Correction to “Remarkable Insensitivity of Protein Diffusion to Protein Charge”

IF 4.6 2区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters Pub Date : 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c00663
Setare Mostajabi Sarhangi, Dmitry V. Matyushov
{"title":"Correction to “Remarkable Insensitivity of Protein Diffusion to Protein Charge”","authors":"Setare Mostajabi Sarhangi, Dmitry V. Matyushov","doi":"10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c00663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Calculations of diffusion constants from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations require finite-size corrections. (1) The diffusion constant <i>D</i><sub>MD</sub> calculated with periodic boundary conditions (PBC) employed in MD needs correction for hydrodynamic effects of viscous solvent flow within the lattice of periodically replicated images of the tagged diffusive particle. For a cubic simulation box of length <i>L</i>, one obtains the diffusion constant of the infinite system <i>D</i> from the PBC value <i>D</i><sub>MD</sub> according to the following equation. (1) We have recently reported MD simulations of the diffusion constants of two proteins, green fluorescent protein (GFP) and plastocyanin (PC), in TIP3P water. (3) The finite-size term in eq 1 was incorrectly calculated, and the corrected <i>D</i> values in Table 2 of ref (3) were close to the MD values <i>D</i><sub>MD</sub>. When we re-examined the reported values, we noticed that <i>D</i> ≃ 257 μm<sup>2</sup>/s from eq 1 significantly exceeds <i>D</i><sub>MD</sub> ≃ 20.8 μm<sup>2</sup>/s for the system size of <i>L</i> ≃ 86 Å (≃18,000 TIP3P water molecules). The finite-size correction, ≃236 μm<sup>2</sup>/s, is thus significantly higher than the MD result itself (η = 0.306 cP for TIP3P water (4) was applied in eq 1). Given approximations involved in deriving the correction term, (1) this observation puts under doubt the validity of <i>D</i> calculated according to eq 1. Here, we present additional data from MD simulations of GFP and PC diffusion in simulation boxes of different size to show that eq 1 highly overestimates <i>D</i>(<i>L</i>) (Figure 1 and Table 1). The MD simulation protocol follows ref (3), with modifications to the box size and the number of water molecules. From charge mutants studied in ref (3), only the wild-type GFP with a charge of −6 is considered here. PC is in its reduced state with the charge of −9. We find strongly divergent values of <i>D</i>(<i>L</i>) and <i>D</i><sub>MD</sub>(<i>L</i>) (Figure 1), while extrapolation to <i>L</i><sup>–1</sup> → 0 gives consistent results for <i>D</i>(∞) and <i>D</i><sub>MD</sub>(∞) (black dots in Figure 1). Figure 1. <i>D</i><sub>MD</sub>(<i>L</i>) (blue) and size-corrected <i>D</i>(<i>L</i>) (red, eq 1) vs <i>L</i><sup>–1</sup> for GFP and PC proteins. The solid lines are linear fits of the MD results (points). The black dots indicate crossing of two interpolations to the infinite-size limit <i>L</i><sup>–1</sup> → 0. Equilibrium trajectories for 50 ns, with dynamics calculated from 10 ns trajectories with the integration time of 1 fs and saving time of 5 fs. Same simulation parameters for PC, except for 100 ns equilibration trajectories. Variations between <i>D</i><sub><i>F</i></sub>(<i>L</i>) data points are caused by corresponding variations in the force variance since τ<sub><i>m</i></sub> is independent of <i>L</i>. <i>D</i><sub><i>F</i></sub> refers to eq 2. We have also calculated diffusion constants from the dynamics of the force <b>F</b> acting on the protein from water. (5−7) <i>D</i> is calculated from the corrected (3,7) Kirkwood equation in which the memory function relaxation time τ<sub><i>m</i></sub> replaces the force relaxation time in the original formulation (5) This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (CHE-2154465). This work used CPU resources through allocation MCB080071 from the Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Coordination Ecosystem: Services &amp; Support (ACCESS) program and through ASU’s Research Computing. This article references 10 other publications. This article has not yet been cited by other publications.","PeriodicalId":62,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c00663","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Calculations of diffusion constants from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations require finite-size corrections. (1) The diffusion constant DMD calculated with periodic boundary conditions (PBC) employed in MD needs correction for hydrodynamic effects of viscous solvent flow within the lattice of periodically replicated images of the tagged diffusive particle. For a cubic simulation box of length L, one obtains the diffusion constant of the infinite system D from the PBC value DMD according to the