Prevalence and concordance of HER2-low and HER2-ultralow status between historical and rescored results in a multicentre study of breast cancer patients in China.

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine Breast Cancer Research Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1186/s13058-025-02001-0
Hong Lv, Junqiu Yue, Qingfu Zhang, Fangping Xu, Peng Gao, Haifeng Yang, Xiu Nie, Lingfei Kong, Guanjun Zhang, Jianming Li, Shiwei Xiao, Hongmei Wu, Aiyan Xing, Min Hong, Jun Fan, Huijuan Guan, Peilong Cao, Hengli Ni, Wentao Yang
{"title":"Prevalence and concordance of HER2-low and HER2-ultralow status between historical and rescored results in a multicentre study of breast cancer patients in China.","authors":"Hong Lv, Junqiu Yue, Qingfu Zhang, Fangping Xu, Peng Gao, Haifeng Yang, Xiu Nie, Lingfei Kong, Guanjun Zhang, Jianming Li, Shiwei Xiao, Hongmei Wu, Aiyan Xing, Min Hong, Jun Fan, Huijuan Guan, Peilong Cao, Hengli Ni, Wentao Yang","doi":"10.1186/s13058-025-02001-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurately assessing HER2-low (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 1 + and IHC 2+/in situ hybridization [ISH]-) and HER2-ultralow (IHC > 0 < 1+) is essential given the emergence of novel therapies. Thorough understanding of the reproducibility of rescoring IHC stained slides or re-staining archived tissue slides is essential.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>2,869 breast cancer patients diagnosed between July 2021 and July 2022 from 10 hospitals in China were included in this multicentre study. The prevalence of different HER2 expression levels and distribution of HER2 IHC scores were assessed by HER2 status determination from rescored historical slides. Concordance was evaluated across historical results versus rescored results, historical results versus re-stained results, and leading center results versus local site results. Clinicopathological characteristics were retrospectively analyzed as well.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HER2 IHC 0, IHC 1+, IHC 2+, and IHC 3 + were identified in 682 (23.8%), 871 (30.4%), 801 (27.9%), and 515 (18.0%) cases, respectively. HER2-positive, HER2-low, and HER2 IHC 0 (HER2-ultralow and IHC null) were identified in 21.7%, 54.5%, and 23.8% of cases, respectively. The prevalence of HER2-ultralow and IHC null was 10.6% and 13.2%, respectively. The concordance for HER2-ultralow was 43.3%; 30% of cases that were scored as HER2-ultralow at local sites were rescored as HER2-null and 26.7% of cases were rescored as IHC 1 + at the leading site. Overall, there was substantial agreement (83.1%) between rescored and historical IHC results. A high concordance rate of 91.7% was observed for HER2-low classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first multicenter study to determine the prevalence of HER2-low and HER2-ultralow based on rescored results in the Chinese breast cancer population. The concordance analysis carries important implications for the diagnosis of HER2-low and HER2-ultralow cases in clinical practice. The relatively low concordance in identifying HER2-ultralow suggested that the reproducibility of scoring HER2-ultralow needed to be improved through training.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05203458.</p>","PeriodicalId":49227,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research","volume":"27 1","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11934669/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-025-02001-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurately assessing HER2-low (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 1 + and IHC 2+/in situ hybridization [ISH]-) and HER2-ultralow (IHC > 0 < 1+) is essential given the emergence of novel therapies. Thorough understanding of the reproducibility of rescoring IHC stained slides or re-staining archived tissue slides is essential.

Methods: 2,869 breast cancer patients diagnosed between July 2021 and July 2022 from 10 hospitals in China were included in this multicentre study. The prevalence of different HER2 expression levels and distribution of HER2 IHC scores were assessed by HER2 status determination from rescored historical slides. Concordance was evaluated across historical results versus rescored results, historical results versus re-stained results, and leading center results versus local site results. Clinicopathological characteristics were retrospectively analyzed as well.

