provide a clinically accessible alternative.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate whether SLS performance could serve as an alternative return-to-sports criterion.MethodsEighty-five patients who underwent ACL reconstruction were enrolled in this study. Knee extension and flexion strengths were assessed to calculate the H/Q ratio. SLS was initiated at a height of 30 cm, with the height reduced by 10 cm per attempt until success. The participants were categorized according to their maximum height and knee strengths, and H/Q ratios were compared.ResultsKnee extension strength did not vary significantly across the groups; however, knee flexion strength and H/Q ratio showed notable differences. The participants who completed SLS from 20 cm demonstrated an H/Q ratio of 55% or higher, meeting the threshold for sports resumption.ConclusionThese results indicate that achieving SLS from a 20 cm height may be a feasible criterion to assess readiness for sports resumption after ACL reconstruction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于单腿站立测试结果的恢复运动标准的调查。
背景:前交叉韧带(ACL)重建通常需要腘绳肌与股四头肌的力量比(H/Q比)至少达到55%才能安全恢复运动,这是通过等速动力学测量得到的。单腿站立(SLS)试验有时用于评估下肢力量。建立SLS作为恢复运动的标准可能提供一个临床可行的替代方案。目的本研究旨在评估SLS表现是否可以作为另一种回归运动的标准。方法对85例ACL重建患者进行研究。评估膝关节伸展和屈曲强度以计算H/Q比。SLS从30厘米的高度开始,每次尝试降低10厘米的高度,直到成功。参与者根据他们的最大身高和膝盖力量进行分类,并比较了H/Q比。结果各组间伸展强度差异不显著;然而,膝关节屈曲强度和H/Q比存在显著差异。从20厘米开始完成SLS的参与者的H/Q比达到55%或更高,达到了恢复运动的门槛。结论从20 cm高度达到SLS可能是评估前交叉韧带重建后运动恢复准备情况的可行标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
期刊最新文献
Is force control altered in patients with chronic low back pain? A systematic review. Investigation of kinesiophobia, physical activity, quality of life, depression and anxiety level in adult people with hemophilia: A frequency-matched case-control study. Examination of anterior cruciate ligament injuries and genetic relationship: A systematic study. Can AI chatbots guide patients and physicians about neck pain? A reliability and readability comparison of ChatGPT-4 and Gemini. Critical comments on ultrasound-guided paravertebral oxygen-ozone injections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1