Explainability Enhanced Machine Learning Model for Classifying Intellectual Disability and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder With Psychological Test Reports.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Korean Medical Science Pub Date : 2025-03-24 DOI:10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e26
Tong Min Kim, Young-Hoon Kim, Sung-Hee Song, In-Young Choi, Dai-Jin Kim, Taehoon Ko
{"title":"Explainability Enhanced Machine Learning Model for Classifying Intellectual Disability and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder With Psychological Test Reports.","authors":"Tong Min Kim, Young-Hoon Kim, Sung-Hee Song, In-Young Choi, Dai-Jin Kim, Taehoon Ko","doi":"10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychological test reports are essential in assessing intellectual functioning, aiding in diagnosing and treating intellectual disability (ID) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, these reports can have several problems because they are diverse, unstructured, subjective, and involve human errors. Additionally, physicians often do not read the entire report, and the number of reports is lower than that of diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed explainable predictive models for classifying IDs and ADHDs based on written reports to address these issues. The reports of 1,475 patients with IDs and ADHDs who underwent intelligence tests were used for the models. These models were developed by analyzing reports using natural language processing (NLP) and incorporating the physician's diagnosis for each report. We selected n-gram features from the models' results by extracting important features using SHapley Additive exPlanations and permutation importance to make the models explainable. Developing the n-gram feature-based original text search system compensated for the lack of human readability caused by NLP and enabled the reconstruction of human-readable texts from the selected n-gram features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum model accuracy was 0.92, and the 80 human-readable texts were restored from four models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results showed that the models could accurately classify IDs and ADHDs, even with a few reports. The models were also able to explain their predictions. The explainability-enhanced model can help physicians understand the classification process of IDs and ADHDs and provide evidence-based insights.</p>","PeriodicalId":16249,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","volume":"40 11","pages":"e26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932825/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e26","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Psychological test reports are essential in assessing intellectual functioning, aiding in diagnosing and treating intellectual disability (ID) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, these reports can have several problems because they are diverse, unstructured, subjective, and involve human errors. Additionally, physicians often do not read the entire report, and the number of reports is lower than that of diagnoses.

Methods: We developed explainable predictive models for classifying IDs and ADHDs based on written reports to address these issues. The reports of 1,475 patients with IDs and ADHDs who underwent intelligence tests were used for the models. These models were developed by analyzing reports using natural language processing (NLP) and incorporating the physician's diagnosis for each report. We selected n-gram features from the models' results by extracting important features using SHapley Additive exPlanations and permutation importance to make the models explainable. Developing the n-gram feature-based original text search system compensated for the lack of human readability caused by NLP and enabled the reconstruction of human-readable texts from the selected n-gram features.

Results: The maximum model accuracy was 0.92, and the 80 human-readable texts were restored from four models.

Conclusion: The results showed that the models could accurately classify IDs and ADHDs, even with a few reports. The models were also able to explain their predictions. The explainability-enhanced model can help physicians understand the classification process of IDs and ADHDs and provide evidence-based insights.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于心理测试报告的智力残疾和注意缺陷/多动障碍分类的可解释性增强机器学习模型。
背景:心理测试报告在评估智力功能,帮助诊断和治疗智力残疾(ID)和注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)方面是必不可少的。然而,这些报告可能存在一些问题,因为它们是多样化的、非结构化的、主观的,并且涉及人为错误。此外,医生通常不会阅读完整的报告,报告的数量低于诊断的数量。方法:基于书面报告,建立可解释的adhd和adhd分类预测模型来解决这些问题。这些模型使用了1475名患有认知障碍和注意力缺陷多动障碍的患者的报告,他们接受了智力测试。这些模型是通过使用自然语言处理(NLP)分析报告并结合医生对每个报告的诊断而开发的。我们从模型的结果中选择n-gram特征,通过使用SHapley加性解释和排列重要性提取重要特征,使模型具有可解释性。开发基于n-gram特征的原始文本搜索系统弥补了NLP导致的人类可读性的不足,并能够从选择的n-gram特征中重建人类可读的文本。结果:模型的最高准确率为0.92,从4个模型中恢复了80个人类可读文本。结论:该模型能够准确地对adhd和adhd进行分类,尽管报告较少。这些模型也能够解释它们的预测。可解释性增强模型可以帮助医生理解adhd和adhd的分类过程,并提供基于证据的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Korean Medical Science
Journal of Korean Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Korean Medical Science (JKMS) is an international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal of medicine published weekly in English. The Journal’s publisher is the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences (KAMS), Korean Medical Association (KMA). JKMS aims to publish evidence-based, scientific research articles from various disciplines of the medical sciences. The Journal welcomes articles of general interest to medical researchers especially when they contain original information. Articles on the clinical evaluation of drugs and other therapies, epidemiologic studies of the general population, studies on pathogenic organisms and toxic materials, and the toxicities and adverse effects of therapeutics are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Tailored Interventions on Suicidal Ideation Recovery: Addressing Hopelessness Among Economically Vulnerable Populations During COVID-19 Period. Travel Time to Healthcare and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Management in Korea: A Nationwide Retrospective Study. Performance and Cost-Efficiency of an MPT64 Assay for Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex in a Setting With Frequent Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Isolation. Revolutionizing Sectioned Images of the Visible Korean: Achieving From 0.05 mm to 0.03 mm Sized Pixel. Influence of Digital Literacy on Digital Health Usage Intention Among Patients With Cancer and Healthcare Providers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1