Does quality matter? Examining the influence of product quality and source on Japanese beef imports

IF 6.2 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Agriculture and Food Research Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jafr.2025.101857
Christina G. Slater , Andrew Muhammad , Karen L. DeLong
{"title":"Does quality matter? Examining the influence of product quality and source on Japanese beef imports","authors":"Christina G. Slater ,&nbsp;Andrew Muhammad ,&nbsp;Karen L. DeLong","doi":"10.1016/j.jafr.2025.101857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Product quality is essential, as it influences consumer preferences and, hence, affects imports. In this study, we employed a demand system framework to estimate source-differentiated beef demand in Japan. Additionally, we evaluated whether the quality attributes of chilled versus frozen beef were significant in explaining trade flows. Using quarterly trade data, we estimated Japanese beef demand by exporting source (e.g., Australia, U.S.) and product quality (chilled and frozen). We used different models based on assumptions about quality (unrestricted, quality aggregated, and quality separability) and compared the demand estimates and resulting elasticities across models. The importance of quality was also verified by separability and aggregation likelihood-ratio tests.</div><div>Results indicate that quality matters. In fact, likelihood-ratio tests indicate that preferences for chilled and frozen beef may even be independent. That is, the demand for chilled beef imports could be estimated separately from frozen beef imports. However, resulting elasticity estimates did not significantly differ when quality attributes were considered, except for U.S. chilled beef where the own-price elasticity was statistically different between the unrestricted model (−0.4) and quality-aggregated model (−1.2). However, we found no significant difference between the elasticities from the quality-separability and quality-aggregated models regardless of source. Results provide insights into Japanese beef import demand, which is important considering Japan is the third largest beef importer in the world.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34393,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agriculture and Food Research","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 101857"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agriculture and Food Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666154325002285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Product quality is essential, as it influences consumer preferences and, hence, affects imports. In this study, we employed a demand system framework to estimate source-differentiated beef demand in Japan. Additionally, we evaluated whether the quality attributes of chilled versus frozen beef were significant in explaining trade flows. Using quarterly trade data, we estimated Japanese beef demand by exporting source (e.g., Australia, U.S.) and product quality (chilled and frozen). We used different models based on assumptions about quality (unrestricted, quality aggregated, and quality separability) and compared the demand estimates and resulting elasticities across models. The importance of quality was also verified by separability and aggregation likelihood-ratio tests.
Results indicate that quality matters. In fact, likelihood-ratio tests indicate that preferences for chilled and frozen beef may even be independent. That is, the demand for chilled beef imports could be estimated separately from frozen beef imports. However, resulting elasticity estimates did not significantly differ when quality attributes were considered, except for U.S. chilled beef where the own-price elasticity was statistically different between the unrestricted model (−0.4) and quality-aggregated model (−1.2). However, we found no significant difference between the elasticities from the quality-separability and quality-aggregated models regardless of source. Results provide insights into Japanese beef import demand, which is important considering Japan is the third largest beef importer in the world.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
质量重要吗?检查产品质量和来源对日本牛肉进口的影响
产品质量至关重要,因为它影响消费者的偏好,从而影响进口。在本研究中,我们采用需求系统框架来估计日本牛肉的来源差异需求。此外,我们评估了冷藏牛肉与冷冻牛肉的质量属性是否在解释贸易流动方面具有重要意义。利用季度贸易数据,我们根据出口来源(如澳大利亚、美国)和产品质量(冷藏和冷冻)估计了日本牛肉的需求。我们使用了基于质量假设的不同模型(无限制的、质量聚合的和质量可分离的),并比较了需求估计和模型之间产生的弹性。通过可分性和聚集似然比检验验证了质量的重要性。结果表明,质量很重要。事实上,似然比测试表明,对冷藏牛肉和冷冻牛肉的偏好甚至可能是独立的。也就是说,冰鲜牛肉的进口需求可以与冷冻牛肉的进口需求分开估算。然而,当考虑质量属性时,所得到的弹性估计并没有显著差异,除了美国冰鲜牛肉,其自身价格弹性在不受限制模型(- 0.4)和质量聚合模型(- 1.2)之间有统计学差异。然而,无论来源如何,我们发现质量可分离性模型和质量聚合模型的弹性之间没有显着差异。研究结果提供了对日本牛肉进口需求的深入了解,考虑到日本是世界第三大牛肉进口国,这一点很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
193
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Climate-smart rice production using treated municipal wastewater: A two-year microcosm evaluation of surface and subsurface fertigation impacts on greenhouse gas emissions and productivity Rapid and sensitive one-tube detection Bipolaris maydis using RPA-coupled CRISPR/Cas12a assay Integrating entropy-weight grading and random forest for rapid quality evaluation and screening of Xanthoceras sorbifolium germplasm Transfer learning and stacking ensembles for biomass estimation from smartphone imagery in pasture-based dairy systems Dietary hydrolyzed casein promotes enteroendocrine cell differentiation and gut microbiota-host interactions in the porcine intestinal mucosa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1