Assessing the Reliability of Pancreatic CT Imaging Biomarkers for Diabetes Prediction: A Dual Center Retrospective Study

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Academic Radiology Pub Date : 2025-03-22 DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2025.02.047
Abhinav Suri MPH , Pritam Mukherjee PhD , Nusrat Rabbee PhD , Perry J. Pickhardt MD , Ronald M. Summers MD, PhD, FSAR, FAIMBE, FSPIE
{"title":"Assessing the Reliability of Pancreatic CT Imaging Biomarkers for Diabetes Prediction: A Dual Center Retrospective Study","authors":"Abhinav Suri MPH ,&nbsp;Pritam Mukherjee PhD ,&nbsp;Nusrat Rabbee PhD ,&nbsp;Perry J. Pickhardt MD ,&nbsp;Ronald M. Summers MD, PhD, FSAR, FAIMBE, FSPIE","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.02.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>Pancreatic imaging biomarkers on CT imaging are known to be associated with diabetes. However, no studies have examined if these imaging biomarkers are resilient to changes in segmentation quality and contrast status. Here, we assess if imaging biomarkers are robust to variations in pancreatic segmentation quality and contrast status, and how these factors affect their ability to predict diabetes.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study selected patients with CT scans and corresponding HbA1c tests from two institutions. Patients were classified into two categories: having diabetes at the time or &lt; 4 years after the scan (diabetic/incident) vs not having diabetes within 4 years after the scan (nondiabetic). Pancreatic imaging biomarkers, including average attenuation, intrapancreatic fat fraction, fractal dimension of the pancreatic boundary and volume, were measured using three pancreatic segmentation algorithms (TotalSegmentator, nnU-Net, and DM-UNet). Pairwise comparisons were made between algorithms when computing pancreatic imaging biomarker values for all patient scans. Predictive ability of imaging biomarkers (derived from each algorithm) was assessed for agreement between algorithms using a generalized additive model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 9772 patients (age, 56.1 years ± 9.1 [SD]; 5407 females) were included in this study. Imaging biomarkers based on attenuation measurements showed high algorithm agreement (ICC ≥0.93), with lower agreement on measures not reliant on attenuation. Models trained on imaging biomarkers derived from these algorithms exhibited good predictive agreement (AUC for diabetes overall, 0.84-0.91; contrast scans, 0.73-0.80; noncontrast scans, 0.62-0.80). Algorithms achieved a positive predictive value of 0.79-0.84, and negative predictive value of 0.89-0.94.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Attenuation-based imaging biomarkers demonstrated robustness to segmentation algorithm quality and consistent predictive ability across different clinical scenarios. These findings suggest that CT-derived biomarkers could be a reliable tool for diabetes screening across multiple institutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"32 7","pages":"Pages 4013-4021"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633225001916","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives

Pancreatic imaging biomarkers on CT imaging are known to be associated with diabetes. However, no studies have examined if these imaging biomarkers are resilient to changes in segmentation quality and contrast status. Here, we assess if imaging biomarkers are robust to variations in pancreatic segmentation quality and contrast status, and how these factors affect their ability to predict diabetes.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study selected patients with CT scans and corresponding HbA1c tests from two institutions. Patients were classified into two categories: having diabetes at the time or < 4 years after the scan (diabetic/incident) vs not having diabetes within 4 years after the scan (nondiabetic). Pancreatic imaging biomarkers, including average attenuation, intrapancreatic fat fraction, fractal dimension of the pancreatic boundary and volume, were measured using three pancreatic segmentation algorithms (TotalSegmentator, nnU-Net, and DM-UNet). Pairwise comparisons were made between algorithms when computing pancreatic imaging biomarker values for all patient scans. Predictive ability of imaging biomarkers (derived from each algorithm) was assessed for agreement between algorithms using a generalized additive model.

Results

A total of 9772 patients (age, 56.1 years ± 9.1 [SD]; 5407 females) were included in this study. Imaging biomarkers based on attenuation measurements showed high algorithm agreement (ICC ≥0.93), with lower agreement on measures not reliant on attenuation. Models trained on imaging biomarkers derived from these algorithms exhibited good predictive agreement (AUC for diabetes overall, 0.84-0.91; contrast scans, 0.73-0.80; noncontrast scans, 0.62-0.80). Algorithms achieved a positive predictive value of 0.79-0.84, and negative predictive value of 0.89-0.94.

Conclusion

Attenuation-based imaging biomarkers demonstrated robustness to segmentation algorithm quality and consistent predictive ability across different clinical scenarios. These findings suggest that CT-derived biomarkers could be a reliable tool for diabetes screening across multiple institutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估胰腺CT成像生物标志物预测糖尿病的可靠性:一项双中心回顾性研究。
理由和目标:众所周知,CT 成像上的胰腺成像生物标志物与糖尿病有关。然而,还没有研究探讨这些成像生物标志物是否能抵御分割质量和对比度状态的变化。在此,我们将评估成像生物标志物是否能抵御胰腺分割质量和对比度状态的变化,以及这些因素如何影响它们预测糖尿病的能力:这项回顾性研究选取了两家机构中接受 CT 扫描和相应 HbA1c 检测的患者。患者被分为两类:扫描时患有糖尿病或扫描后 4 年内未患糖尿病(糖尿病/偶发)与扫描后 4 年内未患糖尿病(非糖尿病)。使用三种胰腺分割算法(TotalSegmentator、nnU-Net 和 DM-UNet)测量了胰腺成像生物标志物,包括平均衰减、胰腺内脂肪分数、胰腺边界分形维度和体积。在计算所有患者扫描的胰腺成像生物标志物值时,对不同算法进行了配对比较。使用广义相加模型评估了不同算法之间成像生物标志物(由每种算法得出)的预测能力是否一致:本研究共纳入 9772 名患者(年龄 56.1 岁 ± 9.1 [SD];5407 名女性)。基于衰减测量的成像生物标记物显示出较高的算法一致性(ICC ≥0.93),而不依赖衰减测量的一致性较低。根据这些算法得出的成像生物标记物训练的模型显示出良好的预测一致性(糖尿病总体的 AUC 为 0.84-0.91;对比扫描为 0.73-0.80;非对比扫描为 0.62-0.80)。算法的阳性预测值为 0.79-0.84,阴性预测值为 0.89-0.94:基于衰减的成像生物标志物表现出对分割算法质量的稳健性,以及在不同临床情况下一致的预测能力。这些研究结果表明,CT 衍生的生物标志物可以成为多个机构进行糖尿病筛查的可靠工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Noninvasive Prediction of Perineural Invasion and Lymphovascular Invasion in Prostate Cancer Using bpMRI Radiomic Signatures. A Novel Combined Independent and ABR/ACGME International Pathway to Address Interventional Radiology Workforce and Educational Challenges: Single-Institution Experience. Diffusion Model-Based Motion Correction in Portable Computed Tomography for Brain: A Human Observer Study. The Anatomical Axis is Preferably Defined Below the Tibial Tuberosity in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Evaluation of Posterior Tibial Slope. Effect of Nitroglycerin-Enhanced Dual-Energy CT on Imaging Periarticular Arteries in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1