A Study of the Optimum Injection Rate of CO2-Saturated Brine in Limestone Aquifers and Its Impact on Rock Geomechanics

IF 5.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Energy & Fuels Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c04869
Elvin Mirzayev, Mustafa Al Ramadan*, Murtada Saleh Aljawad*, Ahmed Farid Ibrahim, Zuhair Al-Yousif and Ahmed Al Yaseri, 
{"title":"A Study of the Optimum Injection Rate of CO2-Saturated Brine in Limestone Aquifers and Its Impact on Rock Geomechanics","authors":"Elvin Mirzayev,&nbsp;Mustafa Al Ramadan*,&nbsp;Murtada Saleh Aljawad*,&nbsp;Ahmed Farid Ibrahim,&nbsp;Zuhair Al-Yousif and Ahmed Al Yaseri,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c04869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Deep saline aquifers are promising locations for carbon sequestration, but the impact of the CO<sub>2</sub> injection rate on rock properties requires careful investigation. This study examines the effects of CO<sub>2</sub>-saturated brine injection on limestone, specifically analyzing how the injection rate influences wormhole formation and subsequent changes in petrophysical and geomechanical properties. Various injection rates were employed to investigate the impact of the injection rate, ranging from 0.25 to 5 cm<sup>3</sup>/min, for the coreflooding experiments. Before and after coreflooding, the Young’s modulus (YM) and Poisson’s ratio of the samples were measured at various confining pressures. Additionally, the porosity and the permeability of the treated samples were assessed. A micro-CT scan was employed to visualize the generated wormholes and quantify their volumes to calculate the Damkohler number. Our study revealed that among the five tested injection rates 1 cm<sup>3</sup>/min resulted in the lowest pore volumes to breakthrough (PVBT). We employed the Buijse and Glasbergen model, curve-fitting our data to determine the optimum velocity for CO<sub>2</sub>-saturated brine, which was found to be 0.4 cm/min (equivalent to an injection rate of 0.75 cm<sup>3</sup>/min). All samples showed a noticeable change in rock YM, with the rock exposed to a 5 cm<sup>3</sup>/min injection rate showing the least reduction. Furthermore, our experiments revealed that conventional methods for determining the optimum conditions for wormhole formation, such as the Buijse and Glasbergen model and the generalized curve using the Damkohler number, are insufficient for accurately predicting wormhole formation in CO<sub>2</sub>-saturated brine. The experiments demonstrated a significant deviation from the expected behavior in terms of the generalized curve. Additionally, the Buijse and Glasbergen model overestimated PVBT at interstitial velocities lower than the predicted optimum. These findings underscore the need for alternative approaches to accurately predict wormholing phenomena, specifically in CO<sub>2</sub> storage applications, where the brine is saturated with CO<sub>2</sub>.</p>","PeriodicalId":35,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Fuels","volume":"39 12","pages":"5754–5766 5754–5766"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c04869","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep saline aquifers are promising locations for carbon sequestration, but the impact of the CO2 injection rate on rock properties requires careful investigation. This study examines the effects of CO2-saturated brine injection on limestone, specifically analyzing how the injection rate influences wormhole formation and subsequent changes in petrophysical and geomechanical properties. Various injection rates were employed to investigate the impact of the injection rate, ranging from 0.25 to 5 cm3/min, for the coreflooding experiments. Before and after coreflooding, the Young’s modulus (YM) and Poisson’s ratio of the samples were measured at various confining pressures. Additionally, the porosity and the permeability of the treated samples were assessed. A micro-CT scan was employed to visualize the generated wormholes and quantify their volumes to calculate the Damkohler number. Our study revealed that among the five tested injection rates 1 cm3/min resulted in the lowest pore volumes to breakthrough (PVBT). We employed the Buijse and Glasbergen model, curve-fitting our data to determine the optimum velocity for CO2-saturated brine, which was found to be 0.4 cm/min (equivalent to an injection rate of 0.75 cm3/min). All samples showed a noticeable change in rock YM, with the rock exposed to a 5 cm3/min injection rate showing the least reduction. Furthermore, our experiments revealed that conventional methods for determining the optimum conditions for wormhole formation, such as the Buijse and Glasbergen model and the generalized curve using the Damkohler number, are insufficient for accurately predicting wormhole formation in CO2-saturated brine. The experiments demonstrated a significant deviation from the expected behavior in terms of the generalized curve. Additionally, the Buijse and Glasbergen model overestimated PVBT at interstitial velocities lower than the predicted optimum. These findings underscore the need for alternative approaches to accurately predict wormholing phenomena, specifically in CO2 storage applications, where the brine is saturated with CO2.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
石灰岩含水层饱和co2盐水最佳注入速率及其对岩石地质力学的影响
深层咸水层是封存碳的理想地点,但二氧化碳注入速率对岩石性质的影响需要仔细研究。本研究考察了饱和co2盐水注入对石灰岩的影响,具体分析了注入速率如何影响虫孔的形成以及随后岩石物理和地质力学性质的变化。在岩心驱替实验中,采用了不同的注入速率(0.25 ~ 5 cm3/min)来研究注入速率的影响。在不同围压下,测量了岩心驱替前后样品的杨氏模量(YM)和泊松比。此外,还评估了处理后样品的孔隙度和渗透率。利用微型ct扫描可视化生成的虫孔,并量化其体积以计算Damkohler数。我们的研究表明,在5种测试的注入速度中,1 cm3/min的注入速度导致了最低的孔隙体积突破(PVBT)。我们采用Buijse和Glasbergen模型,对我们的数据进行曲线拟合,以确定co2饱和盐水的最佳流速,发现其为0.4 cm/min(相当于0.75 cm3/min的注入速率)。所有样品的岩石YM都发生了明显的变化,岩石暴露在5 cm3/min的注入速度下,其降低幅度最小。此外,我们的实验表明,用于确定虫孔形成最佳条件的传统方法,如Buijse和Glasbergen模型以及使用Damkohler数的广义曲线,不足以准确预测co2饱和盐水中虫孔的形成。实验表明,在广义曲线方面,与预期行为有很大的偏差。此外,Buijse和Glasbergen模型高估了间隙速度下的PVBT,低于预测的最佳速度。这些发现强调了准确预测虫孔现象的替代方法的必要性,特别是在二氧化碳储存应用中,盐水中含有饱和的二氧化碳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy & Fuels
Energy & Fuels 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
13.20%
发文量
1101
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Energy & Fuels publishes reports of research in the technical area defined by the intersection of the disciplines of chemistry and chemical engineering and the application domain of non-nuclear energy and fuels. This includes research directed at the formation of, exploration for, and production of fossil fuels and biomass; the properties and structure or molecular composition of both raw fuels and refined products; the chemistry involved in the processing and utilization of fuels; fuel cells and their applications; and the analytical and instrumental techniques used in investigations of the foregoing areas.
期刊最新文献
Constructing Localized Distribution and Orientation of Graphite Flakes to Achieve Enhanced Thermal Conductivity in Phase Change Composites for Thermal Energy Utilization Synergistic Redox-Acid Functionality in Mixed-Metal Polyoxometalate–TiO2 Catalysts for Fuel Additive Production One-Dimensional Rod-Structured Cryptomelane α-MnO2/2H-MoSe2/Polypyrrole Hybrid as an Efficient Counter Electrode for Natural DSSCs Dimethyl Carbonate/Methyl Octanoate/Methyl Decanoate Additions on Laminar Burning Velocity and Instability of Ammonia Composite Combustion Hydrothermal Co-Liquefaction of Lignite and Oak Biomass in the Presence of Formic Acid as a Hydrogen Precursor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1