Unilateral Vertebroplasty in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: Effects of Cement Amount on Pain, Coronal Balance, and New Compression Fracture Formation.

Mehmet Meral, Merdan Orunoglu
{"title":"Unilateral Vertebroplasty in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: Effects of Cement Amount on Pain, Coronal Balance, and New Compression Fracture Formation.","authors":"Mehmet Meral, Merdan Orunoglu","doi":"10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.48236-24.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the impact of the volume of cement injected during unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) on the occurrence of new fractures, as well as its effect on coronal balance and pain management in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 64 OVCF patients who underwent unilateral PVP were included in this study, and categorized into two groups based on the amount of cement injected during the procedure. The first group comprised 34 patients with an injected cement volume of ?3 ml (37 levels), while the second group comprised the rest with an injected cement volume of > 3 ml (39 levels). Coronal balance changes were evaluated immediately after the procedure and at 6 months post-operatively. The incidence and timing of new fractures following the initial vertebroplasty were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups regarding improvement in pre- and postoperative Visual Analog Scale scores. Similarly, no significant difference was observed in the Cobb angle measurements between the groups. New fractures developed in 1 patient from the small amount cement augmented group, and in 7 patients from the large amount cement augmented group, revealing a statistically significant difference in the incidence of new fracture formation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A higher volume of cement injection during PVP appears to be a risk factor for the increased incidence of new fractures at other vertebral levels in patients with OVCF and these fractures typically occur within six months following the initial procedure. However, the volume of cement did not significantly affect clinical outcomes such as pain relief, mobility, or the restoration of coronal alignment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94381,"journal":{"name":"Turkish neurosurgery","volume":"35 2","pages":"214-221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.48236-24.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the impact of the volume of cement injected during unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) on the occurrence of new fractures, as well as its effect on coronal balance and pain management in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).

Material and methods: A total of 64 OVCF patients who underwent unilateral PVP were included in this study, and categorized into two groups based on the amount of cement injected during the procedure. The first group comprised 34 patients with an injected cement volume of ?3 ml (37 levels), while the second group comprised the rest with an injected cement volume of > 3 ml (39 levels). Coronal balance changes were evaluated immediately after the procedure and at 6 months post-operatively. The incidence and timing of new fractures following the initial vertebroplasty were also analyzed.

Results: No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups regarding improvement in pre- and postoperative Visual Analog Scale scores. Similarly, no significant difference was observed in the Cobb angle measurements between the groups. New fractures developed in 1 patient from the small amount cement augmented group, and in 7 patients from the large amount cement augmented group, revealing a statistically significant difference in the incidence of new fracture formation.

Conclusion: A higher volume of cement injection during PVP appears to be a risk factor for the increased incidence of new fractures at other vertebral levels in patients with OVCF and these fractures typically occur within six months following the initial procedure. However, the volume of cement did not significantly affect clinical outcomes such as pain relief, mobility, or the restoration of coronal alignment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单侧椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折:骨水泥量对疼痛、冠状平衡和新压缩性骨折形成的影响。
目的:探讨骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCFs)患者单侧经皮椎体成形术(PVP)中骨水泥注入量对新骨折发生的影响,以及对冠状平衡和疼痛管理的影响。材料和方法:本研究共纳入64例接受单侧PVP治疗的OVCF患者,根据手术过程中注射水泥的数量分为两组。第一组34例,骨水泥注射量3ml(37个水平),第二组34例,骨水泥注射量3ml(39个水平)。在手术后立即和术后6个月评估冠状平衡变化。我们还分析了初次椎体成形术后新骨折的发生率和时间。结果:两组在术前和术后视觉模拟量表评分的改善方面无统计学差异。同样,两组之间的Cobb角测量值也没有显著差异。少量骨水泥增强组新增骨折1例,大量骨水泥增强组新增骨折7例,新增骨折发生率差异有统计学意义。结论:PVP过程中较高的水泥注射量似乎是OVCF患者其他椎体新骨折发生率增加的危险因素,这些骨折通常发生在初始手术后6个月内。然而,骨水泥的体积并没有显著影响临床结果,如疼痛缓解、活动或冠状排列的恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comparative study of large language models in Turkish neurosurgery education using a mock neurosurgery board examination. Shape Analysis of the Corpus Callosum in Pediatric Hydrocephalus: A Comparison Between Cases With and Without Shunt Revision Surgery. Complications of Biportal Endoscopic Surgery for Lumbar Pathologies: A Retrospective Analysis of 374 Cases. Corrigendum to: Anti-Inflammatory, Antioxidant and Neuroprotective Effects of Niacin on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats. Distal Junctional Failure in Posterior Thoracolumbar Surgery: An Analysis of Spinopelvic Alignment and Surgical Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1