Results: HER2 IHC 0, IHC 1+, IHC 2+, and IHC 3 + were identified in 682 (23.8%), 871 (30.4%), 801 (27.9%), and 515 (18.0%) cases, respectively. HER2-positive, HER2-low, and HER2 IHC 0 (HER2-ultralow and IHC null) were identified in 21.7%, 54.5%, and 23.8% of cases, respectively. The prevalence of HER2-ultralow and IHC null was 10.6% and 13.2%, respectively. The concordance for HER2-ultralow was 43.3%; 30% of cases that were scored as HER2-ultralow at local sites were rescored as HER2-null and 26.7% of cases were rescored as IHC 1 + at the leading site. Overall, there was substantial agreement (83.1%) between rescored and historical IHC results. A high concordance rate of 91.7% was observed for HER2-low classification.

Conclusions: This is the first multicenter study to determine the prevalence of HER2-low and HER2-ultralow based on rescored results in the Chinese breast cancer population. The concordance analysis carries important implications for the diagnosis of HER2-low and HER2-ultralow cases in clinical practice. The relatively low concordance in identifying HER2-ultralow suggested that the reproducibility of scoring HER2-ultralow needed to be improved through training.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05203458.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国乳腺癌患者多中心研究中her2 -低和her2 -超低状态的历史和恢复结果的患病率和一致性
背景:准确评估her2低(免疫组织化学[IHC] 1 +和IHC 2+/原位杂交[ISH]-)和her2超低(IHC >)方法:该多中心研究纳入了2021年7月至2022年7月期间来自中国10家医院诊断的2,869例乳腺癌患者。不同HER2表达水平的患病率和HER2 IHC评分的分布通过重新记录的历史载玻片测定HER2状态来评估。对历史结果与恢复结果、历史结果与重新染色结果、主导中心结果与局部结果进行一致性评估。回顾性分析临床病理特征。结果:HER2 IHC 0、IHC 1+、IHC 2+、IHC 3 +分别检出682例(23.8%)、871例(30.4%)、801例(27.9%)、515例(18.0%)。HER2阳性、HER2低和HER2 IHC 0 (HER2超低和IHC零)分别在21.7%、54.5%和23.8%的病例中被发现。her2超低和IHC无效的患病率分别为10.6%和13.2%。her2 -超低的一致性为43.3%;30%的局部位点her2超低的病例恢复为her2零,26.7%的病例恢复为领先位点的IHC 1 +。总体而言,恢复的结果与历史的IHC结果有很大的一致性(83.1%)。her2低分类的符合率高达91.7%。结论:这是第一个基于中国乳腺癌人群中her2 -低和her2 -超低发生率的多中心研究。一致性分析对临床诊断her2 -低和her2 -超低病例具有重要意义。鉴定her2 -超低的一致性较低,提示需通过训练提高her2 -超低评分的可重复性。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT05203458。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research, an international, peer-reviewed online journal, publishes original research, reviews, editorials, and reports. It features open-access research articles of exceptional interest across all areas of biology and medicine relevant to breast cancer. This includes normal mammary gland biology, with a special emphasis on the genetic, biochemical, and cellular basis of breast cancer. In addition to basic research, the journal covers preclinical, translational, and clinical studies with a biological basis, including Phase I and Phase II trials.
期刊最新文献
CXCL12/ZNF503/GATA3/MMP1 axis promotes tumor progression and metastasis of triple-negative breast cancer. Deubiquitination and stabilization of EIF4A3 by OTUB2 contributes to TPI1-mediated glycolysis and TNBC progression. Breast cancer mortality among women who have attended BreastScreen Norway, 1996-2023. AI-enhanced precision: boosting pathologist confidence in HER2 ultra-low diagnosis through intelligent re-screening. TLScope: a deep learning framework for quantifying tertiary lymphoid structures from H&E images reveals prognostic heterogeneity across breast cancer subtypes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1