Implementation of a Goals-of-Care Communication Priming Intervention Tailored to Outpatient Stroke Survivors: A Pilot Study.

IF 1.4 The American journal of hospice & palliative care Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-23 DOI:10.1177/10499091251328949
Nauzley C Abedini, Erin K Kross, Ruth A Engelberg, Gigi Garzio, Claire J Creutzfeldt
{"title":"Implementation of a Goals-of-Care Communication Priming Intervention Tailored to Outpatient Stroke Survivors: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Nauzley C Abedini, Erin K Kross, Ruth A Engelberg, Gigi Garzio, Claire J Creutzfeldt","doi":"10.1177/10499091251328949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Serious illness communication priming guides like the Jumpstart Guide can increase goals-of-care conversations (GOCC), but have not been evaluated in the stroke population. <b>Objectives:</b> To conduct a randomized pilot study evaluating feasibility and acceptability of the Jumpstart Guide adapted for outpatient stroke survivors, their surrogates, and clinicians. <b>Methods:</b> We recruited stroke survivors ≥60 years of age (or their surrogates if patients had communication barriers) at a single academically-affiliated stroke clinic. Patients/surrogates were randomized to intervention (patient/surrogate and clinician received pre-visit Jumpstart Guide) or control arms. We assessed feasibility of participant enrollment, survey completion and extraction of GOCC documentation. We assessed acceptability using patient/surrogate and clinician surveys. <b>Results:</b> We enrolled 15/24 (63%) of eligible patients or surrogates, 8 of which were randomized to the intervention vs 7 to the control arm. Six clinicians were enrolled for the 8 intervention encounters. Patient characteristics in both groups were similar with mean age 74.7 years, 10/15 male, 12/15 white, and 10/15 with acute ischemic stroke. Most patients/surrogates (7/8 intervention vs 7/7 control) and all intervention clinicians completed post-visit surveys. Most intervention participants reported successful pre-visit receipt of the Jumpstart Guide (6/7 patient/surrogates; 6/8 clinicians). Of these, all intervention patients/surrogates and 5/6 clinicians stated they would \"definitely\" or \"probably\" recommend it to others. Two intervention vs no control patients had newly documented GOCC post-visit. <b>Conclusions:</b> Implementation of a stroke-specific Jumpstart guide in an outpatient stroke clinic is feasible and acceptable. A large randomized controlled trial is needed to evaluate its efficacy in improving GOCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"332-338"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251328949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Serious illness communication priming guides like the Jumpstart Guide can increase goals-of-care conversations (GOCC), but have not been evaluated in the stroke population. Objectives: To conduct a randomized pilot study evaluating feasibility and acceptability of the Jumpstart Guide adapted for outpatient stroke survivors, their surrogates, and clinicians. Methods: We recruited stroke survivors ≥60 years of age (or their surrogates if patients had communication barriers) at a single academically-affiliated stroke clinic. Patients/surrogates were randomized to intervention (patient/surrogate and clinician received pre-visit Jumpstart Guide) or control arms. We assessed feasibility of participant enrollment, survey completion and extraction of GOCC documentation. We assessed acceptability using patient/surrogate and clinician surveys. Results: We enrolled 15/24 (63%) of eligible patients or surrogates, 8 of which were randomized to the intervention vs 7 to the control arm. Six clinicians were enrolled for the 8 intervention encounters. Patient characteristics in both groups were similar with mean age 74.7 years, 10/15 male, 12/15 white, and 10/15 with acute ischemic stroke. Most patients/surrogates (7/8 intervention vs 7/7 control) and all intervention clinicians completed post-visit surveys. Most intervention participants reported successful pre-visit receipt of the Jumpstart Guide (6/7 patient/surrogates; 6/8 clinicians). Of these, all intervention patients/surrogates and 5/6 clinicians stated they would "definitely" or "probably" recommend it to others. Two intervention vs no control patients had newly documented GOCC post-visit. Conclusions: Implementation of a stroke-specific Jumpstart guide in an outpatient stroke clinic is feasible and acceptable. A large randomized controlled trial is needed to evaluate its efficacy in improving GOCC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对门诊脑卒中幸存者实施护理目标沟通引导干预:试点研究。
背景:像Jumpstart指南这样的严重疾病沟通启动指南可以增加护理目标对话(GOCC),但尚未在卒中人群中进行评估。目的:开展一项随机试点研究,评估Jumpstart指南适用于门诊中风幸存者、其代理人和临床医生的可行性和可接受性。方法:我们在一家学术附属中风诊所招募年龄≥60岁的中风幸存者(如果患者有沟通障碍,则招募其代理人)。患者/代理人被随机分为干预组(患者/代理人和临床医生接受访问前Jumpstart指南)或对照组。我们评估了参与者入组、调查完成情况和GOCC文件提取的可行性。我们通过对患者/代理人和临床医生的调查来评估可接受性。结果:我们纳入了15/24(63%)符合条件的患者或替代患者,其中8人随机分配到干预组,7人随机分配到对照组。6名临床医生参加了8次干预接触。两组患者特征相似,平均年龄74.7岁,男性10/15,白人12/15,急性缺血性脑卒中10/15。大多数患者/代理人(7/8干预对照7/7对照)和所有干预临床医生完成了访后调查。大多数干预参与者报告成功地在访问前收到Jumpstart指南(6/7患者/代理人;6/8的医生)。其中,所有的干预患者/代理人和5/6的临床医生表示他们“肯定”或“可能”推荐给其他人。两组干预患者与未对照组患者在随访后出现新记录的GOCC。结论:在卒中门诊实施卒中特异性Jumpstart指南是可行且可接受的。需要大型随机对照试验来评估其改善GOCC的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Use of a Prayer Tree to Support the Emotional and Spiritual Needs of Visitors to Critical Care Units in the Deep South Region of the United States. Advance Care Planning Completion and Decision-Making Among Older Adults With Cancer and Their Family Caregivers: Findings From a Mixed Methods Study. The Impact of Cognitive Impairment on Advance Care Planning and Healthcare Utilization in People With ALS. Factors Determining Home Death Among Older Adults in Thailand. The Perspectives of Older People With HIV (OPWH) on Advance Care Planning (ACP): A Qualitative Study in Primary Care Clinics in Kuala Lumpur.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1