Lucie Lipková, Ivan Struhár, Jakub Krajňák, Dominik Puda, Michal Kumstát
{"title":"Field-based tests for determining critical speed among runners and its practical application: a systematic review.","authors":"Lucie Lipková, Ivan Struhár, Jakub Krajňák, Dominik Puda, Michal Kumstát","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2025.1520914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This review focuses exclusively on field-based critical speed (CS) tests for runners, aiming to evaluate key testing conditions to optimize field-based assessments and their practical applications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases in July 2024 using terms like \"critical power,\" \"critical speed,\" \"testing,\" and \"field condition\" along with related keywords. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, studies were systematically identified, screened, assessed for eligibility, and evaluated for the validity, reliability, and applicability of field-based methods for determining CS in runners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From an initial pool of 450 studies, 19 met the inclusion criteria. The time trial (TT) test and the 3-minute all-out test (3MT) emerged as the most frequently used field-based methods, demonstrating high reliability when conducted under specific conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review demonstrates that while field-based CS testing is a practical alternative to lab-based assessments, obtaining reliable results relies on following recommended testing settings, particularly for TT tests. By outlining the practical applications and conditions necessary for accurate CS assessment, this review supports athletes and coaches in applying CS testing effectively to enhance training strategies and performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":"7 ","pages":"1520914"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11933073/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1520914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: This review focuses exclusively on field-based critical speed (CS) tests for runners, aiming to evaluate key testing conditions to optimize field-based assessments and their practical applications.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases in July 2024 using terms like "critical power," "critical speed," "testing," and "field condition" along with related keywords. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, studies were systematically identified, screened, assessed for eligibility, and evaluated for the validity, reliability, and applicability of field-based methods for determining CS in runners.
Results: From an initial pool of 450 studies, 19 met the inclusion criteria. The time trial (TT) test and the 3-minute all-out test (3MT) emerged as the most frequently used field-based methods, demonstrating high reliability when conducted under specific conditions.
Conclusion: This review demonstrates that while field-based CS testing is a practical alternative to lab-based assessments, obtaining reliable results relies on following recommended testing settings, particularly for TT tests. By outlining the practical applications and conditions necessary for accurate CS assessment, this review supports athletes and coaches in applying CS testing effectively to enhance training strategies and performance.
简介:本综述专门针对基于现场的临界速度(CS)测试,旨在评估关键测试条件,以优化基于现场的评估及其实际应用。方法:于2024年7月系统检索PubMed、Scopus、SPORTDiscus和Web of Science数据库,使用“临界功率”、“临界速度”、“测试”、“现场条件”等关键词及相关关键词。遵循PRISMA 2020指南,系统地识别、筛选、评估研究的资格,并评估基于现场的方法的有效性、可靠性和适用性,以确定跑步者的CS。结果:在最初的450项研究中,有19项符合纳入标准。计时赛(TT)测试和3分钟全力测试(3MT)是最常用的现场方法,在特定条件下进行时具有很高的可靠性。结论:本综述表明,虽然现场CS检测是实验室评估的一种实用替代方法,但获得可靠结果依赖于以下推荐的检测设置,特别是TT检测。通过概述准确的CS评估的实际应用和必要条件,本综述支持运动员和教练员有效地应用CS测试来提高训练策略和成绩。