Comparison of the postoperative effect of low laser therapy and platelet rich fibrin on mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized study.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE BMC Oral Health Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1186/s12903-025-05828-3
Beste Erismen Agan, Lokman Onur Uyanık, Ceren Melahat Donmezer
{"title":"Comparison of the postoperative effect of low laser therapy and platelet rich fibrin on mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized study.","authors":"Beste Erismen Agan, Lokman Onur Uyanık, Ceren Melahat Donmezer","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-05828-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigates the postoperative benefits of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in enhancing patient comfort and reducing complications after mandibular third molar extractions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty patients with vertically impacted mandibular third molars were randomly assigned to one control and three test groups (n = 15 each). In Group 1, PRF was applied to the socket post-extraction. In Group 2, PRF was combined with LLLT (B-Cure Dental Laser, 808 nm wavelength, 4 J/cm² energy density, continuous wave) applied extra-orally for three days post-surgery. Group 3 received LLLT alone. Group 4 (control group) underwent traditional osteotomy without additional treatments. All patients were prescribed 875/125 mg amoxicillin/clavulanic acid twice daily for five days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative parameters such as pain, swelling, analgesic use, and trismus were assessed on days 1, 2, 3, and 7. Significant improvements in pain, swelling, and trismus were observed in Groups 2 and 3 compared to the control (p < 0.001). Swelling was also significantly reduced in Group 1 compared to the control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes in the LLLT and PRF groups, suggesting that both treatments could be promising strategies for improving postoperative recovery in terms of comfort and reduced complications.</p><p><strong>Trial registiration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT06262945. The trial was first registered on 16/02/2024. Retrospectively registered.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"427"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11934512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05828-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study investigates the postoperative benefits of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in enhancing patient comfort and reducing complications after mandibular third molar extractions.

Methods: Sixty patients with vertically impacted mandibular third molars were randomly assigned to one control and three test groups (n = 15 each). In Group 1, PRF was applied to the socket post-extraction. In Group 2, PRF was combined with LLLT (B-Cure Dental Laser, 808 nm wavelength, 4 J/cm² energy density, continuous wave) applied extra-orally for three days post-surgery. Group 3 received LLLT alone. Group 4 (control group) underwent traditional osteotomy without additional treatments. All patients were prescribed 875/125 mg amoxicillin/clavulanic acid twice daily for five days.

Results: Postoperative parameters such as pain, swelling, analgesic use, and trismus were assessed on days 1, 2, 3, and 7. Significant improvements in pain, swelling, and trismus were observed in Groups 2 and 3 compared to the control (p < 0.001). Swelling was also significantly reduced in Group 1 compared to the control.

Conclusions: The study demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes in the LLLT and PRF groups, suggesting that both treatments could be promising strategies for improving postoperative recovery in terms of comfort and reduced complications.

Trial registiration: Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT06262945. The trial was first registered on 16/02/2024. Retrospectively registered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低激光治疗与富血小板纤维蛋白治疗下颌第三磨牙术后疗效比较:一项随机研究。
背景:本研究探讨低水平激光治疗(LLLT)和富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)在提高下颌第三磨牙拔牙术后患者舒适度和减少并发症方面的益处。方法:60例下颌垂直阻生第三磨牙患者随机分为1个对照组和3个试验组,每组15例。在组1中,将PRF应用于牙槽拔出后。第二组PRF联合LLLT (B-Cure Dental Laser,波长808 nm,能量密度4 J/cm²,连续波),术后3天口服。第三组单独接受LLLT治疗。第4组(对照组)行传统截骨术,不加其他治疗。所有患者均给予875/125 mg阿莫西林/克拉维酸,每日2次,连用5天。结果:在第1、2、3、7天评估术后疼痛、肿胀、止痛药使用和牙关等参数。与对照组相比,第2组和第3组疼痛、肿胀和牙关明显改善(p)。结论:研究表明,LLLT和PRF组的临床结果良好,表明这两种治疗方法在改善术后恢复舒适度和减少并发症方面可能是有希望的策略。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT06262945。该试验于2024年2月16日首次注册。回顾注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Oral health care interventions on objective indicators of oral frailty in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Analysis of mandibular trabecular bone by fractal analysis in children born with oral cleft. Patient satisfaction following orthodontic treatment and its association with ABO Model Grading System: a cross-sectional study. Push-out bond strength of CAD/CAM-fabricated modified PEEK dental posts. Predictors for complications and the removal of osteosynthesis material after mandibular fractures: a retrospective analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1