{"title":"Visualization of Electrophysiologically Defined Superior Vena Cava-Right Atrium Junction With High-Resolution Mapping Using Atrial Extrastimulus","authors":"Masahiro Ishikura, Yoshiaki Kawase, Taiji Miyake, Hitoshi Matsuo","doi":"10.1111/jce.16659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Recent studies have identified diagonal conduction block lines at the electrophysiologically defined superior vena cava (SVC)-right atrium (RA) junction using three-dimensional mapping systems and reported the utility of SVCI using these lines. However, these block lines are not always observed, requiring the use of a conventional horizontal isolation approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to visualize the electrophysiologically defined SVC-RA junction using high-resolution mapping with atrial extrastimulus pacing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-five patients underwent high-resolution mapping during sinus rhythm (Sinus map) and extrastimulus pacing (S2 map) using a three-dimensional mapping system (CARTO 3, version 8). Slow conduction or conduction block along the SVC-RA junction was assessed by adjusting the lower threshold cut-off value in the “early meets late” analysis. The length of slow or conduction block lines was compared between the two maps.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The S2 map revealed significantly longer slow or conduction block lines compared to the Sinus map (52.5 ± 18.0 mm vs. 35.6 ± 16.1 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.0013). The adjusted lower threshold values were comparable between the two maps: 26.4 ± 3.7% for the S2 map and 25.2 ± 3.8% for the Sinus map (<i>p</i> = 0.2819). In the S2 map, a slow or block line covering more than half of the junction was observed in all patients. Furthermore, the sinus node was consistently located inferior to this line.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>High-resolution mapping with atrial extrastimulus pacing more clearly visualizes the SVC-RA junction, potentially enabling more effective SVCI and estimation of the sinus node location.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":"36 6","pages":"1406-1410"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jce.16659","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Recent studies have identified diagonal conduction block lines at the electrophysiologically defined superior vena cava (SVC)-right atrium (RA) junction using three-dimensional mapping systems and reported the utility of SVCI using these lines. However, these block lines are not always observed, requiring the use of a conventional horizontal isolation approach.
Objective
This study aimed to visualize the electrophysiologically defined SVC-RA junction using high-resolution mapping with atrial extrastimulus pacing.
Methods
Twenty-five patients underwent high-resolution mapping during sinus rhythm (Sinus map) and extrastimulus pacing (S2 map) using a three-dimensional mapping system (CARTO 3, version 8). Slow conduction or conduction block along the SVC-RA junction was assessed by adjusting the lower threshold cut-off value in the “early meets late” analysis. The length of slow or conduction block lines was compared between the two maps.
Results
The S2 map revealed significantly longer slow or conduction block lines compared to the Sinus map (52.5 ± 18.0 mm vs. 35.6 ± 16.1 mm, p = 0.0013). The adjusted lower threshold values were comparable between the two maps: 26.4 ± 3.7% for the S2 map and 25.2 ± 3.8% for the Sinus map (p = 0.2819). In the S2 map, a slow or block line covering more than half of the junction was observed in all patients. Furthermore, the sinus node was consistently located inferior to this line.
Conclusion
High-resolution mapping with atrial extrastimulus pacing more clearly visualizes the SVC-RA junction, potentially enabling more effective SVCI and estimation of the sinus node location.
背景:最近的研究使用三维制图系统在电生理学上定义的上腔静脉(SVC)-右心房(RA)交界处确定了对角传导阻滞线,并报道了使用这些线的SVCI的应用。然而,这些块线并不总是被观察到,需要使用传统的水平隔离方法。目的:本研究旨在利用心房外刺激起搏的高分辨率制图来可视化电生理学定义的SVC-RA连接。方法:25例患者在窦性心律(窦图)和刺激外起搏(S2图)期间使用三维制图系统(CARTO 3, version 8)进行高分辨率制图。在“早见晚”分析中,通过调整低阈值切断值来评估SVC-RA交界处的慢传导或传导阻滞。比较慢速阻滞线和传导阻滞线的长度。结果:S2图显示慢阻线或传导阻滞线较鼻窦图明显延长(52.5±18.0 mm vs 35.6±16.1 mm, p = 0.0013)。两图调整后的下阈值具有可比性:S2图为26.4±3.7%,窦图为25.2±3.8% (p = 0.2819)。在S2图中,所有患者均观察到覆盖一半以上交界的慢线或阻滞线。此外,窦结始终位于这条线的下方。结论:采用心房外刺激起搏的高分辨率制图更清晰地显示SVC-RA连接点,可能使SVCI和窦房结位置的估计更有效。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.