The Effect of Cold Application in Postoperative Pain Management of Arthroscopic Surgeries: A Systematic Review

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pain Management Nursing Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1016/j.pmn.2025.01.037
Gamze Bozkul PhD, RN , Hande Nur Arslan PhD Candidate, RN , Mehmet Avcul PhD Student, RN , Sevilay Şenol Çelik PhD, RN
{"title":"The Effect of Cold Application in Postoperative Pain Management of Arthroscopic Surgeries: A Systematic Review","authors":"Gamze Bozkul PhD, RN ,&nbsp;Hande Nur Arslan PhD Candidate, RN ,&nbsp;Mehmet Avcul PhD Student, RN ,&nbsp;Sevilay Şenol Çelik PhD, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2025.01.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose, problem statement, PICO</h3><div>This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of cold application techniques for postoperative pain management in arthroscopic surgeries. The problem it addresses is the need for more consistency in the effectiveness of these techniques, as reported by various studies.</div><div>Population (P): Adult Patients undergoing arthroscopic surgeries</div><div>Intervention (I): Cold applications (cryotherapy, cold compression therapy, etc.)</div><div>Comparison (C): Routine postoperative care</div><div>Outcome (O): Pain intensity reduction</div></div><div><h3>Synthesis of Evidence</h3><div>Articles were scanned using Turkish and English keywords among the 2,366 obtained. From various databases, 2,352 were excluded due to study year, language, non-randomized controlled trials, studies not conducted in intensive care units, and repetitions. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The review includes seven randomized controlled trials and seven quasi-experimental designs focusing on cold application techniques for managing postoperative pain. The synthesis showed that cold applications, mainly cryotherapy, and cryotherapy with compression, significantly reduced postoperative pain and swelling.</div></div><div><h3>Method of Evaluation</h3><div>Studies were assessed for quality based on relevance to the research question and robustness of findings. The focus was on cold application types, pain and swelling measurement, patient satisfaction, and functional recovery outcomes. The systematic analysis revealed patterns and discrepancies among studies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most studies showed that cold application techniques significantly help reduce postoperative pain and swelling. The expected benefits included enhanced patient satisfaction and improved functional recovery. Kraeutler et al. found compressive cryotherapy superior to standard ice application for patient comfort and pain reduction. The findings suggest cold applications will likely enhance patient outcomes post-arthroscopic surgeries.</div></div><div><h3>Future Implications for the Nursing Profession</h3><div>Nurses should implement and maximize cold application practices during postoperative care. Standardizing such practices can optimize benefits. Future research should explore long-term results for different patient populations and various arthroscopic surgeries. Developing evidence-based practice guidelines for these modalities can significantly enhance nursing practice to improve postoperative patient comfort, satisfaction, and functional recovery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":"26 2","pages":"Pages e221-e222"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904225000517","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose, problem statement, PICO

This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of cold application techniques for postoperative pain management in arthroscopic surgeries. The problem it addresses is the need for more consistency in the effectiveness of these techniques, as reported by various studies.
Population (P): Adult Patients undergoing arthroscopic surgeries
Intervention (I): Cold applications (cryotherapy, cold compression therapy, etc.)
Comparison (C): Routine postoperative care
Outcome (O): Pain intensity reduction

Synthesis of Evidence

Articles were scanned using Turkish and English keywords among the 2,366 obtained. From various databases, 2,352 were excluded due to study year, language, non-randomized controlled trials, studies not conducted in intensive care units, and repetitions. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The review includes seven randomized controlled trials and seven quasi-experimental designs focusing on cold application techniques for managing postoperative pain. The synthesis showed that cold applications, mainly cryotherapy, and cryotherapy with compression, significantly reduced postoperative pain and swelling.

Method of Evaluation

Studies were assessed for quality based on relevance to the research question and robustness of findings. The focus was on cold application types, pain and swelling measurement, patient satisfaction, and functional recovery outcomes. The systematic analysis revealed patterns and discrepancies among studies.

Results

Most studies showed that cold application techniques significantly help reduce postoperative pain and swelling. The expected benefits included enhanced patient satisfaction and improved functional recovery. Kraeutler et al. found compressive cryotherapy superior to standard ice application for patient comfort and pain reduction. The findings suggest cold applications will likely enhance patient outcomes post-arthroscopic surgeries.

Future Implications for the Nursing Profession

Nurses should implement and maximize cold application practices during postoperative care. Standardizing such practices can optimize benefits. Future research should explore long-term results for different patient populations and various arthroscopic surgeries. Developing evidence-based practice guidelines for these modalities can significantly enhance nursing practice to improve postoperative patient comfort, satisfaction, and functional recovery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冷敷在关节镜手术术后疼痛管理中的作用:系统综述
目的,问题陈述,pico本系统综述旨在评价冷敷技术在关节镜手术术后疼痛管理中的有效性。它解决的问题是,正如各种研究报告的那样,这些技术的有效性需要更加一致。人群(P):接受关节镜手术的成年患者干预(I):冷敷(冷冻疗法、冷敷疗法等)比较(C):术后常规护理结果(O):疼痛强度减轻证据合成在获得的2366篇文章中使用土耳其语和英语关键词进行扫描。从各种数据库中,由于研究年份、语言、非随机对照试验、未在重症监护病房进行的研究和重复,2,352例被排除。14项研究符合纳入标准。本综述包括7个随机对照试验和7个准实验设计,重点关注冷敷技术对术后疼痛的控制。综合研究表明,冷敷(主要是冷冻疗法)和冷冻压迫疗法可显著减轻术后疼痛和肿胀。评价方法评价研究的质量基于与研究问题的相关性和研究结果的稳健性。重点是冷敷类型、疼痛和肿胀测量、患者满意度和功能恢复结果。系统分析揭示了研究之间的模式和差异。结果大多数研究表明,冷敷技术可显著减轻术后疼痛和肿胀。预期的好处包括提高患者满意度和改善功能恢复。Kraeutler等人发现压缩冷冻疗法在患者舒适和减轻疼痛方面优于标准冰敷。研究结果表明,冷敷可能会提高关节镜手术后患者的预后。未来对护理专业的启示护士应该在术后护理中实施并最大化冷应用实践。将这些做法标准化可以使效益最大化。未来的研究应探索不同患者群体和各种关节镜手术的长期结果。为这些模式制定循证实践指南可以显著提高护理实践,以提高术后患者的舒适度、满意度和功能恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
期刊最新文献
Hospice Nurses' Views About the Necessity for Palliative Sedation in Existential Suffering. Contemporary Pain Neuroscience Knowledge and Attitudes Among Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. Pupillary Reaction to Opioids on Awake Subjects: A Systematic Review. Validation of a Swahili Pediatric Pain Scale in Tanzania: An Observational Study. The Centralized Pain Score: A Method to Identify Nociplastic Pain in Electronic Health Records.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1