A Qualitative Exploration of the Experiences of Disclosing Non-Monogamy

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Archives of Sexual Behavior Pub Date : 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1007/s10508-025-03119-0
Joel R. Anderson, Alena Bondarchuk-McLaughlin, Scarlet Rosa, Karen D. Goldschlager, D. X. Hinton Jordan
{"title":"A Qualitative Exploration of the Experiences of Disclosing Non-Monogamy","authors":"Joel R. Anderson,&nbsp;Alena Bondarchuk-McLaughlin,&nbsp;Scarlet Rosa,&nbsp;Karen D. Goldschlager,&nbsp;D. X. Hinton Jordan","doi":"10.1007/s10508-025-03119-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Non-monogamy refers to a set of relationship identities and structures that go against societal norms and expectations of “typical” relationships (i.e., monogamous heteronormative dyadic relationships). As such, non-monogamous individuals often conceal this identity and then need to engage in continuous decision-making processes regarding when and how to disclose, due in part to the structural barriers, stigma, and discrimination faced by this population. This study sought to explore the experiences of the disclosure of consensual (or ethical) non-monogamy and the factors impacting on the decision to disclose across a range of environments. Data on lived experiences were explored by conducting qualitative semi-structured interviews with 32 non-monogamous adults living in Australia. Based on grounded theory, four key themes were identified during the analysis of the data: (1) decisions around how and when to disclosure are complex, (2) responses to disclosure are typically negative, (3) structural barriers typically prevent disclosure, and (4) unless specifically trained, healthcare providers are typically uninformed about non-monogamy. These findings are discussed in relation to providing a base model of disclosure for future research to build upon and to enhance understanding of systemic and healthcare-related issues faced by this population. This research adds to the current understanding of factors impacting disclosure, with possible clinical implications and suggestions for future research discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8327,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","volume":"54 4","pages":"1481 - 1495"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10508-025-03119-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Sexual Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-025-03119-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-monogamy refers to a set of relationship identities and structures that go against societal norms and expectations of “typical” relationships (i.e., monogamous heteronormative dyadic relationships). As such, non-monogamous individuals often conceal this identity and then need to engage in continuous decision-making processes regarding when and how to disclose, due in part to the structural barriers, stigma, and discrimination faced by this population. This study sought to explore the experiences of the disclosure of consensual (or ethical) non-monogamy and the factors impacting on the decision to disclose across a range of environments. Data on lived experiences were explored by conducting qualitative semi-structured interviews with 32 non-monogamous adults living in Australia. Based on grounded theory, four key themes were identified during the analysis of the data: (1) decisions around how and when to disclosure are complex, (2) responses to disclosure are typically negative, (3) structural barriers typically prevent disclosure, and (4) unless specifically trained, healthcare providers are typically uninformed about non-monogamy. These findings are discussed in relation to providing a base model of disclosure for future research to build upon and to enhance understanding of systemic and healthcare-related issues faced by this population. This research adds to the current understanding of factors impacting disclosure, with possible clinical implications and suggestions for future research discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对披露非一夫一妻制经历的定性探索
非一夫一妻制指的是一组违背社会规范和“典型”关系(即一夫一妻制异性恋二元关系)期望的关系身份和结构。因此,非一夫一妻制的个体往往会隐瞒自己的身份,然后需要在何时以及如何披露的问题上不断做出决策,部分原因是这一群体面临的结构性障碍、耻辱和歧视。本研究旨在探索双方同意(或道德)的非一夫一妻制的披露经历,以及在一系列环境中影响披露决定的因素。通过对32名生活在澳大利亚的非一夫一妻制成年人进行定性半结构化访谈,探索了生活经历的数据。根据基础理论,在数据分析期间确定了四个关键主题:(1)关于如何和何时披露的决定很复杂;(2)对披露的反应通常是消极的;(3)结构性障碍通常阻止披露;(4)除非经过专门培训,否则医疗保健提供者通常不了解非一夫一妻制。本文讨论了这些发现,为未来的研究提供了一个基本的披露模型,以加强对这一人群面临的系统性和医疗保健相关问题的理解。本研究增加了目前对影响信息披露因素的理解,并讨论了可能的临床意义和对未来研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: The official publication of the International Academy of Sex Research, the journal is dedicated to the dissemination of information in the field of sexual science, broadly defined. Contributions consist of empirical research (both quantitative and qualitative), theoretical reviews and essays, clinical case reports, letters to the editor, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Balancing Sexual Communal Motivation and Agency in Chinese Romantic Relationships: The Role of Sexual Assertiveness. Sexual Communication: Assessing the Validity of Three Scales that Reflect In-Person, Text-Based, and Voice Chat-Based Frequency of Communication Among U.S. Young Adults. Profiles of Risky Sexual Behaviors and Associated Factors Among Sexually Active Men in Rwanda: A Nationwide Survey. Mutual Sexual Rights in Islamic Jurisprudence: A Critical Analytical Review. The Case for Classifying Authority Transfer Relationships as a Form of BDSM.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1