Enhancing patient engagement and understanding: is providing direct access to laboratory results through patient portals adequate?

IF 3.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JAMIA Open Pub Date : 2025-03-24 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf009
Mia Liza A Lustria, Obianuju Aliche, Michael O Killian, Zhe He
{"title":"Enhancing patient engagement and understanding: is providing direct access to laboratory results through patient portals adequate?","authors":"Mia Liza A Lustria, Obianuju Aliche, Michael O Killian, Zhe He","doi":"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore patients' use of patient portals to access lab test results, their comprehension of lab test data, and factors associated with these.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An online survey was administered to 276 adults 18+ years. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with patient portal use to view lab test results and lab test comprehension.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample was predominantly White (72.5%), female (55.4%), with mean age 50.7 ± 15.5 years. Overall, participants had low numeracy (10.79 ± 2.71) and eHealth literacy skills (23.91 ± 5.29), and moderate lab test comprehension scores (18 ± 2.3). White participants with greater eHealth literacy were more likely to access lab test results via patient portals, whereas those with a college education were less likely to do so (χ<sup>2</sup> [3]=31.23, <i>P</i> < .001). The regression showed that older age, fewer chronic conditions, and use of patient portals were significantly related to higher lab test comprehension scores (<i>F</i> [22, 250]=8.73, <i>P</i> <.001). Older adults performed better on comprehension tests but reported having difficulty understanding lab tests, expressing a preference for their doctors to explain them.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings shed light on the experiences and needs of different user groups that must be addressed to enhance their ability to effectively use patient portals for obtaining lab test results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More research is needed to determine patient barriers to comprehending lab test results online and to develop tailored strategies to improve patients' self-efficacy to meaningfully use medical information in patient portals.</p>","PeriodicalId":36278,"journal":{"name":"JAMIA Open","volume":"8 2","pages":"ooaf009"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMIA Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To explore patients' use of patient portals to access lab test results, their comprehension of lab test data, and factors associated with these.

Materials and methods: An online survey was administered to 276 adults 18+ years. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with patient portal use to view lab test results and lab test comprehension.

Results: The sample was predominantly White (72.5%), female (55.4%), with mean age 50.7 ± 15.5 years. Overall, participants had low numeracy (10.79 ± 2.71) and eHealth literacy skills (23.91 ± 5.29), and moderate lab test comprehension scores (18 ± 2.3). White participants with greater eHealth literacy were more likely to access lab test results via patient portals, whereas those with a college education were less likely to do so (χ2 [3]=31.23, P < .001). The regression showed that older age, fewer chronic conditions, and use of patient portals were significantly related to higher lab test comprehension scores (F [22, 250]=8.73, P <.001). Older adults performed better on comprehension tests but reported having difficulty understanding lab tests, expressing a preference for their doctors to explain them.

Discussion: The findings shed light on the experiences and needs of different user groups that must be addressed to enhance their ability to effectively use patient portals for obtaining lab test results.

Conclusion: More research is needed to determine patient barriers to comprehending lab test results online and to develop tailored strategies to improve patients' self-efficacy to meaningfully use medical information in patient portals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强患者参与和理解:通过患者门户网站直接获取实验室结果是否足够?
目的:探讨患者使用患者门户网站获取实验室检测结果,他们对实验室检测数据的理解,以及与这些相关的因素。资料与方法:对276名18岁以上成人进行在线调查。使用多变量逻辑回归来确定与患者使用门户网站查看实验室检查结果和实验室检查理解相关的因素。结果:患者以白人(72.5%)为主,女性(55.4%),平均年龄50.7±15.5岁。总体而言,参与者的计算能力(10.79±2.71)和电子健康素养技能(23.91±5.29)较低,实验室测试理解得分(18±2.3)中等。具有较高电子健康素养的白人参与者更有可能通过患者门户获取实验室检测结果,而受过大学教育的人则不太可能这样做(χ2 [3]=31.23, P F [22,250]=8.73, P讨论:研究结果揭示了不同用户群体的经验和需求,必须解决这些问题,以提高他们有效使用患者门户获取实验室检测结果的能力。结论:需要更多的研究来确定患者在线理解实验室检测结果的障碍,并制定量身定制的策略来提高患者的自我效能感,以便在患者门户网站上有意义地使用医疗信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMIA Open
JAMIA Open Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
102
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessing data quality of rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis patients in the All of Us Research Program. Identifying strategies to leverage electronic health records and health information technology in colorectal cancer screening in primary care clinics. Establishing the Digital Health Equity & Literacy Program (D-HELP): a student-led initiative to address digital health literacy gaps among emergency department patients at rush. Assessment of the adequacy of the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) Genomics standard for the representation of somatic testing reports. Interpretability of an FDA-authorized AI/ML sepsis diagnostic tool improved by SHAP values.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1