Comparisons of test-retest reliability of infraspinatus strength during wiper exercise with and without external fixation in individuals of scapular dyskinesis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1177/10538127251318942
Eun-Chong Kim, Min-Young Hwang, Hyun-Min Shin, Su-Yeon Bae, Su-Yeon Cho, In-Cheol Jeon
{"title":"Comparisons of test-retest reliability of infraspinatus strength during wiper exercise with and without external fixation in individuals of scapular dyskinesis.","authors":"Eun-Chong Kim, Min-Young Hwang, Hyun-Min Shin, Su-Yeon Bae, Su-Yeon Cho, In-Cheol Jeon","doi":"10.1177/10538127251318942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe wiper exercise in a side-lying position is commonly used in clinical settings to assess the strength of the infraspinatus muscle. In addition, a reliable test of infraspinatus strength is important for individuals with scapular dyskinesis.ObjectiveThe purpose is to compare the test-retest reliability of infraspinatus strength during the wiper exercise with and without external fixations in individuals with scapular dyskinesis.MethodsThirty individuals with scapular dyskinesis participated. A dynamometer was utilized to measure the strength of the infraspinatus during the wiper exercise with and without external fixation applied to the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) and spinous process of a fourth thoracic vertebra (T4). The intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC 3,1) were used to compare the reliability of infraspinatus strength measurement.ResultsThe reliability for infraspinatus strength measurement was higher with external fixation than without external fixation. The ICC value during wiper exercise with external fixation was 0.99 (95% confidence interval: 0.96-0.99; P < 0.01), and the average strength was 7.35 ± 2.2 kg. In contrast, the ICC value during wiper exercise without external fixation was 0.79 (95% confidence interval: 0.49-0.93; P < 0.01), and the average strength was 5.86 ± 1.45 kg.ConclusionIn individuals with scapular dyskinesis, the infraspinatus strength measurement during the wiper exercise with external fixation is recommended to improve the test-retest reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"886-891"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251318942","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe wiper exercise in a side-lying position is commonly used in clinical settings to assess the strength of the infraspinatus muscle. In addition, a reliable test of infraspinatus strength is important for individuals with scapular dyskinesis.ObjectiveThe purpose is to compare the test-retest reliability of infraspinatus strength during the wiper exercise with and without external fixations in individuals with scapular dyskinesis.MethodsThirty individuals with scapular dyskinesis participated. A dynamometer was utilized to measure the strength of the infraspinatus during the wiper exercise with and without external fixation applied to the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) and spinous process of a fourth thoracic vertebra (T4). The intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC 3,1) were used to compare the reliability of infraspinatus strength measurement.ResultsThe reliability for infraspinatus strength measurement was higher with external fixation than without external fixation. The ICC value during wiper exercise with external fixation was 0.99 (95% confidence interval: 0.96-0.99; P < 0.01), and the average strength was 7.35 ± 2.2 kg. In contrast, the ICC value during wiper exercise without external fixation was 0.79 (95% confidence interval: 0.49-0.93; P < 0.01), and the average strength was 5.86 ± 1.45 kg.ConclusionIn individuals with scapular dyskinesis, the infraspinatus strength measurement during the wiper exercise with external fixation is recommended to improve the test-retest reliability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肩胛骨运动障碍患者在有和没有外固定物的雨刷运动中棘下肌力量的重测可靠性比较。
背景侧躺姿势的雨刷练习通常用于临床评估冈下肌的力量。此外,可靠的冈下肌强度测试对肩胛骨运动障碍患者很重要。目的比较肩胛骨运动障碍患者在有外固定器和无外固定器的情况下进行雨刷运动时的棘下肌力量的重测信度。方法对30例肩胛骨运动障碍患者进行研究。在髂后上棘(PSIS)和第四胸椎棘突(T4)进行有或无外固定物的雨刷运动时,使用测力仪测量棘下肌的强度。使用类内相关系数(ICC 3,1)来比较冈下肌强度测量的可靠性。结果外固定支架组冈下肌强度测量的可靠性高于未外固定支架组。外固定雨刷运动时ICC值为0.99(95%可信区间:0.96-0.99;P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
期刊最新文献
Is force control altered in patients with chronic low back pain? A systematic review. Investigation of kinesiophobia, physical activity, quality of life, depression and anxiety level in adult people with hemophilia: A frequency-matched case-control study. Examination of anterior cruciate ligament injuries and genetic relationship: A systematic study. Can AI chatbots guide patients and physicians about neck pain? A reliability and readability comparison of ChatGPT-4 and Gemini. Critical comments on ultrasound-guided paravertebral oxygen-ozone injections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1