Case-matched Comparison of Outcomes Following Neonatal Mucous Fistula Refeeding: 13-year Institutional Review

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Journal of pediatric surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162276
Goeto Dantes , Swathi Raikot , Caroline Chivily , Benjamin Herron , Lauriane Pinto , Zhulin He , Laura M. Johnson , Megan Bouchard , Megan Durham , Gregory Sysyn , Anthony Piazza , Hanna Alemayehu
{"title":"Case-matched Comparison of Outcomes Following Neonatal Mucous Fistula Refeeding: 13-year Institutional Review","authors":"Goeto Dantes ,&nbsp;Swathi Raikot ,&nbsp;Caroline Chivily ,&nbsp;Benjamin Herron ,&nbsp;Lauriane Pinto ,&nbsp;Zhulin He ,&nbsp;Laura M. Johnson ,&nbsp;Megan Bouchard ,&nbsp;Megan Durham ,&nbsp;Gregory Sysyn ,&nbsp;Anthony Piazza ,&nbsp;Hanna Alemayehu","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Refeeding ostomy effluent into the residual bowel via the mucus fistula (MFR) has been associated with decreased parenteral nutrition needs and decreased cholestasis. However, MFR is also associated with risks and the literature is not definitive. We performed a case matched comparison of neonates treated with and without MFR.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All neonates who underwent enteral diversion between 2010 and 2023 were identified. Neonates who received MFR were propensity score matched with non-MFR neonates. Primary objectives included cholestasis and ability to achieve full feeds prior to enterostomy closure (EC). We also evaluated MFR complications (perforation, ostomy stricture, leak or prolapse).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>262 neonates were case matched (131 MFR and 131 non-MFR). Age, height, and weight on admission were comparable. We found no difference in ability to achieve full feeds prior to EC. MFR neonates did have a lower incidence of cholestasis (p &lt; 0.001). Complications occurred in 24 (18 %) of MFR neonates and abdominal reoperations prior to EC occurred more frequently in MFR (18 %) vs non-MFR (6.9 %) neonates, odds ratio 3.21 (1.44, 7.61).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>MFR is an important tool in the postoperative management of diverted neonates. However, when critically analyzed via statistical case matching, our study shows that the benefits may be more nuanced.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level III.</div></div><div><h3>Study Type</h3><div>Retrospective Chart Review.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":"60 6","pages":"Article 162276"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022346825001216","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Refeeding ostomy effluent into the residual bowel via the mucus fistula (MFR) has been associated with decreased parenteral nutrition needs and decreased cholestasis. However, MFR is also associated with risks and the literature is not definitive. We performed a case matched comparison of neonates treated with and without MFR.

Methods

All neonates who underwent enteral diversion between 2010 and 2023 were identified. Neonates who received MFR were propensity score matched with non-MFR neonates. Primary objectives included cholestasis and ability to achieve full feeds prior to enterostomy closure (EC). We also evaluated MFR complications (perforation, ostomy stricture, leak or prolapse).

Results

262 neonates were case matched (131 MFR and 131 non-MFR). Age, height, and weight on admission were comparable. We found no difference in ability to achieve full feeds prior to EC. MFR neonates did have a lower incidence of cholestasis (p < 0.001). Complications occurred in 24 (18 %) of MFR neonates and abdominal reoperations prior to EC occurred more frequently in MFR (18 %) vs non-MFR (6.9 %) neonates, odds ratio 3.21 (1.44, 7.61).

Conclusion

MFR is an important tool in the postoperative management of diverted neonates. However, when critically analyzed via statistical case matching, our study shows that the benefits may be more nuanced.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

Study Type

Retrospective Chart Review.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿粘膜瘘再喂养的病例对照比较:13年机构回顾。
背景:通过黏液瘘管(MFR)将造口出水重新喂入残肠与减少肠外营养需求和减少胆汁淤积有关。然而,MFR也与风险有关,而且文献并不确定。我们对接受和未接受MFR治疗的新生儿进行了病例匹配比较。方法:选取2010-2023年间所有接受肠内转流的新生儿。接受MFR的新生儿倾向评分与未接受MFR的新生儿相匹配。主要目的包括在肠造口关闭(EC)之前实现胆汁淤积和充分喂养的能力。我们还评估了MFR并发症(穿孔、造口狭窄、渗漏或脱垂)。结果:262例新生儿病例匹配(MFR 131例,非MFR 131例)。入院时年龄、身高和体重具有可比性。我们发现在EC之前实现全饲料的能力没有差异。结论:MFR是分流新生儿术后处理的重要工具。然而,当通过统计案例匹配进行批判性分析时,我们的研究表明,这些好处可能更加微妙。证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
569
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.
期刊最新文献
Robotic surgery for pancreatic disorders in children: insights from two centers. Standardized Prospective Multidisciplinary Follow-Up of Patients with Surgical Congenital Malformations: A Model for Continuous Data Driven Improvement of Health Care. Inverted V-I MeatoGlanuloplasty (IV-IMG): twenty years' experience with a new technique for distal hypospadias repair. A randomized control trial for assessing virtual reality for perioperative anxiolysis and postoperative pain modulation in adolescents undergoing MIRPE. Antegrade continence enema treatment can lead to proximal colonic dilation while preserving motility in children with constipation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1