Personalized prediction model for miscarriage: in-depth sperm DNA fragmentation.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1007/s10815-025-03445-1
Chun-I Lee, Tse-En Wang, Chien-Hong Chen, Chun-Chia Huang, Hui-Mei Tsao, Tsung-Hsien Lee, Tiencheng Arthur Chang, Cheng-Teng Hsu, Maw-Sheng Lee
{"title":"Personalized prediction model for miscarriage: in-depth sperm DNA fragmentation.","authors":"Chun-I Lee, Tse-En Wang, Chien-Hong Chen, Chun-Chia Huang, Hui-Mei Tsao, Tsung-Hsien Lee, Tiencheng Arthur Chang, Cheng-Teng Hsu, Maw-Sheng Lee","doi":"10.1007/s10815-025-03445-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We investigated how different types of sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) in males, in conjunction with varying levels of female reproductive potential, jointly impact ICSI outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 195 couples undergoing ICSI, categorizing them by normal or poor prognosis according to POSEIDON criteria. Female factors included age, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), and oocyte retrieval numbers. Male factors included semen parameters, total SDF, and specific double-strand breaks (DSBs). Reproductive outcomes were followed up at different gestational stages, including clinical pregnancy, early gestation failure, live birth, and miscarriage. Risk factors were identified using univariate and multivariable logistic regression, and their predictive power was assessed via the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the normal group, female factors were primarily associated with reproductive failures. Non-pregnancy cases had lower AMH (4 ng/mL vs. 3.2 ng/mL), and miscarriage cases had fewer oocytes retrieved (15 vs. 10.5). However, the risk factor profile was distinct in poor prognosis. Male factors, including reduced sperm motility (68% vs. 54.5%), lower normal sperm morphology (5.5% vs. 2.5%), and elevated DSBs (7.5% vs. 18.8%) were linked to miscarriage. DSBs presented as the independent predictor of miscarriage risk (odds ratio: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.04-1.36), with a DSB cutoff of 19% providing 81% accuracy in predicting miscarriage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Paternal effect is pronounced in women with poor prognosis, where elevated DSBs are linked to an increased risk of miscarriage. We propose a refined pipeline in which DSB testing is considered as initial evaluation before assisted reproductive treatments, especially for infertile couples with poor prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"1717-1727"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12167405/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03445-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We investigated how different types of sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) in males, in conjunction with varying levels of female reproductive potential, jointly impact ICSI outcomes.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 195 couples undergoing ICSI, categorizing them by normal or poor prognosis according to POSEIDON criteria. Female factors included age, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), and oocyte retrieval numbers. Male factors included semen parameters, total SDF, and specific double-strand breaks (DSBs). Reproductive outcomes were followed up at different gestational stages, including clinical pregnancy, early gestation failure, live birth, and miscarriage. Risk factors were identified using univariate and multivariable logistic regression, and their predictive power was assessed via the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results: In the normal group, female factors were primarily associated with reproductive failures. Non-pregnancy cases had lower AMH (4 ng/mL vs. 3.2 ng/mL), and miscarriage cases had fewer oocytes retrieved (15 vs. 10.5). However, the risk factor profile was distinct in poor prognosis. Male factors, including reduced sperm motility (68% vs. 54.5%), lower normal sperm morphology (5.5% vs. 2.5%), and elevated DSBs (7.5% vs. 18.8%) were linked to miscarriage. DSBs presented as the independent predictor of miscarriage risk (odds ratio: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.04-1.36), with a DSB cutoff of 19% providing 81% accuracy in predicting miscarriage.

Conclusion: Paternal effect is pronounced in women with poor prognosis, where elevated DSBs are linked to an increased risk of miscarriage. We propose a refined pipeline in which DSB testing is considered as initial evaluation before assisted reproductive treatments, especially for infertile couples with poor prognosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流产的个性化预测模型:深度精子DNA碎片化。
目的:我们研究了男性不同类型的精子DNA片段(SDF),以及不同水平的女性生殖潜力,如何共同影响ICSI结果。方法回顾性分析195对行ICSI的夫妇,根据POSEIDON标准将其分为预后正常和预后不良两类。女性因素包括年龄、抗勒氏杆菌激素(AMH)和卵母细胞回收数。男性因素包括精液参数、总SDF和特异性双链断裂(dsb)。在不同妊娠阶段随访生殖结局,包括临床妊娠、早孕失败、活产和流产。采用单变量和多变量logistic回归确定危险因素,并通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估其预测能力。结果:在正常组中,女性因素主要与生殖失败相关。非妊娠组AMH较低(4 ng/mL vs. 3.2 ng/mL),流产组取卵较少(15 vs. 10.5)。然而,不良预后的危险因素是不同的。男性因素,包括精子活力降低(68%对54.5%)、正常精子形态降低(5.5%对2.5%)和dsb升高(7.5%对18.8%)与流产有关。DSB被认为是流产风险的独立预测因子(优势比:1.19,95% CI: 1.04-1.36), DSB截止值为19%,预测流产的准确率为81%。结论:父亲的影响在预后不良的妇女中是明显的,其中dsb升高与流产风险增加有关。我们建议将DSB检测作为辅助生殖治疗前的初步评估,特别是对预后不良的不育夫妇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
286
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species. The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.
期刊最新文献
The mitochondrial signature of sperm motility loss: a study of mitophagy and apoptosis in asthenozoospermia. Pluripotency and cellular differentiation miRNAs expressed in human blastocoel fluid are associated with embryo quality. The role of mTOR signaling in regulating the quality of mammalian oocytes. Ovarian reserve testing: assessing oocyte quantity and quality. A preliminary investigation into the etiology of agar-like zona pellucida in human oocytes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1