Factors influencing laser test spot practices among dermatologists: a cross-sectional survey of the association of academic cosmetic dermatology members

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Archives of Dermatological Research Pub Date : 2025-03-26 DOI:10.1007/s00403-025-04159-1
Jennifer Y. Wang, Paras Patel, Margaret Kabakova, Marc Cohen, Jared Jagdeo
{"title":"Factors influencing laser test spot practices among dermatologists: a cross-sectional survey of the association of academic cosmetic dermatology members","authors":"Jennifer Y. Wang,&nbsp;Paras Patel,&nbsp;Margaret Kabakova,&nbsp;Marc Cohen,&nbsp;Jared Jagdeo","doi":"10.1007/s00403-025-04159-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Laser treatments are associated with adverse events such as pain, dyspigmentation, and scarring. Laser test spots may mitigate these risks by assessing patients’ skin reactions before full treatment. We aim to explore the factors influencing dermatologists’ use of test spots. A survey on the factors influencing dermatologists’ use of laser test spots was conducted among Association of Academic Cosmetic Dermatology members. Sixty-six dermatologists took part in this study, resulting in a response rate of 48.2%. Top factors influencing the decision to perform a test spot include “darker skin type” (96.9%) and the “type of laser” (71.9%). A majority of dermatologists believe patients feel more comfortable if a test spot is performed (87.3%). Common reasons dermatologists chose not to perform test spots include “familiarity with the patient's skin type and reaction” (87.9%) and “using a laser type/setting with well-known outcomes based on previous experience” (86.4%). This study provides crucial insights into factors influencing dermatologists' use of laser test spots and underscores the importance of developing standardized protocols. Future research is needed to assess changes in laser test spot practices over time and to develop standardized guidelines to improve treatment safety and efficacy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8203,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Dermatological Research","volume":"317 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Dermatological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-025-04159-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Laser treatments are associated with adverse events such as pain, dyspigmentation, and scarring. Laser test spots may mitigate these risks by assessing patients’ skin reactions before full treatment. We aim to explore the factors influencing dermatologists’ use of test spots. A survey on the factors influencing dermatologists’ use of laser test spots was conducted among Association of Academic Cosmetic Dermatology members. Sixty-six dermatologists took part in this study, resulting in a response rate of 48.2%. Top factors influencing the decision to perform a test spot include “darker skin type” (96.9%) and the “type of laser” (71.9%). A majority of dermatologists believe patients feel more comfortable if a test spot is performed (87.3%). Common reasons dermatologists chose not to perform test spots include “familiarity with the patient's skin type and reaction” (87.9%) and “using a laser type/setting with well-known outcomes based on previous experience” (86.4%). This study provides crucial insights into factors influencing dermatologists' use of laser test spots and underscores the importance of developing standardized protocols. Future research is needed to assess changes in laser test spot practices over time and to develop standardized guidelines to improve treatment safety and efficacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响皮肤科医生激光测试点实践的因素:学术美容皮肤科成员协会的横断面调查
激光治疗与疼痛、色素沉着和疤痕等不良反应有关。激光测试点可以在全面治疗前评估患者的皮肤反应,从而降低这些风险。我们旨在探讨影响皮肤科医生使用测试点的因素。我们在美容皮肤科学术协会会员中开展了一项关于影响皮肤科医生使用激光测试点的因素的调查。66名皮肤科医生参与了这项研究,回复率为48.2%。影响决定是否进行斑点测试的首要因素包括 "深色皮肤类型"(96.9%)和 "激光类型"(71.9%)。大多数皮肤科医生认为,如果进行了斑点测试,患者会感觉更舒适(87.3%)。皮肤科医生选择不做测试点的常见原因包括 "熟悉病人的皮肤类型和反应"(87.9%)和 "根据以往经验使用效果众所周知的激光类型/设置"(86.4%)。这项研究就影响皮肤科医生使用激光测试点的因素提供了重要见解,并强调了制定标准化方案的重要性。未来的研究需要评估激光试色方法随时间推移而发生的变化,并制定标准化指南,以提高治疗的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Dermatological Research is a highly rated international journal that publishes original contributions in the field of experimental dermatology, including papers on biochemistry, morphology and immunology of the skin. The journal is among the few not related to dermatological associations or belonging to respective societies which guarantees complete independence. This English-language journal also offers a platform for review articles in areas of interest for dermatologists and for publication of innovative clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Serum glycoprotein 96, a heat shock protein 90 paralog, as a potential biomarker in psoriasis: a prospective case-control study Targeting IL-17 in fibrosing skin disease: a review of evidence in systemic sclerosis & morphea Tinted but not transparent: a survey of allergen prevalence and marketing claims in U.S. Tinted sunscreens Use of energy-based devices for acne and sequelae in skin of color: a review of efficacy, safety, and practice considerations Exploring patient-initiated communication after nail procedures: a single-center retrospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1