Perceptions, approaches, and needs of Czech GPs in the management of patients with persistent somatic symptoms: the results of a nationwide cross-sectional survey.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC primary care Pub Date : 2025-03-22 DOI:10.1186/s12875-025-02768-3
Martin Seifert, Antonin Sebela, Tim Olde Hartman
{"title":"Perceptions, approaches, and needs of Czech GPs in the management of patients with persistent somatic symptoms: the results of a nationwide cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Martin Seifert, Antonin Sebela, Tim Olde Hartman","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02768-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>General practitioners (GPs) perceive patients with persistent somatic symptoms (PSS) as frustrating and difficult to manage. Patients commonly express dissatisfaction with the care they receive and often feel stigmatised and not taken seriously. Some Czech GPs use the option of extra psychosomatic education which focuses on better understanding and management of patients with PSS.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore perceptions of Czech GPs, with and without additional psychosomatic training, regarding the care of patients with PSS, their beliefs, approaches in the management, and their organisational and educational needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide cross-sectional survey study among Czech GPs exploring experiences, perceptions, and needs in managing patients with PSS was conducted. Statistical and qualitative approaches were performed to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 152 GPs (37 with and 115 without additional psychosomatic training) participated in this survey (response rate 20,3%). GPs struggle with negative emotions, communication with patients, diagnostic uncertainty, patients' lack of understanding, the workload these patients generate, lack of specialized care, and other problems of the healthcare system. They call for more psychosomatic education and communication training. This should include theoretical explanatory models, Balint groups, and other kinds of supervision or peer groups. GPs with additional psychosomatic training feel more confident and competent caring for these patients, compared to GPs without such additional training (OR = 4.1; 95% CI = 1.85-9.11); p < 0.005). Furthermore, they view PSS patients as less burdensome (OR = 4.69; 2.11-10.4; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GPs struggle with caring for patients with PSS. GPs with additional psychosomatic education indicate that they have more confidence and competence. Czech GPs call for more time and reimbursement when caring for patients with PSS, more psychosomatic training, better availability of specialized psychosomatic care, and better interdisciplinary cooperation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"79"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929223/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02768-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: General practitioners (GPs) perceive patients with persistent somatic symptoms (PSS) as frustrating and difficult to manage. Patients commonly express dissatisfaction with the care they receive and often feel stigmatised and not taken seriously. Some Czech GPs use the option of extra psychosomatic education which focuses on better understanding and management of patients with PSS.

Objectives: To explore perceptions of Czech GPs, with and without additional psychosomatic training, regarding the care of patients with PSS, their beliefs, approaches in the management, and their organisational and educational needs.

Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional survey study among Czech GPs exploring experiences, perceptions, and needs in managing patients with PSS was conducted. Statistical and qualitative approaches were performed to analyse the data.

Results: A total of 152 GPs (37 with and 115 without additional psychosomatic training) participated in this survey (response rate 20,3%). GPs struggle with negative emotions, communication with patients, diagnostic uncertainty, patients' lack of understanding, the workload these patients generate, lack of specialized care, and other problems of the healthcare system. They call for more psychosomatic education and communication training. This should include theoretical explanatory models, Balint groups, and other kinds of supervision or peer groups. GPs with additional psychosomatic training feel more confident and competent caring for these patients, compared to GPs without such additional training (OR = 4.1; 95% CI = 1.85-9.11); p < 0.005). Furthermore, they view PSS patients as less burdensome (OR = 4.69; 2.11-10.4; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: GPs struggle with caring for patients with PSS. GPs with additional psychosomatic education indicate that they have more confidence and competence. Czech GPs call for more time and reimbursement when caring for patients with PSS, more psychosomatic training, better availability of specialized psychosomatic care, and better interdisciplinary cooperation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Symptoms of anxiety and depression in patients with persistent asthma: a cross-sectional analysis of the INSPIRERS studies.
IF 2.9 3区 医学BMJ OpenPub Date : 2023-05-05 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068725
Mafalda Simões Cunha, Rita Amaral, Ana Margarida Pereira, Rute Almeida, Magna Alves-Correia, Cláudia Chaves Loureiro, Cristina Lopes, Joana Carvalho, Carmelita Ribeiro, Carmen Vidal, Dario Antolín-Amérigo, Diana Pinto, Manuel Ferreira-Magalhães, Maria João Vasconcelos, Carlos Lozoya, Natacha Santos, Francisca Cardia, Luís Taborda-Barata, Rosário Ferreira, Pedro Morais Silva, Tania Monteiro Ferreira, Raquel Câmara, Eurico Silva, Diana Bordalo, Cristina Guimarães, Maria José Calix, Sofia da Silva, Maria Luís Marques, Ana Morete, Carlos Nunes, Cláudia Vieira, Rosália Páscoa, Adelaide Alves, José Varanda Marques, Bruno Reis, Luís Monteiro, Rosário Monteiro, Margarida Cepa, Bruno Valentim, Daniela Sousa Coelho, Sara Fernandes, Patrícia Meireles, Margarida Abreu Aguiar, Ana Rita Mourão, Joao A Fonseca, Cristina Jácome
Perceptions, awareness, and implementation surrounding the assessment of frailty amongst vascular surgeons in Italy: Results from a nationwide cross-sectional survey.
IF 1.1 4区 医学VascularPub Date : 2024-05-26 DOI: 10.1177/17085381241257740
Mario D'Oria, Elena Giacomelli, Aaron T Fargion, Walter Dorigo, Cristiano Calvagna, Marco Campolmi, Raffaele Pulli, Sandro Lepidi
Diagnostic trajectories of patients with rare cancer in the Netherlands: results from a nationwide cross-sectional survey.
IF 2.8 3区 医学Supportive Care in CancerPub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08998-y
Catarina S Padilla, Eline de Heus, Milou J P Reuvers, Marga Schrieks, Vivian Engelen, Dirk Grunhagen, Margot E T Tesselaar, Winette T A van der Graaf, Saskia F A Duijts, Olga Husson
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction: Developing a progress assessment model for age friendly primary health care initiatives. General practitioners' perceptions of interprofessional collaboration in Belgium: a qualitative study. Understanding patients' perceptions of uncomplicated low back pain: a theory-informed qualitative study using the Common-Sense Self-Regulation Model. Perceptions, approaches, and needs of Czech GPs in the management of patients with persistent somatic symptoms: the results of a nationwide cross-sectional survey. A qualitative RE-AIM evaluation of an embedded community paramedicine program in an Ontario Family Health Team.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1