Trustworthiness of the electronic health record in Germany: an exploratory, user-centered analysis.

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2025-03-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1473326
Niklas von Kalckreuth, Marvin Kopka, Christine Schmid, Cornelia Kratzer, Anna Reptuschenko, Markus A Feufel
{"title":"Trustworthiness of the electronic health record in Germany: an exploratory, user-centered analysis.","authors":"Niklas von Kalckreuth, Marvin Kopka, Christine Schmid, Cornelia Kratzer, Anna Reptuschenko, Markus A Feufel","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1473326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The integration of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) offers significant potential to improve patient care and reduce costs. In Germany, every patient will be provided with an EHR starting January 2025. However, the success of EHRs depends on patient trust and usage. Understanding the factors that shape perceived trustworthiness is crucial, yet EHR-specific research remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To explore key factors influencing initial trust, 30 German participants interacted with a functionally realistic EHR prototype. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to evaluate its trustworthiness and suggest improvements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thematic analysis identified five key themes: Provider Reputation, User Feedback, User Experience of Contents, User Experience of Functions, and User Data Control.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Fostering trust in the German EHR requires attention to technical features and contextual factors. Beyond provider reputation, three aspects emerged as central: (a) professional visual and user experience design to enhance usability and signal reliability; (b) accurate, clear content to foster transparency; and (c) user empowerment through intuitive data control and accessible support. Transparent communication about GDPR compliance further strengthens trust and supports adoption. In Germany's tightly regulated environment, clearly conveying EHR security standards, providing robust support, and leveraging social proof can significantly enhance trust and drive adoption of digital health solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1473326"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926143/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1473326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The integration of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) offers significant potential to improve patient care and reduce costs. In Germany, every patient will be provided with an EHR starting January 2025. However, the success of EHRs depends on patient trust and usage. Understanding the factors that shape perceived trustworthiness is crucial, yet EHR-specific research remains limited.

Methods: To explore key factors influencing initial trust, 30 German participants interacted with a functionally realistic EHR prototype. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to evaluate its trustworthiness and suggest improvements.

Results: Thematic analysis identified five key themes: Provider Reputation, User Feedback, User Experience of Contents, User Experience of Functions, and User Data Control.

Discussion: Fostering trust in the German EHR requires attention to technical features and contextual factors. Beyond provider reputation, three aspects emerged as central: (a) professional visual and user experience design to enhance usability and signal reliability; (b) accurate, clear content to foster transparency; and (c) user empowerment through intuitive data control and accessible support. Transparent communication about GDPR compliance further strengthens trust and supports adoption. In Germany's tightly regulated environment, clearly conveying EHR security standards, providing robust support, and leveraging social proof can significantly enhance trust and drive adoption of digital health solutions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国电子健康记录的可信度:一项探索性、以用户为中心的分析。
电子健康记录(EHRs)的集成为改善患者护理和降低成本提供了巨大的潜力。在德国,从2025年1月开始,每位患者都将获得电子病历。然而,电子病历的成功取决于患者的信任和使用。了解影响感知可信度的因素至关重要,但针对ehr的研究仍然有限。方法:研究影响初始信任的关键因素,30名德国参与者与一个功能逼真的电子病历原型进行互动。进行半结构化访谈以评估其可信度并提出改进建议。结果:专题分析确定了五个关键主题:提供商声誉、用户反馈、内容用户体验、功能用户体验和用户数据控制。讨论:培养对德国电子病历的信任需要注意技术特点和背景因素。除了提供商声誉之外,三个方面显得尤为重要:(a)专业的视觉和用户体验设计,以增强可用性和信号可靠性;(b)内容准确、清晰,提高透明度;(c)通过直观的数据控制和可访问的支持来授权用户。关于GDPR合规性的透明沟通进一步加强了信任并支持采用。在德国严格监管的环境中,明确传达EHR安全标准,提供强有力的支持,并利用社会证明,可以显著增强信任,推动数字医疗解决方案的采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
An explainable ensemble machine learning model using baseline blood transcriptomics to predict Parkinson's disease motor progression. PICO-based assessment and categorization of evidence for digital health interventions: an inductive framework development. Prescription drug monitoring program perceptions before and after an interprofessional workshop: a theory-informed longitudinal survey study. Tele-rehabilitation in rural Nepal: a systematic review of effectiveness, barriers, and strategic directions for digital health equity. Guideline-based strategies to identify severe cytokine release syndrome in COVID-19 and cancer immunotherapy using large-scale electronic health records.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1