Exploring the Current Status of Risk Stratification in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: From Risk Models to Promising Techniques.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.3390/jcdd12030101
Alexandros Kasiakogias, Christos Kaskoutis, Christos-Konstantinos Antoniou, Stavros Georgopoulos, Dimitrios Tsiachris, Petros Arsenos, Alexandrina Kouroutzoglou, Dimitrios Klettas, Charalambos Vlachopoulos, Konstantinos Tsioufis, Konstantinos Gatzoulis
{"title":"Exploring the Current Status of Risk Stratification in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: From Risk Models to Promising Techniques.","authors":"Alexandros Kasiakogias, Christos Kaskoutis, Christos-Konstantinos Antoniou, Stavros Georgopoulos, Dimitrios Tsiachris, Petros Arsenos, Alexandrina Kouroutzoglou, Dimitrios Klettas, Charalambos Vlachopoulos, Konstantinos Tsioufis, Konstantinos Gatzoulis","doi":"10.3390/jcdd12030101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Improving clinical prediction of sudden cardiac death is a crucial step in the management of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. However, finding the optimal method for risk evaluation has been challenging, given the complexity and the wide variation in clinical phenotypes. This is particularly important, as these patients are often of younger age and defibrillator implantation is associated with a low but tangible long-term risk of adverse events. A number of risk factors, including degree of hypertrophy, presence of syncope and family history of sudden cardiac death, have typically been considered to indicate a higher risk. The European risk score for prediction of sudden cardiac death is widely used; however, it may not apply well in patients with specific forms of the condition, such as those with extreme hypertrophy. Increasing evidence suggests that the presence and extent of myocardial fibrosis assessed with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging should be considered in clinical decision-making. Some research suggests that integrating electrophysiological studies into traditional risk assessment models may further optimize risk prediction and significantly improve accuracy in detecting high risk patients. Novel cardiac imaging techniques, better understanding of the genetic substrate and artificial intelligence-based algorithms may prove promising for risk refinement. The present review article provides an updated and in-depth viewpoint.</p>","PeriodicalId":15197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11943177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12030101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improving clinical prediction of sudden cardiac death is a crucial step in the management of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. However, finding the optimal method for risk evaluation has been challenging, given the complexity and the wide variation in clinical phenotypes. This is particularly important, as these patients are often of younger age and defibrillator implantation is associated with a low but tangible long-term risk of adverse events. A number of risk factors, including degree of hypertrophy, presence of syncope and family history of sudden cardiac death, have typically been considered to indicate a higher risk. The European risk score for prediction of sudden cardiac death is widely used; however, it may not apply well in patients with specific forms of the condition, such as those with extreme hypertrophy. Increasing evidence suggests that the presence and extent of myocardial fibrosis assessed with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging should be considered in clinical decision-making. Some research suggests that integrating electrophysiological studies into traditional risk assessment models may further optimize risk prediction and significantly improve accuracy in detecting high risk patients. Novel cardiac imaging techniques, better understanding of the genetic substrate and artificial intelligence-based algorithms may prove promising for risk refinement. The present review article provides an updated and in-depth viewpoint.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨肥厚性心肌病风险分层的现状:从风险模型到有前景的技术。
提高心源性猝死的临床预测是肥厚性心肌病患者治疗的关键一步。然而,考虑到复杂性和临床表型的广泛变化,寻找风险评估的最佳方法一直具有挑战性。这一点尤其重要,因为这些患者通常年龄较小,除颤器植入与不良事件的长期风险低但明显相关。许多危险因素,包括肥厚程度、是否有晕厥和心脏性猝死家族史,通常被认为是高危因素。欧洲风险评分被广泛用于预测心源性猝死;然而,它可能不适用于特定形式的患者,例如那些极度肥大的患者。越来越多的证据表明,在临床决策中应考虑心脏磁共振成像评估心肌纤维化的存在和程度。一些研究表明,将电生理研究纳入传统的风险评估模型,可以进一步优化风险预测,显著提高发现高危患者的准确性。新的心脏成像技术,更好地理解遗传基质和基于人工智能的算法可能被证明有希望改善风险。这篇综述文章提供了一个最新的和深入的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
381
期刊最新文献
Effect of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nurse-Led Secondary Prevention After Acute Coronary Syndrome: Bridging the Gender Gap in Cardiovascular Outcomes-A Sub-Analysis of the BEAT-HF Study. The Left Axillary Artery as an Alternative Inflow Source in Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Safety, Feasibility, and Mid-Term Outcomes. Saudi Secondary Prevention Survey Study in Patients with Prior Acute Myocardial Infarction (4S Registry): Study Design and Pilot Phase Results. Short-Term Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Coronary Syndrome with Cardiogenic Shock: Which Device to Choose?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1