Outcomes and anticoagulant management for new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction following primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Findings from a national multicenter registry and meta-analysis
Can Zhou MD , Minghui Zhang MD , Zixu Zhao MD , Enze Li MD , Yichen Zhao MD , Hong Wang MD , Wei Luo MD , Keyang Zheng MD , Yu Liu MD , Chengqian Yin MD , Xinyong Zhang MD , Hai Gao MD , Xiaotong Hou MD , Dong Zhao MD , Changsheng Ma MD
{"title":"Outcomes and anticoagulant management for new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction following primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Findings from a national multicenter registry and meta-analysis","authors":"Can Zhou MD , Minghui Zhang MD , Zixu Zhao MD , Enze Li MD , Yichen Zhao MD , Hong Wang MD , Wei Luo MD , Keyang Zheng MD , Yu Liu MD , Chengqian Yin MD , Xinyong Zhang MD , Hai Gao MD , Xiaotong Hou MD , Dong Zhao MD , Changsheng Ma MD","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.02.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><span>Little is known about the risk factors and prognosis of new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) in patients with </span>primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and prognosis of NOAF after PCI and the effects of anticoagulation on clinical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Using data from the CCC-ACS (Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China–Acute Coronary Syndrome) project, ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing PCI were stratified into 2 groups: with NOAF or without any atrial fibrillation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify NOAF predictors, and propensity-score matching estimated associations between NOAF and in-hospital outcomes. A meta-analysis was also performed by pooling our results with literature data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>Of 19,288 STEMI patients undergoing PCI, 1.3% (n = 253) experienced NOAF. Independent risk factors were age ≥65 years, history of hypertension, stroke, heart failure, Killip class<span> IV, and right coronary artery as the culprit artery. NOAF was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 2.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08–4.71), heart failure (HR 4.29, 95% CI 2.81–6.55), </span></span>cardiogenic shock<span> (HR 4.30, 95% CI 2.28–8.13), in-stent thrombosis (HR 6.04, 95% CI 1.71–21.45), and major bleeding<span> (HR 2.86, 95% CI 1.44–5.66) during hospitalization. Meta-analysis found that NOAF had a higher risk of in-hospital stroke (odds ratio 3.33, 95% CI 1.73–6.43). In-hospital use of anticoagulants was associated with lower rates of all-cause mortality but similar rates of major bleeding in NOAF patients.</span></span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study suggests NOAF following PCI is uncommon but associated with poor in-hospital prognosis. Findings support the use of anticoagulants in these patients during hospitalization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":"22 12","pages":"Pages 3073-3081"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1547527125002061","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Little is known about the risk factors and prognosis of new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) in patients with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Objective
The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and prognosis of NOAF after PCI and the effects of anticoagulation on clinical outcomes.
Method
Using data from the CCC-ACS (Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China–Acute Coronary Syndrome) project, ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing PCI were stratified into 2 groups: with NOAF or without any atrial fibrillation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify NOAF predictors, and propensity-score matching estimated associations between NOAF and in-hospital outcomes. A meta-analysis was also performed by pooling our results with literature data.
Results
Of 19,288 STEMI patients undergoing PCI, 1.3% (n = 253) experienced NOAF. Independent risk factors were age ≥65 years, history of hypertension, stroke, heart failure, Killip class IV, and right coronary artery as the culprit artery. NOAF was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 2.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08–4.71), heart failure (HR 4.29, 95% CI 2.81–6.55), cardiogenic shock (HR 4.30, 95% CI 2.28–8.13), in-stent thrombosis (HR 6.04, 95% CI 1.71–21.45), and major bleeding (HR 2.86, 95% CI 1.44–5.66) during hospitalization. Meta-analysis found that NOAF had a higher risk of in-hospital stroke (odds ratio 3.33, 95% CI 1.73–6.43). In-hospital use of anticoagulants was associated with lower rates of all-cause mortality but similar rates of major bleeding in NOAF patients.
Conclusion
Our study suggests NOAF following PCI is uncommon but associated with poor in-hospital prognosis. Findings support the use of anticoagulants in these patients during hospitalization.
背景:对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者新发房颤(NOAF)的危险因素和预后知之甚少。目的:探讨PCI术后NOAF的发生率、预后及抗凝治疗对临床预后的影响。方法:利用CCC-ACS(改善心血管疾病在中国急性冠脉综合征中的护理)项目的数据,将行PCI术的st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者分为伴有NOAF和无房颤两组。采用多变量逻辑回归确定NOAF预测因子,并使用倾向评分匹配估计NOAF与院内结局之间的关联。通过将我们的结果与文献数据汇总,还进行了荟萃分析。结果:在19288例接受PCI的STEMI患者中,1.3% (n = 253)发生了NOAF。独立危险因素为年龄≥65岁、高血压病史、脑卒中、心力衰竭、Killip IV级、右冠状动脉为罪魁祸首动脉。NOAF与住院期间全因死亡率(风险比[HR] 2.26, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.08-4.71)、心力衰竭(风险比4.29,95% CI 2.81-6.55)、心源性休克(风险比4.30,95% CI 2.28-8.13)、支架内血栓形成(风险比6.04,95% CI 1.71-21.45)和大出血(风险比2.86,95% CI 1.44-5.66)的高风险相关。荟萃分析发现,NOAF有更高的院内卒中风险(优势比3.33,95% CI 1.73-6.43)。院内抗凝剂的使用与NOAF患者的全因死亡率较低相关,但与大出血率相似。结论:本研究提示PCI术后NOAF少见,但与院内预后不良相关。研究结果支持这些患者在住院期间使用抗凝剂。
期刊介绍:
HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability.
HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community.
The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.