following equation. (1) We have recently reported MD simulations of the diffusion constants of two proteins, green fluorescent protein (GFP) and plastocyanin (PC), in TIP3P water. (3) The finite-size term in eq 1 was incorrectly calculated, and the corrected D values in Table 2 of ref (3) were close to the MD values DMD. When we re-examined the reported values, we noticed that D ≃ 257 μm2/s from eq 1 significantly exceeds DMD ≃ 20.8 μm2/s for the system size of L ≃ 86 Å (≃18,000 TIP3P water molecules). The finite-size correction, ≃236 μm2/s, is thus significantly higher than the MD result itself (η = 0.306 cP for TIP3P water (4) was applied in eq 1). Given approximations involved in deriving the correction term, (1) this observation puts under doubt the validity of D calculated according to eq 1. Here, we present additional data from MD simulations of GFP and PC diffusion in simulation boxes of different size to show that eq 1 highly overestimates D(L) (Figure 1 and Table 1). The MD simulation protocol follows ref (3), with modifications to the box size and the number of water molecules. From charge mutants studied in ref (3), only the wild-type GFP with a charge of −6 is considered here. PC is in its reduced state with the charge of −9. We find strongly divergent values of D(L) and DMD(L) (Figure 1), while extrapolation to L–1 → 0 gives consistent results for D(∞) and DMD(∞) (black dots in Figure 1). Figure 1. DMD(L) (blue) and size-corrected D(L) (red, eq 1) vs L–1 for GFP and PC proteins. The solid lines are linear fits of the MD results (points). The black dots indicate crossing of two interpolations to the infinite-size limit L–1 → 0. Equilibrium trajectories for 50 ns, with dynamics calculated from 10 ns trajectories with the integration time of 1 fs and saving time of 5 fs. Same simulation parameters for PC, except for 100 ns equilibration trajectories. Variations between DF(L) data points are caused by corresponding variations in the force variance since τm is independent of L. DF refers to eq 2. We have also calculated diffusion constants from the dynamics of the force F acting on the protein from water. (5−7) D is calculated from the corrected (3,7) Kirkwood equation in which the memory function relaxation time τm replaces the force relaxation time in the original formulation (5) This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (CHE-2154465). This work used CPU resources through allocation MCB080071 from the Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Coordination Ecosystem: Services & Support (ACCESS) program and through ASU’s Research Computing. This article references 10 other publications. This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
修正“蛋白质扩散对蛋白质电荷的显著不敏感”
分子动力学(MD)模拟中扩散常数的计算需要有限大小的修正。(1)扩散常数DMD采用周期边界条件(PBC)计算,在标记扩散粒子的周期性复制图像晶格内,需要校正粘性溶剂流动的流体动力学效应。对于长度为L的三次模拟盒,由PBC值DMD得到无限系统D的扩散常数,由下式可得。(1)我们最近报道了两种蛋白质,绿色荧光蛋白(GFP)和质体青素(PC)在TIP3P水中的扩散常数的MD模拟。(3) eq 1中的有限大小项计算错误,ref(3)表2中修正后的D值与MD值DMD接近。当我们重新检查报告的值时,我们注意到从eq 1得到的D≃257 μm2/s明显超过了系统大小为L≃86 Å(≃18000个TIP3P水分子)的DMD≃20.8 μm2/s。因此,有限大小的修正量为236 μm2/s,明显高于MD结果本身(公式1中应用了TIP3P水(4)的η = 0.306 cP)。考虑到推导修正项所涉及的近似,(1)这一观察结果使根据公式1计算的D的有效性受到质疑。在这里,我们提供了来自不同大小的模拟箱中GFP和PC扩散的MD模拟的额外数据,以表明eq 1高度高估了D(L)(图1和表1)。MD模拟方案遵循参考文献(3),修改了盒子大小和水分子数量。在ref(3)研究的带电荷突变体中,这里只考虑带- 6电荷的野生型GFP。PC处于还原态,电荷为- 9。我们发现D(L)和DMD(L)的值有很强的发散性(图1),而外推到L - 1→0,D(∞)和DMD(∞)的结果是一致的(图1中的黑点)。GFP和PC蛋白的DMD(L)(蓝色)和尺寸校正后的D(L)(红色,eq 1) vs L - 1。实线是MD结果(点)的线性拟合。黑点表示两个插值的交叉到无限大小的极限L-1→0。50 ns的平衡轨迹,从10 ns轨迹计算动力学,积分时间为1 fs,节省时间为5 fs。除了100 ns平衡轨迹外,PC的模拟参数相同。DF(L)数据点之间的变化是由力方差的相应变化引起的,因为τm与L无关。DF参考eq 2。我们还从作用于蛋白质的力F的动力学中计算了扩散常数。(5−7)D由修正后的(3,7)Kirkwood方程计算得到,其中记忆函数松弛时间τm取代了原公式中的力松弛时间(5)。这项工作通过从高级网络基础设施协调生态系统:服务中分配MCB080071来使用CPU资源。支持(ACCESS)计划,并通过亚利桑那州立大学的研究计算。本文引用了其他10个出版物。这篇文章尚未被其他出版物引用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL-NANOSCIENCE & NANOTECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
7.00%
发文量
1519
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physical Chemistry (JPC) Letters is devoted to reporting new and original experimental and theoretical basic research of interest to physical chemists, biophysical chemists, chemical physicists, physicists, material scientists, and engineers. An important criterion for acceptance is that the paper reports a significant scientific advance and/or physical insight such that rapid publication is essential. Two issues of JPC Letters are published each month.
期刊最新文献
Issue Publication Information Issue Editorial Masthead Directly Measuring the Connectivity between Isoenergetic Light-Harvesting Antennas in Plant Photosystem II at Physiological Temperature. Co-passivation of Buried Interfaces in Perovskite Solar Cells with Sulfonate and Amine Salts. Beyond Electrostatic Screening: Effect of Ion Pairing on Acid-Base Equilibria in Complex Electrolyte Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1