Availability of Women's Health Clinics, Primary Care Providers, and Women Veterans' Ratings of Care Experiences.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1007/s11606-025-09451-4
Danielle E Rose, Melissa M Farmer, Sabine M Oishi, Bevanne A Bean-Mayberry, Ismelda Canelo, Donna L Washington, Elizabeth M Yano
{"title":"Availability of Women's Health Clinics, Primary Care Providers, and Women Veterans' Ratings of Care Experiences.","authors":"Danielle E Rose, Melissa M Farmer, Sabine M Oishi, Bevanne A Bean-Mayberry, Ismelda Canelo, Donna L Washington, Elizabeth M Yano","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09451-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>VA strives to improve women Veterans' access to comprehensive care. We assessed if availability of specialized clinic arrangements for women or specialized providers (women's health primary care providers) was associated with women Veterans' ratings of primary care experiences.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross sectional.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>We linked patient-level survey data (Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients, FY 2017, n=4264) with primary care clinic-level data (Clinical Practice Organizational Survey, primary care module, 2017-2018, n=126) from clinics with ≥300 women Veterans.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Our dependent variables were derived from top ratings for items rating access, care coordination, comprehensiveness (behavioral health assessed), provider communication, and primary care provider. Our variables of interest were the availability of specialized clinic arrangements such as women's health clinics and specialized providers such as women's health primary care providers.</p><p><strong>Statistical analyses: </strong>We conducted multi-level, multivariate logistic regression predicting women Veterans' optimal ratings of care, controlling for patient-, clinic-, and area-level characteristics.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Women Veterans receiving care at general primary care clinics with no women's health primary care providers had a lower likelihood of rating provider communication as optimal (Adjusted Odds Ratio .60, 95%CI .45-.78) or rating the primary care provider as 9 or 10/10 (Adjusted Odds Ratio .61, 95%CI .42-.86). Women Veterans receiving care at VA sites with a gynecology clinic had a higher likelihood of rating access as optimal (Adjusted Odds Ratio 1.40, 95%CI 1.01-1.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study found that availability of women's health primary care providers in general primary care and availability of gynecology clinics were associated with higher likelihood of women Veterans rating care experiences as optimal. Almost all VA sites have women's health primary care providers available, increasing availability at every site remains an important goal. Relatively few VA community-based outpatient clinics offer gynecology clinics, offering opportunities for improved care experiences among women Veterans.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2593-2601"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12405116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09451-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objective: VA strives to improve women Veterans' access to comprehensive care. We assessed if availability of specialized clinic arrangements for women or specialized providers (women's health primary care providers) was associated with women Veterans' ratings of primary care experiences.

Design: Cross sectional.

Participants: We linked patient-level survey data (Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients, FY 2017, n=4264) with primary care clinic-level data (Clinical Practice Organizational Survey, primary care module, 2017-2018, n=126) from clinics with ≥300 women Veterans.

Main measures: Our dependent variables were derived from top ratings for items rating access, care coordination, comprehensiveness (behavioral health assessed), provider communication, and primary care provider. Our variables of interest were the availability of specialized clinic arrangements such as women's health clinics and specialized providers such as women's health primary care providers.

Statistical analyses: We conducted multi-level, multivariate logistic regression predicting women Veterans' optimal ratings of care, controlling for patient-, clinic-, and area-level characteristics.

Key results: Women Veterans receiving care at general primary care clinics with no women's health primary care providers had a lower likelihood of rating provider communication as optimal (Adjusted Odds Ratio .60, 95%CI .45-.78) or rating the primary care provider as 9 or 10/10 (Adjusted Odds Ratio .61, 95%CI .42-.86). Women Veterans receiving care at VA sites with a gynecology clinic had a higher likelihood of rating access as optimal (Adjusted Odds Ratio 1.40, 95%CI 1.01-1.94).

Conclusions: Our study found that availability of women's health primary care providers in general primary care and availability of gynecology clinics were associated with higher likelihood of women Veterans rating care experiences as optimal. Almost all VA sites have women's health primary care providers available, increasing availability at every site remains an important goal. Relatively few VA community-based outpatient clinics offer gynecology clinics, offering opportunities for improved care experiences among women Veterans.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇女保健诊所、初级保健提供者和妇女退伍军人护理经验评级的可用性。
背景/目的:VA努力改善女性退伍军人获得全面护理的机会。我们评估了为妇女安排的专门诊所或专门提供者(妇女保健初级保健提供者)的可用性是否与妇女退伍军人对初级保健经历的评分有关。设计:横断面。参与者:我们将患者层面的调查数据(患者医疗保健经历调查,2017财年,n=4264)与初级保健诊所层面的数据(临床实践组织调查,初级保健模块,2017-2018,n=126)联系起来,这些数据来自有300名以上女性退伍军人的诊所。主要测量方法:我们的因变量来源于评价获取、护理协调、综合性(行为健康评估)、提供者沟通和初级保健提供者项目的最高评分。我们感兴趣的变量是专门诊所安排的可用性,如妇女保健诊所和专门提供者,如妇女保健初级保健提供者。统计分析:我们进行了多层级、多变量的逻辑回归来预测女性退伍军人对护理的最佳评分,控制了患者、诊所和区域水平的特征。关键结果:女性退伍军人在没有女性保健初级保健提供者的普通初级保健诊所接受护理,将提供者沟通评为最佳(调整优势比为0.60,95%CI为0.45 - 0.78)或将初级保健提供者评为9或10/10(调整优势比为0.61,95%CI为0.42 - 0.86)的可能性较低。在有妇科诊所的退伍军人事务部接受治疗的女性退伍军人有更高的可能性评价获得最佳治疗(调整优势比1.40,95%CI 1.01-1.94)。结论:我们的研究发现,普通初级保健中妇女保健初级保健提供者的可用性和妇科诊所的可用性与女性退伍军人评价护理经历为最佳的可能性较高相关。几乎所有VA站点都有妇女保健初级保健提供者,增加每个站点的可用性仍然是一个重要目标。相对较少的退伍军人事务部社区门诊诊所提供妇科诊所,为女性退伍军人提供改善护理经验的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Comparing Revenue, Spending, and Charity Care Patterns Across Nonprofit, For-Profit, and Government Hospitals. Hospitalist Buprenorphine Prescribing Before and After X-Waiver Removal at an Academic Center. Effect of a Quality Improvement Project on Point-of-Care Ultrasound Utilization During Inpatient Cardiac Arrest. Mailed FIT for Colorectal Cancer Screening: What is the Role of Patient Navigation? Evaluation of Real-World Patient Engagement in a Remote Patient Monitoring for Hypertension Program.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1