2024 Royal Australian College of General Practitioners and Healthy Bones Australia guideline for osteoporosis management and fracture prevention in postmenopausal women and men over 50 years of age

IF 8.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medical Journal of Australia Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI:10.5694/mja2.52637
Peter Wong, Weiwen Chen, Dan Ewald, Christian Girgis, Morton Rawlin, John Tsingos, Justine Waters
{"title":"2024 Royal Australian College of General Practitioners and Healthy Bones Australia guideline for osteoporosis management and fracture prevention in postmenopausal women and men over 50 years of age","authors":"Peter Wong,&nbsp;Weiwen Chen,&nbsp;Dan Ewald,&nbsp;Christian Girgis,&nbsp;Morton Rawlin,&nbsp;John Tsingos,&nbsp;Justine Waters","doi":"10.5694/mja2.52637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>This updated guideline replaces the previous Royal Australian College of General Practitioners and Osteoporosis Australia (now, Healthy Bones Australia) guideline from 2017. The accumulation of high quality evidence supporting improvements in clinical practice over the past five years, need for expert consensus and opinion, and new developments in pharmacological management of osteoporosis, especially the role of osteoanabolic therapies, prompted this update. The aim was to provide clear, evidence-based recommendations to assist Australian general practitioners in managing patients over 50 years of age with poor bone health. However, it is useful for any health care professional caring for people with poor bone health and for health administrators and bureaucrats responsible for resource provision and allocation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main recommendations</h3>\n \n <div>\n \n <ul>\n \n \n <li>Earlier recognition of poor bone health using clinical risk factors, and use of an absolute fracture risk assessment tool, particularly FRAX (https://fraxplus.org/), is encouraged.</li>\n \n \n <li>Widespread population-based osteoporosis screening is not recommended in Australia due to lack of supporting evidence.</li>\n \n \n <li>It is important to recognise patients with “imminent” or “very high” fracture risk, as this is a group in whom to consider early osteoanabolic therapy.</li>\n \n \n <li>Calcium and vitamin D supplementation are more effective in reducing fracture risk when given to individuals who have calcium and vitamin D deficiency (not to healthy non-institutionalised individuals).</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Changes in assessment and management as a result of the guideline</h3>\n \n <p>This guideline provides recommendations for the use of fracture risk assessment tools, particularly FRAX, for risk stratification, addresses the risk of rebound vertebral fracture following denosumab cessation, discusses removal of strontium as a therapy, clarifies “imminent” or “very high” fracture risk in patients and highlights the importance of calcium and vitamin D status, and the early use of osteoanabolic therapies. The full guideline is freely available at https://www.racgp.org.au/clinical-resources/clinical-guidelines/key-racgp-guidelines/view-all-racgp-guidelines/osteoporosis/executive-summary.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":"222 9","pages":"472-480"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52637","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52637","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This updated guideline replaces the previous Royal Australian College of General Practitioners and Osteoporosis Australia (now, Healthy Bones Australia) guideline from 2017. The accumulation of high quality evidence supporting improvements in clinical practice over the past five years, need for expert consensus and opinion, and new developments in pharmacological management of osteoporosis, especially the role of osteoanabolic therapies, prompted this update. The aim was to provide clear, evidence-based recommendations to assist Australian general practitioners in managing patients over 50 years of age with poor bone health. However, it is useful for any health care professional caring for people with poor bone health and for health administrators and bureaucrats responsible for resource provision and allocation.

Main recommendations

  • Earlier recognition of poor bone health using clinical risk factors, and use of an absolute fracture risk assessment tool, particularly FRAX (https://fraxplus.org/), is encouraged.
  • Widespread population-based osteoporosis screening is not recommended in Australia due to lack of supporting evidence.
  • It is important to recognise patients with “imminent” or “very high” fracture risk, as this is a group in whom to consider early osteoanabolic therapy.
  • Calcium and vitamin D supplementation are more effective in reducing fracture risk when given to individuals who have calcium and vitamin D deficiency (not to healthy non-institutionalised individuals).

Changes in assessment and management as a result of the guideline

This guideline provides recommendations for the use of fracture risk assessment tools, particularly FRAX, for risk stratification, addresses the risk of rebound vertebral fracture following denosumab cessation, discusses removal of strontium as a therapy, clarifies “imminent” or “very high” fracture risk in patients and highlights the importance of calcium and vitamin D status, and the early use of osteoanabolic therapies. The full guideline is freely available at https://www.racgp.org.au/clinical-resources/clinical-guidelines/key-racgp-guidelines/view-all-racgp-guidelines/osteoporosis/executive-summary.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2024澳大利亚皇家全科医师学院和澳大利亚健康骨骼学院关于绝经后女性和50岁以上男性骨质疏松症管理和骨折预防的指南。
本指南从2017年起取代了之前的澳大利亚皇家全科医师学院和澳大利亚骨质疏松症(现为澳大利亚健康骨骼)指南。在过去的五年中,高质量证据的积累支持了临床实践的改进,需要专家的共识和意见,以及骨质疏松症药物管理的新进展,特别是骨合成代谢疗法的作用,促使了这一更新。目的是提供明确的、基于证据的建议,以帮助澳大利亚全科医生管理50岁以上骨骼健康状况不佳的患者。然而,它是有用的任何卫生保健专业人员照顾人与不良的骨骼健康和卫生行政人员和官僚负责资源的供应和分配。主要建议:鼓励使用临床危险因素早期识别骨骼健康状况不佳,并使用绝对骨折风险评估工具,特别是FRAX (https://fraxplus.org/)。由于缺乏证据支持,在澳大利亚不推荐广泛的基于人群的骨质疏松筛查。重要的是要认识到有“迫在眉睫”或“非常高”骨折风险的患者,因为这是一个需要考虑早期骨合成代谢治疗的群体。钙和维生素D补充剂对钙和维生素D缺乏症患者(而不是健康的非住院患者)更有效地降低骨折风险。该指南对骨折风险评估工具的使用,特别是FRAX,提供了风险分层的建议,解决了denosumab停用后椎体反弹骨折的风险,讨论了去除锶作为一种治疗方法,澄清了患者“迫在眉睫”或“非常高”的骨折风险,并强调钙和维生素D状态的重要性,以及早期使用骨合成代谢治疗。完整的指南可在https://www.racgp.org.au/clinical-resources/clinical-guidelines/key-racgp-guidelines/view-all-racgp-guidelines/osteoporosis/executive-summary免费获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Australia
Medical Journal of Australia 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
410
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.
期刊最新文献
Data for Equity: Can Linked Administrative Data Inform Pathways to More Equitable Child Health? A Diagnostic Headache. Victorian Public Hospitals Go 100% Renewable: Now Let's Replace Gas and Embrace Reusable Equipment. Antidepressant Prescribing in Australian Primary Care: Time to Reevaluate. Ngalaiya Boorai Gabara Budbut: A Qualitative Study With Primary Care Providers to Understand Perceived Needs, Enablers, Barriers and Opportunities to Strengthen Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1