Benchmarking the performance of Indian electricity distribution companies: The applications of multi-stage robust DEA and SFA models

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Economics Pub Date : 2025-03-23 DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108396
Anup Kumar Yadava, Soumyajit Chakraborty, Sonal Gupta
{"title":"Benchmarking the performance of Indian electricity distribution companies: The applications of multi-stage robust DEA and SFA models","authors":"Anup Kumar Yadava,&nbsp;Soumyajit Chakraborty,&nbsp;Sonal Gupta","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Efficiency measures and benchmarking of Electricity Distribution Companies (DISCOMs) are crucial in price-cap monopoly market regulations. Benchmarking methods provide the necessary information for institutions to provide incentives or penalize based on performance. This study applies multi-stage parametric (SFA) and non-parametric (DEA) methods to benchmark the performance of Indian DISCOMs from 2015-16 to 2022–23. The DEA analysis includes SBM DEA, bootstrap DEA, and the panel Malmquist DEA model, which assesses efficiency changes over time. The parametric analysis involves three generations of time-varying panel data random effect SFA models. These models are first generational Random Effect (RE), second generational True Random Effect (TRE), and an advanced four-component model which decomposes persistent and transient efficiency and uses Monte Carlo Simulation to robust the analysis. The results indicate that transient inefficiency contributes more than persistent inefficiency to overall inefficiency. Results suggest that short-term government policies and regulatory changes will enhance the DISCOMs' performance more effectively than internal managerial changes. The study concludes that a stable regulatory environment, fair tariff structures, market competition, and subsidy policy are crucial for enhancing the efficiency of Indian DISCOMs. These findings have a significant role in developing policies and managerial strategies to enhance the performance of underperforming DISCOMs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"145 ","pages":"Article 108396"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325002208","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Efficiency measures and benchmarking of Electricity Distribution Companies (DISCOMs) are crucial in price-cap monopoly market regulations. Benchmarking methods provide the necessary information for institutions to provide incentives or penalize based on performance. This study applies multi-stage parametric (SFA) and non-parametric (DEA) methods to benchmark the performance of Indian DISCOMs from 2015-16 to 2022–23. The DEA analysis includes SBM DEA, bootstrap DEA, and the panel Malmquist DEA model, which assesses efficiency changes over time. The parametric analysis involves three generations of time-varying panel data random effect SFA models. These models are first generational Random Effect (RE), second generational True Random Effect (TRE), and an advanced four-component model which decomposes persistent and transient efficiency and uses Monte Carlo Simulation to robust the analysis. The results indicate that transient inefficiency contributes more than persistent inefficiency to overall inefficiency. Results suggest that short-term government policies and regulatory changes will enhance the DISCOMs' performance more effectively than internal managerial changes. The study concludes that a stable regulatory environment, fair tariff structures, market competition, and subsidy policy are crucial for enhancing the efficiency of Indian DISCOMs. These findings have a significant role in developing policies and managerial strategies to enhance the performance of underperforming DISCOMs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对标印度配电公司绩效:多阶段稳健DEA和SFA模型的应用
在规制价格上限垄断市场时,配电公司的效率措施和基准是至关重要的。基准方法为机构提供必要的信息,以根据绩效提供激励或惩罚。本研究采用多阶段参数(SFA)和非参数(DEA)方法对2015-16年至2022-23年印度DISCOMs的绩效进行了基准测试。DEA分析包括SBM DEA、bootstrap DEA和面板Malmquist DEA模型,用于评估效率随时间的变化。参数分析涉及三代时变面板数据随机效应SFA模型。这些模型分别是第一代随机效应(RE)、第二代真随机效应(TRE)和一种先进的四组分模型,该模型分解了持续效率和瞬态效率,并使用蒙特卡罗模拟对分析进行了鲁棒化。研究结果表明,短期效率低下对整体效率低下的贡献大于持续效率低下。结果表明,短期的政府政策和监管变化比内部管理变化更能有效地提高DISCOMs的绩效。该研究得出结论,稳定的监管环境、公平的关税结构、市场竞争和补贴政策对提高印度discom的效率至关重要。这些发现对制定政策和管理战略以提高表现不佳的discom的绩效具有重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
期刊最新文献
Unraveling environmental threads: Bitcoin prices, energy consumption, and crypto market volatility Investigating nuclear energy viability in Texas with decision making model GenX Do financial technology and clean bonds reshape risk spillovers in sectoral equity markets? A quantile-based assessment using the US case Fuel subsidy removal and monetary policy adjustments in an oil-producing emerging economy Sticky growth, sticky carbon: Bayesian joint modelling evidence on a growth-carbon lock-in in emerging economies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1