Diagnostic performance of NIRADS on F-18 FDG PET/CT in the post-treatment assessment of head and neck malignancies - a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Pub Date : 2025-03-26 DOI:10.1007/s00259-025-07230-1
Deepanksha Datta, B. Selvakumar, Akhil Dhanesh Goel, Sanskriti Chhibber, Tejpal Gupta
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of NIRADS on F-18 FDG PET/CT in the post-treatment assessment of head and neck malignancies - a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Deepanksha Datta, B. Selvakumar, Akhil Dhanesh Goel, Sanskriti Chhibber, Tejpal Gupta","doi":"10.1007/s00259-025-07230-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>This review aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NIRADS) categories using 2-deoxy 2-(Fluorine-18) fluoro D-glucose positron emission tomography integrated with computed tomography (F-18 FDG PET/CT) to diagnose recurrence or treatment failure in the post-treatment assessment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A systematic search of the indexed medical literature was conducted till 7 November 2024 using PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar to include studies reporting post-treatment recurrence rates on F-18-FDG PET/CT as per the NIRADS criteria. Studies were qualitatively assessed for risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. We categorized patients with ‘NI-RADS≤2’ as low risk of recurrence and ’NI-RADS ≥3’ as high risk of recurrence. Diagnostic performance of NI-RADS was evaluated through weighted-pooling of standard metrics of diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic Odd’s ratio (DOR) and summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve analysis.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Out of 1632 records identified, 8 studies with 7 datasets were included, with over 1200 patients and over 1300 F-18 FDG PET/CT scans. All studies were retrospective, with presence of a risk for bias, publication bias and data heterogeneity. The time between treatment and F-18 FDG PET/CT assessment was 8–17 weeks. For combined sites (primary, nodal or distant sites), the ability of ’NIRADS ≥3’ over ‘NIRADS ≤2’ to detect a recurrence was acceptable with a pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios of 0.68 (95% Confidence Interval, CI 0.63–0.73), 0.90 (95% CI, 0.88–0.92), 6.01 (95% CI, 2.9– 12.6) and 0.47 (95% CI, 0.31– 0.71) respectively, with a DOR of 14.13 (95% CI, 9.78–20.42) and an area under the curve, AUC of 0.859 (Standard Error, SE -0.018) on SROC analysis</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>In F-18 FDG PET/CT done on post-treatment HNSCC patients, the diagnostic performance of NIRADS ≥3 categories over NIRADS ≤ 2 categories in detecting treatment failure or recurrence at combined primary, nodal or distant sites was acceptable, with a low certainty of evidence. The NIRADS categories, especially NIRADS ≥3 and NIRADS ≤2 categories should be routinely reported in post-treatment F-18 FDG PET/CT scans in HNSCC patients. (No funding received; PROSPERO No. CRD42022376017)</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07230-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This review aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NIRADS) categories using 2-deoxy 2-(Fluorine-18) fluoro D-glucose positron emission tomography integrated with computed tomography (F-18 FDG PET/CT) to diagnose recurrence or treatment failure in the post-treatment assessment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

Methods

A systematic search of the indexed medical literature was conducted till 7 November 2024 using PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar to include studies reporting post-treatment recurrence rates on F-18-FDG PET/CT as per the NIRADS criteria. Studies were qualitatively assessed for risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. We categorized patients with ‘NI-RADS≤2’ as low risk of recurrence and ’NI-RADS ≥3’ as high risk of recurrence. Diagnostic performance of NI-RADS was evaluated through weighted-pooling of standard metrics of diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic Odd’s ratio (DOR) and summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve analysis.

