Body Integrity Dysphoria (BID): Survey of Experts and Development of a Diagnostic Guideline.

IF 4.4 Q1 Medicine Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI:10.3390/medsci13010026
Erich Kasten
{"title":"Body Integrity Dysphoria (BID): Survey of Experts and Development of a Diagnostic Guideline.","authors":"Erich Kasten","doi":"10.3390/medsci13010026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People who suffer from body integrity dysphoria (BID) feel a strong need to be disabled. The most common desire is for amputation or paralysis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to gather the opinion of experts on which types of disabilities are included in BID, which therapies are useful and whether those affected should be supported in obtaining a disability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire with 62 items and a flow chart were developed and sent to experts who have published work with regard to BID.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>22 experts from 11 countries, mostly with an academic title and with an average age of 48.5 years, responded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As expected, amputations and paralysis were clearly attributed to BID, other disabilities (toothlessness, incontinence, diabetes) received rather uncertain or negative scores. On average, those affected were not classified as mentally or psychiatrically ill. Neurological misconnection was considered the most likely cause. Experts did not think it was helpful to inform the health system or even the police about the desire to be disabled. Almost all experts supported the surgical solution of amputation by doctors. All participants believed that BID patients are aware of the limitations imposed by the desired disability. Finally, a flow chart is presented for diagnosis and therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The experts assume that the surgical solution is currently acceptable if it has been proven that the BID-affected person does not suffer from another mental disorder, there is a high level of suffering due to BID, other therapies have not been of any use and it is clear that the quality of life will actually increase as a result of achieving the disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":74152,"journal":{"name":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11944090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13010026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People who suffer from body integrity dysphoria (BID) feel a strong need to be disabled. The most common desire is for amputation or paralysis.

Objectives: This study aims to gather the opinion of experts on which types of disabilities are included in BID, which therapies are useful and whether those affected should be supported in obtaining a disability.

Methods: A questionnaire with 62 items and a flow chart were developed and sent to experts who have published work with regard to BID.

Participants: 22 experts from 11 countries, mostly with an academic title and with an average age of 48.5 years, responded.

Results: As expected, amputations and paralysis were clearly attributed to BID, other disabilities (toothlessness, incontinence, diabetes) received rather uncertain or negative scores. On average, those affected were not classified as mentally or psychiatrically ill. Neurological misconnection was considered the most likely cause. Experts did not think it was helpful to inform the health system or even the police about the desire to be disabled. Almost all experts supported the surgical solution of amputation by doctors. All participants believed that BID patients are aware of the limitations imposed by the desired disability. Finally, a flow chart is presented for diagnosis and therapy.

Conclusions: The experts assume that the surgical solution is currently acceptable if it has been proven that the BID-affected person does not suffer from another mental disorder, there is a high level of suffering due to BID, other therapies have not been of any use and it is clear that the quality of life will actually increase as a result of achieving the disability.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
身体完整性焦虑(BID):专家调查和诊断指南的制定。
患有身体完整性焦虑症(BID)的人有强烈的残疾需求。最常见的愿望是截肢或瘫痪。目的:本研究旨在收集专家对哪些类型的残疾包括在BID中,哪些治疗方法是有用的,以及是否应该支持那些受影响的人获得残疾的意见。方法:编制一份共62项的调查问卷和流程图,并发给已发表相关研究成果的专家。参与者:来自11个国家的22位专家,大多具有学术职称,平均年龄为48.5岁。结果:正如预期的那样,截肢和瘫痪明显归因于BID,其他残疾(无牙、大小便失禁、糖尿病)的评分相当不确定或为负。平均而言,受影响的人没有被归类为精神或精神疾病。神经系统的错误连接被认为是最可能的原因。专家们认为,告知卫生系统甚至警察有关残疾的愿望是没有帮助的。几乎所有的专家都支持医生通过手术解决截肢问题。所有参与者都认为,BID患者意识到期望的残疾所带来的限制。最后,给出了诊断和治疗的流程图。结论:专家们认为,如果已经证明受BID影响的人没有患有其他精神障碍,由于BID而遭受的痛苦程度很高,其他治疗没有任何用处,并且很明显,实现残疾的生活质量实际上会提高,那么手术解决方案目前是可以接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
From Observation to Surgery: A Review of Literature and an Updated Algorithm for Acquired Retinoschisis and Schisis-Detachment. Histopathological Changes Following Bromelain-Based Enzymatic Debridement (NexoBrid®): A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Preclinical and Clinical Evidence. Add-Ons of Heart Disease from the Cardiosurgical Perspective: Gender, Blood Groups and Renal Function. Explainable Artificial Intelligence Unravels the Possible Distinct Roles of VKORC1 and CYP2C9 in Predicting Warfarin Anticoagulation Control. Analysis of Potential Iron Toxicity in Hemodialysis Patients Under Intravenous Iron Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1