Outcomes and anticoagulant management for new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction following primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Findings from a national multicenter registry and meta-analysis

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart rhythm Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.02.036
Can Zhou MD , Minghui Zhang MD , Zixu Zhao MD , Enze Li MD , Yichen Zhao MD , Hong Wang MD , Wei Luo MD , Keyang Zheng MD , Yu Liu MD , Chengqian Yin MD , Xinyong Zhang MD , Hai Gao MD , Xiaotong Hou MD , Dong Zhao MD , Changsheng Ma MD
{"title":"Outcomes and anticoagulant management for new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction following primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Findings from a national multicenter registry and meta-analysis","authors":"Can Zhou MD ,&nbsp;Minghui Zhang MD ,&nbsp;Zixu Zhao MD ,&nbsp;Enze Li MD ,&nbsp;Yichen Zhao MD ,&nbsp;Hong Wang MD ,&nbsp;Wei Luo MD ,&nbsp;Keyang Zheng MD ,&nbsp;Yu Liu MD ,&nbsp;Chengqian Yin MD ,&nbsp;Xinyong Zhang MD ,&nbsp;Hai Gao MD ,&nbsp;Xiaotong Hou MD ,&nbsp;Dong Zhao MD ,&nbsp;Changsheng Ma MD","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.02.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><span>Little is known about the risk factors and prognosis of new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) in patients with </span>primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and prognosis of NOAF after PCI and the effects of anticoagulation on clinical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Using data from the CCC-ACS (Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China–Acute Coronary Syndrome) project, ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing PCI were stratified into 2 groups: with NOAF or without any atrial fibrillation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify NOAF predictors, and propensity-score matching estimated associations between NOAF and in-hospital outcomes. A meta-analysis was also performed by pooling our results with literature data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>Of 19,288 STEMI patients undergoing PCI, 1.3% (n = 253) experienced NOAF. Independent risk factors were age ≥65 years, history of hypertension, stroke, heart failure, Killip class<span> IV, and right coronary artery as the culprit artery. NOAF was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 2.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08–4.71), heart failure (HR 4.29, 95% CI 2.81–6.55), </span></span>cardiogenic shock<span> (HR 4.30, 95% CI 2.28–8.13), in-stent thrombosis (HR 6.04, 95% CI 1.71–21.45), and major bleeding<span> (HR 2.86, 95% CI 1.44–5.66) during hospitalization. Meta-analysis found that NOAF had a higher risk of in-hospital stroke (odds ratio 3.33, 95% CI 1.73–6.43). In-hospital use of anticoagulants was associated with lower rates of all-cause mortality but similar rates of major bleeding in NOAF patients.</span></span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study suggests NOAF following PCI is uncommon but associated with poor in-hospital prognosis. Findings support the use of anticoagulants in these patients during hospitalization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":"22 12","pages":"Pages 3073-3081"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1547527125002061","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Little is known about the risk factors and prognosis of new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) in patients with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and prognosis of NOAF after PCI and the effects of anticoagulation on clinical outcomes.

Method

Using data from the CCC-ACS (Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China–Acute Coronary Syndrome) project, ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing PCI were stratified into 2 groups: with NOAF or without any atrial fibrillation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify NOAF predictors, and propensity-score matching estimated associations between NOAF and in-hospital outcomes. A meta-analysis was also performed by pooling our results with literature data.

Results

Of 19,288 STEMI patients undergoing PCI, 1.3% (n = 253) experienced NOAF. Independent risk factors were age ≥65 years, history of hypertension, stroke, heart failure, Killip class IV, and right coronary artery as the culprit artery. NOAF was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 2.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08–4.71), heart failure (HR 4.29, 95% CI 2.81–6.55), cardiogenic shock (HR 4.30, 95% CI 2.28–8.13), in-stent thrombosis (HR 6.04, 95% CI 1.71–21.45), and major bleeding (HR 2.86, 95% CI 1.44–5.66) during hospitalization. Meta-analysis found that NOAF had a higher risk of in-hospital stroke (odds ratio 3.33, 95% CI 1.73–6.43). In-hospital use of anticoagulants was associated with lower rates of all-cause mortality but similar rates of major bleeding in NOAF patients.

Conclusion

Our study suggests NOAF following PCI is uncommon but associated with poor in-hospital prognosis. Findings support the use of anticoagulants in these patients during hospitalization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后st段抬高型心肌梗死患者新发房颤的结局和抗凝治疗:来自国家多中心登记和荟萃分析的结果。
背景:对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者新发房颤(NOAF)的危险因素和预后知之甚少。目的:探讨PCI术后NOAF的发生率、预后及抗凝治疗对临床预后的影响。方法:利用CCC-ACS(改善心血管疾病在中国急性冠脉综合征中的护理)项目的数据,将行PCI术的st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者分为伴有NOAF和无房颤两组。采用多变量逻辑回归确定NOAF预测因子,并使用倾向评分匹配估计NOAF与院内结局之间的关联。通过将我们的结果与文献数据汇总,还进行了荟萃分析。结果:在19288例接受PCI的STEMI患者中,1.3% (n = 253)发生了NOAF。独立危险因素为年龄≥65岁、高血压病史、脑卒中、心力衰竭、Killip IV级、右冠状动脉为罪魁祸首动脉。NOAF与住院期间全因死亡率(风险比[HR] 2.26, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.08-4.71)、心力衰竭(风险比4.29,95% CI 2.81-6.55)、心源性休克(风险比4.30,95% CI 2.28-8.13)、支架内血栓形成(风险比6.04,95% CI 1.71-21.45)和大出血(风险比2.86,95% CI 1.44-5.66)的高风险相关。荟萃分析发现,NOAF有更高的院内卒中风险(优势比3.33,95% CI 1.73-6.43)。院内抗凝剂的使用与NOAF患者的全因死亡率较低相关,但与大出血率相似。结论:本研究提示PCI术后NOAF少见,但与院内预后不良相关。研究结果支持这些患者在住院期间使用抗凝剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart rhythm
Heart rhythm 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.50%
发文量
1465
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability. HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community. The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.
期刊最新文献
Lead failure and venous occlusion as potential drivers of extraction difficulty. Corrigendum to "Development and validation of a new disease-specific quality-of-life measure for atrial fibrillation derived from patient perspectives: The Atrial Fibrillation Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (AF-PROMs) Questionnaire," Heart Rhythm, Volume 22, Issue 8, P1922-1934, August 2025. Activation signature valleys are predictive of macroreentrant atrial tachycardia bottlenecks where uniform low voltage and uniform slow conduction reside. Antiarrhythmic Drugs Versus Catheter Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in An Elderly Population: A Retrospective Analysis of Medicare Advantage Enrollees in the United States. Class Ic antiarrhythmic drugs and structural heart disease - time for a randomized controlled study?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1