{"title":"Tailoring Technology for Pain Management: A Qualitative Comparison of Digital Health Platforms","authors":"Lynn Webster MD","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2025.01.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Chronic pain management has seen a surge in digital technologies promising improved outcomes, efficiency, and revenue. However, the diverse functionalities and focus areas of these platforms make choosing the right one a critical healthcare decision. This study compares 10 popular platforms to delineate their unique capabilities.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>The author searched online for “Telehealth OR mHealth OR mHealth OR app AND remote therapeutic monitoring AND chronic care management OR pain OR chronic pain.” Platforms that were not provider-facing and reimbursement-friendly were excluded. Ten platforms (PainScript, Keet Health, Prevounce Health, PatchRx, HealthArc, TimeDoc, Paindrainer, HealthViewX, Limber, and PainScored) were evaluated by primary focus, key features, user interface, integration capabilities, healthcare models supported, and unique offerings. Information was collated from official product websites and relevant literature.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Functional comparisons included targeted populations, daily monitoring categories and types of monitoring for each platform. Technical capabilities were also compared and included use and type of smartphone required, presences of secure messaging, gamification, EHR integration and patient time commitment for meeting the platform expectations. Comparisons will be presented in table format.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This is the first known qualitative study comparing digital platforms for clinical pain management. Reviewed platforms offered varied functionalities tailored to specific needs. PainScript and Paindrainer specifically targeted chronic pain and substance use disorder, facilitating direct patient-provider interaction and real-time monitoring. HealthViewX and Limber offered broader services in telehealth and physical therapy with strong emphases on integration and comprehensive care coordination. Keet Health and TimeDoc sought to enhance patient engagement and outpatient care continuity. Prevounce Health and PainScored prioritized preventive care and chronic disease management to streamline care processes and improve patient compliance. Lastly, PatchRx introduced innovative medication adherence technology, illustrating the potential of digital solutions to address common drug misuse challenges. Choice of a digital health platform should be guided by the specific patient population needs and operational workflow.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":"26 2","pages":"Page e221"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904225000499","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Chronic pain management has seen a surge in digital technologies promising improved outcomes, efficiency, and revenue. However, the diverse functionalities and focus areas of these platforms make choosing the right one a critical healthcare decision. This study compares 10 popular platforms to delineate their unique capabilities.
Materials and Methods
The author searched online for “Telehealth OR mHealth OR mHealth OR app AND remote therapeutic monitoring AND chronic care management OR pain OR chronic pain.” Platforms that were not provider-facing and reimbursement-friendly were excluded. Ten platforms (PainScript, Keet Health, Prevounce Health, PatchRx, HealthArc, TimeDoc, Paindrainer, HealthViewX, Limber, and PainScored) were evaluated by primary focus, key features, user interface, integration capabilities, healthcare models supported, and unique offerings. Information was collated from official product websites and relevant literature.
Results
Functional comparisons included targeted populations, daily monitoring categories and types of monitoring for each platform. Technical capabilities were also compared and included use and type of smartphone required, presences of secure messaging, gamification, EHR integration and patient time commitment for meeting the platform expectations. Comparisons will be presented in table format.
Conclusions
This is the first known qualitative study comparing digital platforms for clinical pain management. Reviewed platforms offered varied functionalities tailored to specific needs. PainScript and Paindrainer specifically targeted chronic pain and substance use disorder, facilitating direct patient-provider interaction and real-time monitoring. HealthViewX and Limber offered broader services in telehealth and physical therapy with strong emphases on integration and comprehensive care coordination. Keet Health and TimeDoc sought to enhance patient engagement and outpatient care continuity. Prevounce Health and PainScored prioritized preventive care and chronic disease management to streamline care processes and improve patient compliance. Lastly, PatchRx introduced innovative medication adherence technology, illustrating the potential of digital solutions to address common drug misuse challenges. Choice of a digital health platform should be guided by the specific patient population needs and operational workflow.
慢性疼痛管理已经看到了数字技术的激增,有望改善结果、效率和收入。然而,这些平台的不同功能和重点领域使得选择正确的平台成为关键的医疗保健决策。本研究比较了10个流行的平台,以描述它们的独特功能。材料和方法作者在网上搜索“远程医疗或移动医疗或移动医疗或应用程序和远程治疗监测和慢性护理管理或疼痛或慢性疼痛”。不面向供应商和不便于报销的平台被排除在外。10个平台(PainScript、keep Health、Prevounce Health、PatchRx、HealthArc、TimeDoc、paindrain、HealthViewX、Limber和painscores)根据主要焦点、关键功能、用户界面、集成能力、支持的医疗模型和独特产品进行了评估。从官方产品网站和相关文献中整理信息。结果功能比较包括目标人群、每日监测类别和各平台监测类型。还比较了技术能力,包括所需智能手机的使用和类型、安全消息的存在、游戏化、EHR集成和满足平台期望的患者时间承诺。比较将以表格形式提出。这是已知的第一个比较临床疼痛管理数字平台的定性研究。经过审查的平台提供了针对特定需求量身定制的各种功能。PainScript和paindrain专门针对慢性疼痛和物质使用障碍,促进直接的患者-提供者互动和实时监测。HealthViewX和Limber在远程保健和物理治疗方面提供更广泛的服务,重点是综合和综合护理协调。keep Health and TimeDoc旨在提高患者参与度和门诊护理的连续性。预防健康和疼痛评分优先考虑预防保健和慢性疾病管理,以简化护理流程并提高患者依从性。最后,PatchRx介绍了创新的药物依从性技术,说明了数字解决方案在解决常见药物滥用挑战方面的潜力。数字医疗平台的选择应以具体的患者群体需求和操作工作流程为指导。
期刊介绍:
This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.