Efficacy of anal botulinum toxin injection in children with functional constipation.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1002/jpn3.70040
Dhiren Patel, Pavithra Saikumar, Mayuri Jayaraman, Chaitri Desai, John Rosen, Leonel Rodriguez
{"title":"Efficacy of anal botulinum toxin injection in children with functional constipation.","authors":"Dhiren Patel, Pavithra Saikumar, Mayuri Jayaraman, Chaitri Desai, John Rosen, Leonel Rodriguez","doi":"10.1002/jpn3.70040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Functional constipation (FC) is a common diagnosis in the pediatric age group. In addition to laxative regimens and behavioral interventions, some have reported the use of anal botulinum toxin (BTX) injections to treat FC, with limited data regarding its efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective, multicenter study including patients who received BTX for FC refractory to medical therapy. Demographic data, results of anorectal manometry, and BTX data (number of sessions, dose, and side effects) were collected. Patients were divided into three groups based on the indication for BTX: group 1 (FC with FI [fecal incontinence]), group 2 (FC without FI), and group 3 (FI alone). Response to therapy was assessed for whole cohort and for each group based on improvement in weekly frequency of BM (bowel movements) to 3 or more per week and/or resolution of FI. We also compared the response to therapy to the parental and provider report.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 63 patients were included in the study. Median age was 6.4 years and 32 (51%) were female. The median dose of BTX was 100 units, and most patients (55/63) received a single BTX injection. Medical therapy was continued after BTX injections in most patients (60/63 or 95%). After BTX, the frequency of BM increased to >3/week in 29/56 (52%) and FI improved in 8/47 (17%) for the whole cohort. We observed a response rate of 10% in group 1, 50% in group 2 and 14% in group 3. No factors (age, gender, anal resting pressure) were associated with BTX response except for prolonged time of therapy before BTX and shorter median follow up after BTX. Parents/primary provider reported improvement in 44/63 (70%) after BTX, which was significantly higher than the actual observed response to therapy (70% vs. 21%, p = 0.003, kappa = 0.202). We found no association between response to BTX and presence of developmental delay and/or behavioral disorders (p = 0.531). Side effects were minimal and noted in seven (11%) patients, mainly FI. No factors were associated with the development of side effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anal BTX injections improved BM frequency with minimal effect on FI with an overall symptom resolution in 21% of patients. BTX does not seem to have a notable effect in patients with FC and developmental delay and/or behavioral disorders. Provider and parental reported success were significantly higher than the actual observed response.</p>","PeriodicalId":16694,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"956-962"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpn3.70040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Functional constipation (FC) is a common diagnosis in the pediatric age group. In addition to laxative regimens and behavioral interventions, some have reported the use of anal botulinum toxin (BTX) injections to treat FC, with limited data regarding its efficacy.

Methods: This is a retrospective, multicenter study including patients who received BTX for FC refractory to medical therapy. Demographic data, results of anorectal manometry, and BTX data (number of sessions, dose, and side effects) were collected. Patients were divided into three groups based on the indication for BTX: group 1 (FC with FI [fecal incontinence]), group 2 (FC without FI), and group 3 (FI alone). Response to therapy was assessed for whole cohort and for each group based on improvement in weekly frequency of BM (bowel movements) to 3 or more per week and/or resolution of FI. We also compared the response to therapy to the parental and provider report.

Results: A total of 63 patients were included in the study. Median age was 6.4 years and 32 (51%) were female. The median dose of BTX was 100 units, and most patients (55/63) received a single BTX injection. Medical therapy was continued after BTX injections in most patients (60/63 or 95%). After BTX, the frequency of BM increased to >3/week in 29/56 (52%) and FI improved in 8/47 (17%) for the whole cohort. We observed a response rate of 10% in group 1, 50% in group 2 and 14% in group 3. No factors (age, gender, anal resting pressure) were associated with BTX response except for prolonged time of therapy before BTX and shorter median follow up after BTX. Parents/primary provider reported improvement in 44/63 (70%) after BTX, which was significantly higher than the actual observed response to therapy (70% vs. 21%, p = 0.003, kappa = 0.202). We found no association between response to BTX and presence of developmental delay and/or behavioral disorders (p = 0.531). Side effects were minimal and noted in seven (11%) patients, mainly FI. No factors were associated with the development of side effects.

Conclusions: Anal BTX injections improved BM frequency with minimal effect on FI with an overall symptom resolution in 21% of patients. BTX does not seem to have a notable effect in patients with FC and developmental delay and/or behavioral disorders. Provider and parental reported success were significantly higher than the actual observed response.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肛门注射肉毒杆菌毒素治疗小儿功能性便秘疗效观察。
目的:功能性便秘(FC)是儿科年龄组的常见诊断。除了通便方案和行为干预外,一些报道使用肛门肉毒杆菌毒素(BTX)注射治疗FC,但有关其疗效的数据有限。方法:这是一项回顾性、多中心研究,包括接受BTX治疗的FC难治性患者。收集人口统计数据、肛肠测压结果和BTX数据(疗程数、剂量和副作用)。根据BTX的适应症将患者分为三组:1组(FC合并FI[大便失禁]),2组(FC不伴有FI)和3组(单独FI)。对整个队列和每组的治疗反应进行评估,基于每周BM(肠蠕动)频率改善到每周3次或更多和/或FI的缓解。我们还比较了对治疗的反应与父母和提供者的报告。结果:共纳入63例患者。中位年龄6.4岁,女性32例(51%)。BTX的中位剂量为100单位,大多数患者(55/63)接受单次BTX注射。大多数患者(60/63或95%)在注射BTX后继续药物治疗。在BTX后,整个队列中29/56(52%)的BM频率增加到bb3 /周,8/47(17%)的FI改善。第1组有效率为10%,第2组有效率为50%,第3组有效率为14%。除BTX前治疗时间延长和BTX后中位随访时间缩短外,其他因素(年龄、性别、肛门静息压力)与BTX反应无关。父母/主要提供者在BTX后报告了44/63(70%)的改善,显著高于实际观察到的治疗反应(70% vs 21%, p = 0.003, kappa = 0.202)。我们发现对BTX的反应与发育迟缓和/或行为障碍之间没有关联(p = 0.531)。7例(11%)患者的副作用很小,主要是FI。没有任何因素与副作用的发生有关。结论:肛门BTX注射改善了BM频率,对FI的影响最小,21%的患者的总体症状得到缓解。BTX似乎对FC和发育迟缓和/或行为障碍患者没有显著影响。提供者和家长报告的成功率明显高于实际观察到的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.80%
发文量
467
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (JPGN) provides a forum for original papers and reviews dealing with pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, including normal and abnormal functions of the alimentary tract and its associated organs, including the salivary glands, pancreas, gallbladder, and liver. Particular emphasis is on development and its relation to infant and childhood nutrition.
期刊最新文献
Neurodevelopmental assessment at 24 months in infants with esophageal atresia: A prospective cohort study. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal duplication cyst in a 3-year-old child. Quality of life for pediatric patients with short bowel syndrome-associated intestinal failure treated with teduglutide. Children and adolescents with disorders of gut-brain interaction with comorbid hypermobility and orthostatic intolerance have worse outcomes. Predicting pediatric inflammatory bowel disease remission utilizing a clinical decision support tool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1