Development of a Reporting Guideline for Trochim's Concept Mapping.

IF 2 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Methods and Protocols Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.3390/mps8020024
Sandesh Pantha, Martin Jones, Richard Gray
{"title":"Development of a Reporting Guideline for Trochim's Concept Mapping.","authors":"Sandesh Pantha, Martin Jones, Richard Gray","doi":"10.3390/mps8020024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reporting guidelines are created with the intention to enhance the quality and transparency of reporting different research methods. Trochim's concept mapping (often referred to as group concept mapping) is a six-phase, participatory mixed-method approach to understanding complex constructs. Currently, there is no reporting guideline for concept mapping. Developing a reporting guideline typically follows a three-step process: 1. a systematic review to establish the need for a reporting guideline, 2. a Delphi study to identify candidate items, and 3. consolidation process to inform a draft guideline. We have previously reported our step 1, a systematic review of health-related concept mapping studies. In this paper, we report on steps 2 and 3, guideline development. In developing our reporting guideline, we opted to use concept mapping rather than the Delphi method. Stakeholders including researchers and experts in concept mapping were identified from papers included in our systematic review and invited to participate. Thirty-two stakeholders participated in the brainstorming phase of the concept mapping generating 96 discrete statements. The prioritisation and clustering phase involved 24 stakeholders. The final concept map included 11 clusters that represented key concepts for inclusion in the reporting guideline. The clusters were relatively small and positioned in a circle around the edge of the map, suggesting each was of equal importance and conceptually discreet. In phase 3, a guideline was drafted using the findings from both the phase 1 systematic review and phase 2 concept mapping study. The draft was reviewed by eight stakeholders (who had participated in our phase 2 concept mapping study) to check the completeness and clarity of expression of the items included in the guideline. The final reporting guideline (called the ConMapT) has 27-items organised under 14 headings. The guideline will be made freely available via the EQUATOR network. Registration: The study protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF) before recruiting the first study participant. The EQUATOR network has listed the study as a guideline under development.</p>","PeriodicalId":18715,"journal":{"name":"Methods and Protocols","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods and Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/mps8020024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reporting guidelines are created with the intention to enhance the quality and transparency of reporting different research methods. Trochim's concept mapping (often referred to as group concept mapping) is a six-phase, participatory mixed-method approach to understanding complex constructs. Currently, there is no reporting guideline for concept mapping. Developing a reporting guideline typically follows a three-step process: 1. a systematic review to establish the need for a reporting guideline, 2. a Delphi study to identify candidate items, and 3. consolidation process to inform a draft guideline. We have previously reported our step 1, a systematic review of health-related concept mapping studies. In this paper, we report on steps 2 and 3, guideline development. In developing our reporting guideline, we opted to use concept mapping rather than the Delphi method. Stakeholders including researchers and experts in concept mapping were identified from papers included in our systematic review and invited to participate. Thirty-two stakeholders participated in the brainstorming phase of the concept mapping generating 96 discrete statements. The prioritisation and clustering phase involved 24 stakeholders. The final concept map included 11 clusters that represented key concepts for inclusion in the reporting guideline. The clusters were relatively small and positioned in a circle around the edge of the map, suggesting each was of equal importance and conceptually discreet. In phase 3, a guideline was drafted using the findings from both the phase 1 systematic review and phase 2 concept mapping study. The draft was reviewed by eight stakeholders (who had participated in our phase 2 concept mapping study) to check the completeness and clarity of expression of the items included in the guideline. The final reporting guideline (called the ConMapT) has 27-items organised under 14 headings. The guideline will be made freely available via the EQUATOR network. Registration: The study protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF) before recruiting the first study participant. The EQUATOR network has listed the study as a guideline under development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trochim概念图报告指南的制定。
制定报告准则的目的是提高报告不同研究方法的质量和透明度。Trochim的概念映射(通常称为组概念映射)是一种六阶段、参与式混合方法,用于理解复杂结构。目前,还没有概念映射的报告指南。制定报告指南通常需要三个步骤:1 .进行系统审查,以确定报告准则的必要性。2 .进行德尔菲研究以确定候选项目;合并过程通知指南草案。我们之前报道过我们的第一步,健康相关概念图研究的系统回顾。在本文中,我们报告了步骤2和步骤3,指南的制定。在制定报告指南时,我们选择使用概念图而不是德尔菲法。包括研究人员和概念图专家在内的利益相关者从我们系统综述中的论文中确定并邀请他们参加。32个利益相关者参与了概念图的头脑风暴阶段,产生了96个独立的陈述。优先排序和集群阶段涉及24个利益相关者。最后的概念图包括11组,它们代表了要纳入报告准则的关键概念。这些集群相对较小,位于地图边缘的一个圆圈中,表明每个集群都同等重要,并且在概念上是谨慎的。在第三阶段,根据第一阶段系统评价和第二阶段概念图研究的结果起草了指南。该草案由8个利益相关者(他们参与了我们的第二阶段概念图研究)审查,以检查指南中包含的项目表达的完整性和清晰度。最终的报告指南(称为ConMapT)有27个项目,分为14个标题。该准则将通过赤道网络免费提供。注册:在招募第一个研究参与者之前,研究方案已在开放科学框架(OSF)注册。EQUATOR网络已将这项研究列为正在制定的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Methods and Protocols
Methods and Protocols Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Streamlined In Vitro mRNA Production Evaluation for mRNA-Based Vaccines and Therapeutics. Does the Selected Segment Within a Two-Legged Hopping Trial Alter Leg Stiffness and Kinetic Performance Values and Their Variability? Study Protocol for Genomic Epidemiology Investigation of Intensive Care Unit Patient Colonization by Antimicrobial-Resistant ESKAPE Pathogens. New Approach for Targeting Small-Molecule Candidates for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins. Adaptation of the Motivational Interviewing Skills Code to Identify Client Language Predicting Reduced Opioid Use Risk and Increased Use of Alternative Pain Care Strategies in Veterans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1