An Examination of Facilitators and Barriers to Care Receipt Among Specific Groups of LGBTQ+ and Cisgender Heterosexual Veterans.

IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1037/sgd0000820
Michelle Upham, Kristine Beaver, Cindy J Chang, Cory J Cascalheira, Isaac C Rhew, Kim DeFiori, Krista S Dashtestani, Michael R Kauth, Jillian C Shipherd, Debra Kaysen, Tracy L Simpson
{"title":"An Examination of Facilitators and Barriers to Care Receipt Among Specific Groups of LGBTQ+ and Cisgender Heterosexual Veterans.","authors":"Michelle Upham, Kristine Beaver, Cindy J Chang, Cory J Cascalheira, Isaac C Rhew, Kim DeFiori, Krista S Dashtestani, Michael R Kauth, Jillian C Shipherd, Debra Kaysen, Tracy L Simpson","doi":"10.1037/sgd0000820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study examined rates and factors associated with past-year Veterans Health Administration (VHA) overall healthcare utilization and VA mental health treatment among LGBTQ+ and cisgender heterosexual veterans. Baseline data from a national longitudinal study of LGBTQ+ and cisgender heterosexual veteran VHA users and non-users (N = 1,062) were used in generalized linear models to estimate the predicted prevalence of VHA healthcare utilization for each LGBTQ+ and cisgender subgroup, stratified by gender. Additional multivariable regressions were guided by the Andersen health services utilization model. There were no significant differences in healthcare utilization among women subgroups. Among men subgroups, cisgender gay men had lower predicted prevalence of VHA utilization than cisgender heterosexual and transgender men. In both the women's and men's models, VHA eligibility indicators and perceived lack of service availability were associated with increased odds for any past-year utilization; higher income, difficulty understanding eligibility/benefits, and logistical barriers were associated with decreased odds. Lifetime harassment at VHA was positively associated with past-year overall VHA utilization in women's models. LGBTQ+ specific factors explained significant variance in some models while transgender/gender diverse specific needs did not. These findings suggest that veterans generally need assistance navigating VHA eligibility issues and that LGBTQ+ veterans would benefit from systemic attention to provider sensitivity and availability of services focused on their needs. The high rates of harassment reported across women subgroups (19% to 25%) and by transgender men (38%) warrant institution-wide action.</p>","PeriodicalId":52125,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity","volume":"2025 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000820","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study examined rates and factors associated with past-year Veterans Health Administration (VHA) overall healthcare utilization and VA mental health treatment among LGBTQ+ and cisgender heterosexual veterans. Baseline data from a national longitudinal study of LGBTQ+ and cisgender heterosexual veteran VHA users and non-users (N = 1,062) were used in generalized linear models to estimate the predicted prevalence of VHA healthcare utilization for each LGBTQ+ and cisgender subgroup, stratified by gender. Additional multivariable regressions were guided by the Andersen health services utilization model. There were no significant differences in healthcare utilization among women subgroups. Among men subgroups, cisgender gay men had lower predicted prevalence of VHA utilization than cisgender heterosexual and transgender men. In both the women's and men's models, VHA eligibility indicators and perceived lack of service availability were associated with increased odds for any past-year utilization; higher income, difficulty understanding eligibility/benefits, and logistical barriers were associated with decreased odds. Lifetime harassment at VHA was positively associated with past-year overall VHA utilization in women's models. LGBTQ+ specific factors explained significant variance in some models while transgender/gender diverse specific needs did not. These findings suggest that veterans generally need assistance navigating VHA eligibility issues and that LGBTQ+ veterans would benefit from systemic attention to provider sensitivity and availability of services focused on their needs. The high rates of harassment reported across women subgroups (19% to 25%) and by transgender men (38%) warrant institution-wide action.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LGBTQ+和顺性异性恋退伍军人特殊群体护理接受的促进因素和障碍研究。
本研究调查了LGBTQ+和顺性异性恋退伍军人的退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)总体医疗保健利用率和VA心理健康治疗的相关率和因素。一项针对LGBTQ+和顺性异性恋退伍军人VHA使用者和非使用者(N = 1062)的全国性纵向研究的基线数据被用于泛化线性模型,以估计按性别分层的LGBTQ+和顺性异性恋退伍军人VHA医疗保健利用的预测患病率。附加的多变量回归以Andersen卫生服务利用模型为指导。妇女亚组在医疗保健利用方面无显著差异。在男性亚组中,顺性同性恋男性的VHA使用率低于顺性异性恋和变性男性。在女性和男性模型中,VHA资格指标和感知到的服务可用性缺乏与过去任何一年的利用率增加的可能性有关;较高的收入、难以理解资格/福利和后勤障碍与几率降低有关。VHA的终身骚扰与女性模特过去一年的VHA总体利用率呈正相关。LGBTQ+特定因素解释了某些模型的显著差异,而跨性别/性别多样化特定需求却不能解释。这些发现表明,退伍军人通常需要帮助来解决VHA资格问题,LGBTQ+退伍军人将受益于系统关注提供者的敏感性和针对他们需求的服务的可用性。女性亚群体(19%至25%)和跨性别男性(38%)报告的高骚扰率值得全机构采取行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity ®, the official publication of APA Division 44 (Society for the Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity), is a scholarly journal dedicated to the dissemination of information in the field of sexual orientation and gender diversity. It is a primary outlet for research particularly as it impacts practice, education, public policy, and social action. The journal is intended to be a forum for scholarly dialogue that explores the multifaceted aspects of sexual orientation and gender diversity. Its focus is on empirical research (both quantitative and qualitative), theoretical and conceptual articles, in-depth reviews of the research and literature, clinical case studies, book reviews, and letters to the editor. Many issues include a major article or set of articles on a specific theme of importance to theory, research, and/or practice in the psychology of sexual orientation and gender diversity. In addition, articles address professional issues, methodological and theoretical issues, and comments on previous publications in the journal as well as such topics that advance the psychological knowledge of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals and their families, couples and marriage, health and health care, aging, work, and careers. The journal includes all areas of psychological research, especially developmental, social, clinical, community, counseling, family, gender roles and gender nonconformity, lifespan and aging, cultural diversity including race and ethnicity, and international issues.
期刊最新文献
Structural Minority Stress Predicts Suicidality, Substance Use, and Sexual Risk Behaviors among Sexual Minority Adolescents. The Relationship Between Identity-Based Social Support, Victimization, and Mental Health among LGBTQ+ Youth. How masculinity and treatment impact posttraumatic stress disorder recovery in sexual minority men with sexual trauma: Findings from a randomized clinical trial. Narratives as Mirrors and Doors: A Multiple-Method Pilot Evaluation of an Online, Family-Level Intervention for Families With Transgender and/or Nonbinary Youth. Alcohol and cannabis cessation and reduction attempts and outcomes among sexual minority women and gender diverse individuals assigned female at birth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1