Only the IV Dilaudid works for me

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pain Management Nursing Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1016/j.pmn.2025.01.076
Diane Scheb MSN RN, AP-PMN, PMGT-BC, Kaylyn (Katie) Williams MSN, RN, AHN-BC, NEA-BC
{"title":"Only the IV Dilaudid works for me","authors":"Diane Scheb MSN RN, AP-PMN, PMGT-BC,&nbsp;Kaylyn (Katie) Williams MSN, RN, AHN-BC, NEA-BC","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2025.01.076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hospitalized patients have come to rely on the immediate pain relief afforded by intravenous (IV) opioids. Often appropriate upon admission, as needed, prolonged IV opioid orders remain active even after the patient's conditions improves. If prn opioids are ordered and the patient asks for the IV opioid, the RN feels obligated to administer the medication. Recent medical guidelines urged hospitalists to adhere to prescribing strategies that favor the oral route when the patient does not have gastrointestinal dysfunction. Prolonged IV opioid use, when other routes are available, can carry significant risks. These risks include more side effects, medication errors, and potential downstream improper opioid use post hospitalization. In addition, opioids administered intravenously, rapidly reach the reward and euphoria brain centers. This produces reinforcement in patients. Reinforcement is escalated when repeated doses of IV opioids are administered; this may lead to habitual and eventual problematic opioid use post hospitalization. The Acute Pain Service (APS)is an interdisciplinary nursing/pharmacy team at a 901-bed hospital in Sarasota, Florida. Using descriptive statistics, the team examined the medical records of one hundred patients after an electronic alert fired. The alert signaled that the patient had received twelve doses of IV opioid during his hospitalization. We questioned whether APS recommendations would ultimately change prolonged opioid orders. Of the one hundred patients studied, physicians accepted 45% of the APS recommendations. Many physicians were unaware that their patients were continuing to receive IV opioids. Prolonged IV opioid orders were deemed appropriate (55%) in hospice situations, short time IV opioid use situations and in those patients who were discharged shortly after the alert fired. Given the national emphasis on curbing prescription opioid use, this presentation has implications for acute care nurses. Learn how the APS manages the alert using a critical thinking algorithm including approaching both patients and physicians. Concepts discussed will enable nurses to deliver safe analgesic care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":"26 2","pages":"Page e233"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904225000906","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hospitalized patients have come to rely on the immediate pain relief afforded by intravenous (IV) opioids. Often appropriate upon admission, as needed, prolonged IV opioid orders remain active even after the patient's conditions improves. If prn opioids are ordered and the patient asks for the IV opioid, the RN feels obligated to administer the medication. Recent medical guidelines urged hospitalists to adhere to prescribing strategies that favor the oral route when the patient does not have gastrointestinal dysfunction. Prolonged IV opioid use, when other routes are available, can carry significant risks. These risks include more side effects, medication errors, and potential downstream improper opioid use post hospitalization. In addition, opioids administered intravenously, rapidly reach the reward and euphoria brain centers. This produces reinforcement in patients. Reinforcement is escalated when repeated doses of IV opioids are administered; this may lead to habitual and eventual problematic opioid use post hospitalization. The Acute Pain Service (APS)is an interdisciplinary nursing/pharmacy team at a 901-bed hospital in Sarasota, Florida. Using descriptive statistics, the team examined the medical records of one hundred patients after an electronic alert fired. The alert signaled that the patient had received twelve doses of IV opioid during his hospitalization. We questioned whether APS recommendations would ultimately change prolonged opioid orders. Of the one hundred patients studied, physicians accepted 45% of the APS recommendations. Many physicians were unaware that their patients were continuing to receive IV opioids. Prolonged IV opioid orders were deemed appropriate (55%) in hospice situations, short time IV opioid use situations and in those patients who were discharged shortly after the alert fired. Given the national emphasis on curbing prescription opioid use, this presentation has implications for acute care nurses. Learn how the APS manages the alert using a critical thinking algorithm including approaching both patients and physicians. Concepts discussed will enable nurses to deliver safe analgesic care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
只有静脉注射的苯胺对我有效
住院患者已经开始依赖静脉注射(IV)阿片类药物立即缓解疼痛。通常适合入院时,根据需要,延长静脉注射阿片类药物的命令,即使在病人的病情改善后仍然有效。如果订购了prn阿片类药物,而患者要求静脉注射阿片类药物,注册护士觉得有义务给药。最近的医疗指南敦促医院坚持处方策略,有利于口服途径,当病人没有胃肠功能障碍。当有其他途径可用时,长时间静脉注射阿片类药物可能会带来重大风险。这些风险包括更多的副作用、用药错误和住院后潜在的下游不当阿片类药物使用。此外,静脉注射阿片类药物可以迅速到达大脑的奖励和欣快中枢。这在病人体内产生了强化。当静脉注射阿片类药物的剂量重复时,强化会逐步加强;这可能导致住院后习惯性和最终成问题的阿片类药物使用。急性疼痛服务(APS)是佛罗里达州萨拉索塔市一家拥有901张床位的医院的跨学科护理/药房团队。利用描述性统计,研究小组在电子警报响起后检查了100名患者的医疗记录。警报表明患者在住院期间接受了12剂静脉注射阿片类药物。我们质疑APS的建议是否最终会改变长期的阿片类药物订单。在研究的100名患者中,医生接受了45%的APS建议。许多医生没有意识到他们的病人在继续接受静脉注射阿片类药物。在临终关怀情况下,在短时间静脉注射阿片类药物的情况下,以及在警报响起后不久出院的患者中,延长静脉注射阿片类药物的命令被认为是适当的(55%)。鉴于国家强调遏制处方阿片类药物的使用,这一介绍对急症护理护士有影响。了解APS如何使用批判性思维算法管理警报,包括接近患者和医生。讨论的概念将使护士提供安全的镇痛护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
期刊最新文献
Hospice Nurses' Views About the Necessity for Palliative Sedation in Existential Suffering. Contemporary Pain Neuroscience Knowledge and Attitudes Among Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. Pupillary Reaction to Opioids on Awake Subjects: A Systematic Review. Validation of a Swahili Pediatric Pain Scale in Tanzania: An Observational Study. The Centralized Pain Score: A Method to Identify Nociplastic Pain in Electronic Health Records.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1