A Novel Streamlined Triphasic Approach to Training Pediatric Emergency Staff for Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Access

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Journal of Emergency Nursing Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jen.2025.02.009
Benjamin K. Nti MD, MSc, Pamela Soriano MD, MBA, Sean Mulligan MD, Emily Dever MSN, RN, PCNS-BC, CPEN, Tresanay Bentley NR-P, CPST-I, Elizabeth Weinstein MD
{"title":"A Novel Streamlined Triphasic Approach to Training Pediatric Emergency Staff for Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Access","authors":"Benjamin K. Nti MD, MSc,&nbsp;Pamela Soriano MD, MBA,&nbsp;Sean Mulligan MD,&nbsp;Emily Dever MSN, RN, PCNS-BC, CPEN,&nbsp;Tresanay Bentley NR-P, CPST-I,&nbsp;Elizabeth Weinstein MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2025.02.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access enhances the clinical management of pediatric patients with difficult intravenous access. However, the quality and depth of the training required to master this skill can vary significantly. We instituted a novel curriculum to streamline the training process using a simplified 3-phase approach.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective observational study included emergency nurses and paramedics trained in ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous placement from October 2020 to November 2021. Pediatric emergency nurses and paramedics with experience and proficiency in standard peripheral intravenous placement were included. The training curriculum included 3 phases: (1) 3 hours of didactics, machine, and phantom training; (2) at least 10 supervised cannulations; and (3) 10 unsupervised cannulations in patients with difficult intravenous access. Participants were assessed at each phase and 6 months after the initial training.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty participants completed the training. The average years of experience was 6.37 years (standard error of mean 1.17). Likert rating of comfort level with ultrasound machine competency, vascular anatomy, image acquisition, interpretation, and clinical integration respectively increased significantly between the pretraining survey and post-training survey [2.83 (0.29) vs 4.07 (0.12); 2.83 (0.29) vs 4.30 (0.12); 2.33 (0.23) vs 4.22 (0.13); and 3.00 (0.34) vs 4.22 (0.18); <em>P</em> &lt; .05]. This was sustained for more than 6 months after training. We observed a concomitant decrease in peripheral intravenous attempts (standard 2.86 ± 0.22 vs ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous 1.2 ± 0.08). The training was valuable (4.9 ± 0.05) and changed clinical management (4.5 ± 0.20) of patients with difficult intravenous access.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>These findings support the integration of ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access as part of staff training to enhance pediatric emergency nurses’ paramedic cannulation skills and improve patient management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":"51 4","pages":"Pages 666-674"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099176725000637","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access enhances the clinical management of pediatric patients with difficult intravenous access. However, the quality and depth of the training required to master this skill can vary significantly. We instituted a novel curriculum to streamline the training process using a simplified 3-phase approach.

Methods

This prospective observational study included emergency nurses and paramedics trained in ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous placement from October 2020 to November 2021. Pediatric emergency nurses and paramedics with experience and proficiency in standard peripheral intravenous placement were included. The training curriculum included 3 phases: (1) 3 hours of didactics, machine, and phantom training; (2) at least 10 supervised cannulations; and (3) 10 unsupervised cannulations in patients with difficult intravenous access. Participants were assessed at each phase and 6 months after the initial training.

Results

Thirty participants completed the training. The average years of experience was 6.37 years (standard error of mean 1.17). Likert rating of comfort level with ultrasound machine competency, vascular anatomy, image acquisition, interpretation, and clinical integration respectively increased significantly between the pretraining survey and post-training survey [2.83 (0.29) vs 4.07 (0.12); 2.83 (0.29) vs 4.30 (0.12); 2.33 (0.23) vs 4.22 (0.13); and 3.00 (0.34) vs 4.22 (0.18); P < .05]. This was sustained for more than 6 months after training. We observed a concomitant decrease in peripheral intravenous attempts (standard 2.86 ± 0.22 vs ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous 1.2 ± 0.08). The training was valuable (4.9 ± 0.05) and changed clinical management (4.5 ± 0.20) of patients with difficult intravenous access.

Discussion

These findings support the integration of ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access as part of staff training to enhance pediatric emergency nurses’ paramedic cannulation skills and improve patient management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种新型流线型三段式超声引导外周静脉通路儿科急救人员培训方法。
导读:超声引导下的外周静脉通路提高了儿科静脉通路困难患者的临床管理水平。然而,掌握这项技能所需的训练的质量和深度可能会有很大差异。我们制定了一个新的课程,以简化的三个阶段的方法来简化培训过程。方法:本前瞻性观察研究纳入了2020年10月至2021年11月接受超声引导外周静脉置入术培训的急诊护士和护理人员。有经验和熟练掌握标准外周静脉滴注的儿科急诊护士和护理人员被纳入研究对象。培训课程包括三个阶段:(1)3小时的教学、机器和模拟训练;(二)至少10个监督插管;(3)静脉进入困难患者无监护插管10次。在每个阶段和初始训练后6个月对参与者进行评估。结果:30名参与者完成了培训。平均工作年限为6.37年(平均标准误差为1.17)。在超声机器能力、血管解剖、图像采集、解释和临床整合方面的Likert舒适度评分在训练前调查和训练后调查中分别显著提高[2.83(0.29)比4.07 (0.12)];2.83 (0.29) vs 4.30 (0.12);2.33 (0.23) vs 4.22 (0.13);3.00 (0.34) vs 4.22 (0.18);讨论:这些研究结果支持将超声引导下的外周静脉通路作为员工培训的一部分,以提高儿科急诊护士的护理插管技能并改善患者管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice. The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics. The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.
期刊最新文献
Increasing First-Attempt Success in Difficult Venous Access Patients Using Early Identification and Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Cannulation. Emergency Nursing Care of a Pregnant Patient With Acute Abdomen Owing to Acute Pancreatitis: A Case Report. Evaluating the Experiences of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersex, and Asexual Nurses in the Emergency Department Setting. Improving Emergency Nurse Preparedness for Mass Casualty Incidents: A Quality Improvement Project. Survival and Neurologic Performance at 30 Days and Beyond Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Comparing Standard Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Versus Chest Compression-Only Resuscitation by Bystanders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1