Effect of left bundle branch block on maximal functional capacity in asymptomatic individuals without structural heart disease

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Revista española de cardiología (English ed.) Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1016/j.rec.2025.03.001
Patricia Palau , Eloy Domínguez , Silvia Mínguez , Gonzalo Núñez , Enrique Santas , Celia García-Conejo , Iván de Amo , Paloma Marín , Cristina Flor , Laura López , Lucía Ortega , Isabel Gabaldón-Sánchez , Rafael de la Espriella , Juan Sanchis , Julio Núñez
{"title":"Effect of left bundle branch block on maximal functional capacity in asymptomatic individuals without structural heart disease","authors":"Patricia Palau ,&nbsp;Eloy Domínguez ,&nbsp;Silvia Mínguez ,&nbsp;Gonzalo Núñez ,&nbsp;Enrique Santas ,&nbsp;Celia García-Conejo ,&nbsp;Iván de Amo ,&nbsp;Paloma Marín ,&nbsp;Cristina Flor ,&nbsp;Laura López ,&nbsp;Lucía Ortega ,&nbsp;Isabel Gabaldón-Sánchez ,&nbsp;Rafael de la Espriella ,&nbsp;Juan Sanchis ,&nbsp;Julio Núñez","doi":"10.1016/j.rec.2025.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><div>In asymptomatic individuals, left bundle branch block (LBBB) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, but its impact on maximal functional capacity remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate maximal aerobic capacity (peakVO<sub>2</sub>) in asymptomatic adults with LBBB without structural heart disease and compare it to an age-, physical activity-, and sex-matched control population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective case-control study included asymptomatic adults with isolated LBBB and matched controls. All participants underwent maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing and echocardiography. The primary outcome was to compare peakVO<sub>2</sub> and percent predicted peakVO<sub>2</sub> (pp-peakVO<sub>2</sub>) between LBBB and matched controls. Secondary outcomes included differences in left ventricular indexed end-diastolic volumes (iLVEDV) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Multivariate linear mixed models were used to analyze primary and secondary outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 162 participants (81 with LBBB and 81 controls) were included. The mean age was 65.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->10.2 years, and 106 participants (65.4%) were women. The mean pp-peakVO<sub>2</sub> and peakVO<sub>2</sub> were 93.6<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->16.9% and 19.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->6.4<!--> <!-->mL/kg/min, respectively. There were no significant differences in cardiovascular risk factors, NT-proBNP, or hemoglobin values between groups. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of LBBB was associated with lower peakVO<sub>2</sub> (−3.3<!--> <!-->mL/kg/min, 95%CI,<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->4.6 to<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->2.1; <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.001) and pp-peakVO<sub>2</sub> (−17.2%; 95%CI, −22.1 to −11.9; <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.001). Regarding secondary endpoints, individuals with LBBB showed higher iLVEDV (+4.4<!--> <!-->mL/m<sup>2</sup>, 95%CI, 1.3 to 7.6; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.006) and lower LVEF (−2.8%, 95%CI, −4.3 to −1.2; <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.001) compared with controls.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this study, adults with isolated LBBB showed reduced maximal functional capacity compared with controls.</div><div>Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (<span><span>NCT05643404</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38430,"journal":{"name":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","volume":"78 11","pages":"Pages 957-966"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1885585725000921","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives

In asymptomatic individuals, left bundle branch block (LBBB) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, but its impact on maximal functional capacity remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate maximal aerobic capacity (peakVO2) in asymptomatic adults with LBBB without structural heart disease and compare it to an age-, physical activity-, and sex-matched control population.

Methods

This prospective case-control study included asymptomatic adults with isolated LBBB and matched controls. All participants underwent maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing and echocardiography. The primary outcome was to compare peakVO2 and percent predicted peakVO2 (pp-peakVO2) between LBBB and matched controls. Secondary outcomes included differences in left ventricular indexed end-diastolic volumes (iLVEDV) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Multivariate linear mixed models were used to analyze primary and secondary outcomes.

Results

A total of 162 participants (81 with LBBB and 81 controls) were included. The mean age was 65.7 ± 10.2 years, and 106 participants (65.4%) were women. The mean pp-peakVO2 and peakVO2 were 93.6 ± 16.9% and 19.9 ± 6.4 mL/kg/min, respectively. There were no significant differences in cardiovascular risk factors, NT-proBNP, or hemoglobin values between groups. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of LBBB was associated with lower peakVO2 (−3.3 mL/kg/min, 95%CI,  4.6 to  2.1; P < .001) and pp-peakVO2 (−17.2%; 95%CI, −22.1 to −11.9; P < .001). Regarding secondary endpoints, individuals with LBBB showed higher iLVEDV (+4.4 mL/m2, 95%CI, 1.3 to 7.6; P = .006) and lower LVEF (−2.8%, 95%CI, −4.3 to −1.2; P < .001) compared with controls.

Conclusions

In this study, adults with isolated LBBB showed reduced maximal functional capacity compared with controls.
Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05643404).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无结构性心脏病患者左束支阻滞对最大功能容量的影响。
简介和目的:在无症状个体中,左束分支阻滞(LBBB)与心血管事件风险增加有关,但其对最大功能容量的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估无结构性心脏病的无症状LBBB成人的最大有氧能力(峰值vo2),并将其与年龄、体力活动和性别匹配的对照人群进行比较。方法:这项前瞻性病例对照研究包括无症状的孤立性下脑屏障成人和匹配的对照组。所有参与者都进行了最大心肺运动测试和超声心动图检查。主要结果是比较LBBB和匹配对照之间的峰值vo2和预测峰值vo2百分比(pp-峰值vo2)。次要结局包括左室指数舒张末期容积(iLVEDV)和左室射血分数(LVEF)的差异。多变量线性混合模型用于分析主要和次要结局。结果:共纳入162名参与者(81名LBBB患者和81名对照组)。平均年龄65.7±10.2岁,女性106例(65.4%)。平均pp-peakVO2和peakVO2分别为93.6±16.9%和19.9±6.4 mL/kg/min。两组间心血管危险因素、NT-proBNP或血红蛋白值无显著差异。多因素分析显示,LBBB的存在与较低的峰值vo2相关(-3.3mL/kg/min, 95%CI, -4.6 ~ -2.1;p2 (-17.2%;95%CI, -22.1 ~ -11.9;P 2, 95%CI, 1.3 ~ 7.6;P = .006)和低LVEF(-2.8%, 95%置信区间,-4.3 - -1.2;结论:在这项研究中,与对照组相比,孤立性下脑屏障的成年人表现出最大功能能力的降低。在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT05643404)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
219
期刊最新文献
Revista Española de Cardiología 2025. Predictive model of the cost-effectiveness of left bundle branch area pacing versus right ventricular apical pacing. Single-operator implantation of the new generation VitaFlow Liberty valve for efficient transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the SINGLE-TAVI study. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio association with functional capacity and outcomes in HF with reduced ejection fraction. Transcatheter aortic valve intervention in mixed Sievers type 1 bicuspid aortic valve disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1