Field-based tests for determining critical speed among runners and its practical application: a systematic review.

IF 2.6 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2025-03-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2025.1520914
Lucie Lipková, Ivan Struhár, Jakub Krajňák, Dominik Puda, Michal Kumstát
{"title":"Field-based tests for determining critical speed among runners and its practical application: a systematic review.","authors":"Lucie Lipková, Ivan Struhár, Jakub Krajňák, Dominik Puda, Michal Kumstát","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2025.1520914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This review focuses exclusively on field-based critical speed (CS) tests for runners, aiming to evaluate key testing conditions to optimize field-based assessments and their practical applications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases in July 2024 using terms like \"critical power,\" \"critical speed,\" \"testing,\" and \"field condition\" along with related keywords. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, studies were systematically identified, screened, assessed for eligibility, and evaluated for the validity, reliability, and applicability of field-based methods for determining CS in runners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From an initial pool of 450 studies, 19 met the inclusion criteria. The time trial (TT) test and the 3-minute all-out test (3MT) emerged as the most frequently used field-based methods, demonstrating high reliability when conducted under specific conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review demonstrates that while field-based CS testing is a practical alternative to lab-based assessments, obtaining reliable results relies on following recommended testing settings, particularly for TT tests. By outlining the practical applications and conditions necessary for accurate CS assessment, this review supports athletes and coaches in applying CS testing effectively to enhance training strategies and performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":"7 ","pages":"1520914"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11933073/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1520914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This review focuses exclusively on field-based critical speed (CS) tests for runners, aiming to evaluate key testing conditions to optimize field-based assessments and their practical applications.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases in July 2024 using terms like "critical power," "critical speed," "testing," and "field condition" along with related keywords. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, studies were systematically identified, screened, assessed for eligibility, and evaluated for the validity, reliability, and applicability of field-based methods for determining CS in runners.

Results: From an initial pool of 450 studies, 19 met the inclusion criteria. The time trial (TT) test and the 3-minute all-out test (3MT) emerged as the most frequently used field-based methods, demonstrating high reliability when conducted under specific conditions.

Conclusion: This review demonstrates that while field-based CS testing is a practical alternative to lab-based assessments, obtaining reliable results relies on following recommended testing settings, particularly for TT tests. By outlining the practical applications and conditions necessary for accurate CS assessment, this review supports athletes and coaches in applying CS testing effectively to enhance training strategies and performance.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定跑步者临界速度的实地测试及其实际应用:系统回顾。
简介:本综述专门针对基于现场的临界速度(CS)测试,旨在评估关键测试条件,以优化基于现场的评估及其实际应用。方法:于2024年7月系统检索PubMed、Scopus、SPORTDiscus和Web of Science数据库,使用“临界功率”、“临界速度”、“测试”、“现场条件”等关键词及相关关键词。遵循PRISMA 2020指南,系统地识别、筛选、评估研究的资格,并评估基于现场的方法的有效性、可靠性和适用性,以确定跑步者的CS。结果:在最初的450项研究中,有19项符合纳入标准。计时赛(TT)测试和3分钟全力测试(3MT)是最常用的现场方法,在特定条件下进行时具有很高的可靠性。结论:本综述表明,虽然现场CS检测是实验室评估的一种实用替代方法,但获得可靠结果依赖于以下推荐的检测设置,特别是TT检测。通过概述准确的CS评估的实际应用和必要条件,本综述支持运动员和教练员有效地应用CS测试来提高训练策略和成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sport-specific demands on sustained attention in elite athletes: a novel within-subjects approach for investigation. The effect of trait mindfulness on rumination in college students: the mediating role of physical exercise behavior and optimistic intelligence quotient. Systematic review of undeclared prohibited substances and pharmacological adulterants in dietary supplements: prevalence, detection, and risks in sport. Development of physical literacy in school children and adolescents through the intervention of a multicomponent program of physical activity in the natural environment. Core neuromuscular co-activation mechanisms partly explain trunk kinematics in a perturbed postural task.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1