The optimal timing for initiating oral anticoagulant in ischemic stroke combined with non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients: A real-world big data analysis
Wenxuan Lv , Xiangxiang Qi , Xiaolan Xu , Yongqing Wang , Jun Liao
{"title":"The optimal timing for initiating oral anticoagulant in ischemic stroke combined with non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients: A real-world big data analysis","authors":"Wenxuan Lv , Xiangxiang Qi , Xiaolan Xu , Yongqing Wang , Jun Liao","doi":"10.1016/j.neurot.2025.e00574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Oral anticoagulants (OAC) are essential in preventing stroke recurrence in patients with ischemic stroke (IS) and non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), though they carry a bleeding risk. Balancing the benefits and risks of anticoagulant therapy and determining the optimal timing for initiation are critical. This real-world study investigated optimal timing for OAC initiation post-IS and evaluated drug selection using data from the National Health and Medical Big Data (Eastern) Center, covering IS records from 1564 hospitals in Jiangsu (2018–2021). Using 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox model analysis, we compared outcomes between OAC initiators and non-initiators at different time points. Results showed that initiating OAC within 3 days for mild IS (HR, 0.82 [95 % CI, 0.71–0.94, p = 0.024]), within 6 days for moderate IS (HR, 0.76 [95 % CI, 0.65–0.89, p = 0.004]), and within 11 days for severe IS (HR, 0.89 [95 % CI, 0.78–0.97, p = 0.032]) was associated with better outcomes. New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) demonstrated favorable effectiveness and safety profiles compared to warfarin, without increasing bleeding risk (HR, 0.85 [95 % CI, 0.73–0.98, p = 0.038]). Based on these observational findings, we suggest considering early NOAC initiation for mild and moderate IS, while carefully assessing stroke progression and bleeding risk before anticoagulation in severe IS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19159,"journal":{"name":"Neurotherapeutics","volume":"22 4","pages":"Article e00574"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878747925000522","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Oral anticoagulants (OAC) are essential in preventing stroke recurrence in patients with ischemic stroke (IS) and non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), though they carry a bleeding risk. Balancing the benefits and risks of anticoagulant therapy and determining the optimal timing for initiation are critical. This real-world study investigated optimal timing for OAC initiation post-IS and evaluated drug selection using data from the National Health and Medical Big Data (Eastern) Center, covering IS records from 1564 hospitals in Jiangsu (2018–2021). Using 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox model analysis, we compared outcomes between OAC initiators and non-initiators at different time points. Results showed that initiating OAC within 3 days for mild IS (HR, 0.82 [95 % CI, 0.71–0.94, p = 0.024]), within 6 days for moderate IS (HR, 0.76 [95 % CI, 0.65–0.89, p = 0.004]), and within 11 days for severe IS (HR, 0.89 [95 % CI, 0.78–0.97, p = 0.032]) was associated with better outcomes. New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) demonstrated favorable effectiveness and safety profiles compared to warfarin, without increasing bleeding risk (HR, 0.85 [95 % CI, 0.73–0.98, p = 0.038]). Based on these observational findings, we suggest considering early NOAC initiation for mild and moderate IS, while carefully assessing stroke progression and bleeding risk before anticoagulation in severe IS.
期刊介绍:
Neurotherapeutics® is the journal of the American Society for Experimental Neurotherapeutics (ASENT). Each issue provides critical reviews of an important topic relating to the treatment of neurological disorders written by international authorities.
The Journal also publishes original research articles in translational neuroscience including descriptions of cutting edge therapies that cross disciplinary lines and represent important contributions to neurotherapeutics for medical practitioners and other researchers in the field.
Neurotherapeutics ® delivers a multidisciplinary perspective on the frontiers of translational neuroscience, provides perspectives on current research and practice, and covers social and ethical as well as scientific issues.