Assessing the impact of different types of masks on COPD patients: a randomised controlled trial.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM ERJ Open Research Pub Date : 2025-03-24 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1183/23120541.00806-2024
Jingchun Fan, Tiantian Feng, Xiaomei Jiang, Caihong Wei, Xuhui Zhang, Caiyun Li, Feiyan Yue, Hong Yang, Shisan Bao, Xuwen Chen
{"title":"Assessing the impact of different types of masks on COPD patients: a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Jingchun Fan, Tiantian Feng, Xiaomei Jiang, Caihong Wei, Xuhui Zhang, Caiyun Li, Feiyan Yue, Hong Yang, Shisan Bao, Xuwen Chen","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00806-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wearing masks imposes an additional respiratory burden on COPD patients. This study aimed to investigate the impact of various mask types on physiological parameters and subjective feelings in COPD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomised, open-label, parallel-controlled trial randomly assigned 129 COPD patients from two Chinese hospitals to the N95 mask group, the surgical mask group and the no mask group, who were required to complete a 6-min rest (6MR) and a 6-min walking test (6MWT) while wearing their designated masks, and were assessed for blood pressure, oxygen saturation, pulse rate, Borg score, rating of perceived exertion (RPE) score, 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and subjective feeling score. Data were analysed using intention-to-treat analysis and per-protocol analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed in blood pressure, oxygen saturation, pulse rate or the 6MWD among the three groups following a 6MR or 6MWT. Wearing N95 masks and surgical masks during the 6MWT significantly elevated perceived dyspnoea (p<0.001) and exertion scores (p<0.001) in COPD patients. The differences in the two scores between the highest and lowest groups were 2 and 4 points, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Wearing surgical masks or N95 masks for 6MR or 6MWT did not adversely affect physiological parameters in COPD patients. However, it significantly increased perceived dyspnoea and exertion.</p>","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00806-2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Wearing masks imposes an additional respiratory burden on COPD patients. This study aimed to investigate the impact of various mask types on physiological parameters and subjective feelings in COPD patients.

Methods: This randomised, open-label, parallel-controlled trial randomly assigned 129 COPD patients from two Chinese hospitals to the N95 mask group, the surgical mask group and the no mask group, who were required to complete a 6-min rest (6MR) and a 6-min walking test (6MWT) while wearing their designated masks, and were assessed for blood pressure, oxygen saturation, pulse rate, Borg score, rating of perceived exertion (RPE) score, 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and subjective feeling score. Data were analysed using intention-to-treat analysis and per-protocol analysis.

Results: No significant differences were observed in blood pressure, oxygen saturation, pulse rate or the 6MWD among the three groups following a 6MR or 6MWT. Wearing N95 masks and surgical masks during the 6MWT significantly elevated perceived dyspnoea (p<0.001) and exertion scores (p<0.001) in COPD patients. The differences in the two scores between the highest and lowest groups were 2 and 4 points, respectively.

Conclusion: Wearing surgical masks or N95 masks for 6MR or 6MWT did not adversely affect physiological parameters in COPD patients. However, it significantly increased perceived dyspnoea and exertion.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估不同类型口罩对COPD患者的影响:一项随机对照试验。
背景:戴口罩会给COPD患者带来额外的呼吸负担。本研究旨在探讨不同口罩类型对COPD患者生理参数及主观感受的影响。方法:本随机、开放标签、平行对照试验将129名中国两家医院的COPD患者随机分为N95口罩组、外科口罩组和无口罩组,要求患者在佩戴指定口罩的情况下完成6分钟休息(6MR)和6分钟步行测试(6MWT),并评估血压、血氧饱和度、脉搏率、Borg评分、感知运动评分(RPE)评分、6分钟步行距离(6MWD)和主观感觉评分。数据分析采用意向治疗分析和协议分析。结果:6MR或6MWT后三组患者血压、血氧饱和度、脉搏率及6MWD均无显著差异。在6MWT期间佩戴N95口罩和外科口罩可显著提高感知到的呼吸困难(结论:6MR或6MWT期间佩戴外科口罩或N95口罩对COPD患者的生理参数没有不利影响。然而,它明显增加了呼吸困难和用力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ERJ Open Research
ERJ Open Research Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.
期刊最新文献
Clinical relevance of CompEx Asthma and impact on disease trajectory: benralizumab effect. ERS Congress 2025: highlights from the Sleep Disordered Breathing Assembly. Echoes of smoke: unwinding multigenerational asthma risk through longitudinal cohorts. High 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in positron emission tomography-computed tomography is associated with emphysema progression. Dendritic cells in the lung cavities of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis patients exhibit altered frequency and phenotype.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1