AI-augmented physics-based docking for antibody-antigen complex prediction.

Francis Gaudreault, Traian Sulea, Christopher R Corbeil
{"title":"AI-augmented physics-based docking for antibody-antigen complex prediction.","authors":"Francis Gaudreault, Traian Sulea, Christopher R Corbeil","doi":"10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Motivation: </strong>Predicting the structure of antibody-antigen complexes is a challenging task with significant implications for the design of better antibody therapeutics. However, the levels of success have remained dauntingly low, particularly when high standards for model quality are required, a necessity for efficient antibody design. Artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly impacted the landscape of structure prediction for antibodies, both alone and in complex with their antigens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized AI-guided antibody modeling tools to generate ensembles displaying diversity in the complementarity-determining region (CDR) and integrated those into our previously published AlphaFold2-rescored docking pipeline, a strategy called AI-augmented physics-based docking. In this study, we also compare docking performance with AlphaFold and Boltz-1, the new state-of-the-art. We distinguish between two types of success tailored to specific downstream applications: (i) criteria sufficient for epitope mapping, where gross quality is adequate and can complement experimental techniques, and (ii) criteria for producing higher-quality models suitable for engineering purposes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We highlight that the quality of the ensemble is crucial for docking performance, that including too many models can be detrimental, and that prioritization of models is essential for achieving good performance. In a scenario analogous to docking using a crystallized antigen, our results robustly demonstrate the advantages of AI-augmented docking over AlphaFold2, further accentuated when higher standards in quality are imposed. Docking also shows improvements over Boltz-1, but those are less pronounced. Docking performance is still noticeably lower than AlphaFold3 in both epitope mapping and antibody design use cases. We observe a strong dependence on CDR-H3 loop length for physics-based tools on their ability to successfully predict. This helps define an applicability range where physics-based docking can be competitive to the newer generation of AI tools.</p><p><strong>Availability and implementation: </strong>The AF2 rescoring scripts are available at github.com/gaudreaultfnrc/AF2-Rescoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":93899,"journal":{"name":"Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11978387/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motivation: Predicting the structure of antibody-antigen complexes is a challenging task with significant implications for the design of better antibody therapeutics. However, the levels of success have remained dauntingly low, particularly when high standards for model quality are required, a necessity for efficient antibody design. Artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly impacted the landscape of structure prediction for antibodies, both alone and in complex with their antigens.

Methods: We utilized AI-guided antibody modeling tools to generate ensembles displaying diversity in the complementarity-determining region (CDR) and integrated those into our previously published AlphaFold2-rescored docking pipeline, a strategy called AI-augmented physics-based docking. In this study, we also compare docking performance with AlphaFold and Boltz-1, the new state-of-the-art. We distinguish between two types of success tailored to specific downstream applications: (i) criteria sufficient for epitope mapping, where gross quality is adequate and can complement experimental techniques, and (ii) criteria for producing higher-quality models suitable for engineering purposes.

Results: We highlight that the quality of the ensemble is crucial for docking performance, that including too many models can be detrimental, and that prioritization of models is essential for achieving good performance. In a scenario analogous to docking using a crystallized antigen, our results robustly demonstrate the advantages of AI-augmented docking over AlphaFold2, further accentuated when higher standards in quality are imposed. Docking also shows improvements over Boltz-1, but those are less pronounced. Docking performance is still noticeably lower than AlphaFold3 in both epitope mapping and antibody design use cases. We observe a strong dependence on CDR-H3 loop length for physics-based tools on their ability to successfully predict. This helps define an applicability range where physics-based docking can be competitive to the newer generation of AI tools.

Availability and implementation: The AF2 rescoring scripts are available at github.com/gaudreaultfnrc/AF2-Rescoring.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于ai增强物理的对接抗体-抗原复合物预测。
动机:预测抗体-抗原复合物的结构是一项具有挑战性的任务,对设计更好的抗体疗法具有重要意义。然而,成功的水平仍然低得令人生畏,特别是当需要高标准的模型质量时,这是有效抗体设计的必要条件。人工智能(AI)已经显著地影响了抗体的结构预测,无论是单独的还是与抗原结合的。方法:我们利用人工智能引导的抗体建模工具生成在互补决定区(CDR)中显示多样性的集成,并将其整合到我们之前发表的alphafold2重建的对接管道中,这是一种称为基于人工智能增强物理的对接策略。在本研究中,我们还比较了AlphaFold和最新技术Boltz-1的对接性能。我们区分了针对特定下游应用定制的两种类型的成功:1)足以进行表位定位的标准,其中总质量足够并且可以补充实验技术;2)生产适合工程目的的高质量模型的标准。结果:我们强调集成的质量对对接性能至关重要,包括太多的模型可能是有害的,并且模型的优先级对于实现良好的性能至关重要。在一个类似于使用结晶抗原对接的场景中,我们的研究结果有力地证明了人工智能增强对接相对于AlphaFold2的优势,当施加更高的质量标准时,这种优势会进一步增强。对接也显示出比Boltz-1的改进,但这些改进不那么明显。在表位定位和抗体设计用例中,对接性能仍明显低于AlphaFold3。我们观察到基于物理的工具对CDR-H3循环长度的强烈依赖取决于它们成功预测的能力。这有助于定义一个适用范围,即基于物理的对接可以与新一代人工智能工具竞争。可用性:AF2评分脚本可在github.com/gaudreaultfnrc/AF2-Rescoring.Supplementary上获得信息;补充数据可在Bioinformatics在线获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
AutoGERN: Single-Cell RNA-Seq Gene Regulatory Network Inference via Explicit Link Modeling and Adaptive Architectures. Enzyme Association for Environmental Biotransformation Reactions Through Contrastive Learning of Reaction Center-Specific Fingerprints. Pretraining Improves Prediction of Genomic Datasets Across Species. FFC: A Scalable FASTA Compressor. Diagnosing scientific replicability through probabilistic distinguishability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1