Results

Out of 1632 records identified, 8 studies with 7 datasets were included, with over 1200 patients and over 1300 F-18 FDG PET/CT scans. All studies were retrospective, with presence of a risk for bias, publication bias and data heterogeneity. The time between treatment and F-18 FDG PET/CT assessment was 8–17 weeks. For combined sites (primary, nodal or distant sites), the ability of ’NIRADS ≥3’ over ‘NIRADS ≤2’ to detect a recurrence was acceptable with a pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios of 0.68 (95% Confidence Interval, CI 0.63–0.73), 0.90 (95% CI, 0.88–0.92), 6.01 (95% CI, 2.9– 12.6) and 0.47 (95% CI, 0.31– 0.71) respectively, with a DOR of 14.13 (95% CI, 9.78–20.42) and an area under the curve, AUC of 0.859 (Standard Error, SE -0.018) on SROC analysis

Conclusion

In F-18 FDG PET/CT done on post-treatment HNSCC patients, the diagnostic performance of NIRADS ≥3 categories over NIRADS ≤ 2 categories in detecting treatment failure or recurrence at combined primary, nodal or distant sites was acceptable, with a low certainty of evidence. The NIRADS categories, especially NIRADS ≥3 and NIRADS ≤2 categories should be routinely reported in post-treatment F-18 FDG PET/CT scans in HNSCC patients. (No funding received; PROSPERO No. CRD42022376017)

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NIRADS对F-18 FDG PET/CT在头颈部恶性肿瘤治疗后评估中的诊断性能——一项系统回顾和meta分析
目的本综述旨在评价颈部影像报告和数据系统(NIRADS)分类使用2-脱氧2-(氟-18)氟d -葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描结合计算机断层扫描(F-18 FDG PET/CT)诊断头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)治疗后评估中复发或治疗失败的诊断性能。方法系统检索PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane Library和b谷歌Scholar检索到2024年11月7日的已编入索引的医学文献,纳入按照NIRADS标准报告F-18-FDG PET/CT治疗后复发率的研究。使用QUADAS-2工具对研究的偏倚风险进行定性评估。我们将“NI-RADS≤2”的患者归为低复发风险,“NI-RADS≥3”的患者归为高复发风险。通过诊断准确性标准指标、诊断Odd’s ratio (DOR)和汇总接收者操作者特征(SROC)曲线分析的加权池化评价NI-RADS的诊断性能。结果在确定的1632条记录中,纳入了8项研究,7个数据集,1200多名患者和1300多张F-18 FDG PET/CT扫描。所有研究均为回顾性研究,存在偏倚、发表偏倚和数据异质性风险。从治疗到F-18 FDG PET/CT评估时间为8-17周。对于合并部位(原发、淋巴结或远处部位),“NIRADS≥3”比“NIRADS≤2”检测复发的能力是可接受的,其综合敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性似是比分别为0.68(95%置信区间,CI 0.63-0.73)、0.90 (95% CI, 0.88-0.92)、6.01 (95% CI, 2.9 - 12.6)和0.47 (95% CI, 0.31 - 0.71), DOR为14.13 (95% CI, 9.78-20.42),曲线下面积,AUC为0.859(标准误差,结论在治疗后HNSCC患者的F-18 FDG PET/CT中,在检测原发性、淋巴结或远处联合治疗失败或复发方面,NIRADS≥3类优于NIRADS≤2类的诊断效果是可以接受的,但证据的确定性较低。在HNSCC患者治疗后的F-18 FDG PET/CT扫描中,应常规报告NIRADS分类,特别是NIRADS≥3和NIRADS≤2。(未收到资助;普洛斯彼罗。CRD42022376017)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
392
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.
期刊最新文献
Ternary classification prediction and heterogeneity quantification for HER2-Zero, -low, and -positive in breast cancer using HER2-targeted PET/CT imaging. Amino acid PET imaging to monitor mIDH inhibitor treatments in patients with refractory IDH-mutant gliomas. Translational perspective on myocardial αvβ3-integrin imaging after infarction. Enhanced accuracy of cardiac 82Rb PET functional parameters with 16-compared to 8-gated imaging on a long-axial-field-of-view PET system: validation against echocardiography. Assessment of nephrotoxicity following lutetium-177 PSMA I&T radioligand therapy: a comparative study with docetaxel chemotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1