Associations between estimated glucose disposal rate and osteoarthritis risk in US adults: a cross-sectional study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Pub Date : 2025-03-26 DOI:10.1186/s12891-025-08568-1
Zhiqiang Que, Dingqiang Chen, Huirong Cai, Weibin Lan, Yuxuan Huang, Gang Rui
{"title":"Associations between estimated glucose disposal rate and osteoarthritis risk in US adults: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Zhiqiang Que, Dingqiang Chen, Huirong Cai, Weibin Lan, Yuxuan Huang, Gang Rui","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-08568-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) is a novel insulin resistance (IR) assessment surrogate. Although it has shown promising potential in other metabolic disease studies, no research has yet explored its relationship with osteoarthritis (OA). Therefore, this study aims to investigate the association between eGDR and OA in a cross-sectional observational cohort.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data utilized in this cross-sectional study were drawn from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between eGDR and OA, stratified analysis was applied to assess the stability of the results.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 19,040 participants were included in the study, including 2,001 OA patients and 17,039 non-OA participants with an age distribution ranging from 20 to 85 years. The fully adjusted logistic regression model shows that eGDR were less likely associated with OA compared to those with non-OA (OR = 0.879, 95% CI = 0.846-0.914, P < 0.001). By dispersing the eGDR into quartiles, the correlation between eGDR and OA remained significant (P for trend < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that eGDR is independently associated with OA, with lower eGDR values being linked to a higher risk of OA.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"302"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11938617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08568-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) is a novel insulin resistance (IR) assessment surrogate. Although it has shown promising potential in other metabolic disease studies, no research has yet explored its relationship with osteoarthritis (OA). Therefore, this study aims to investigate the association between eGDR and OA in a cross-sectional observational cohort.

Method: Data utilized in this cross-sectional study were drawn from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between eGDR and OA, stratified analysis was applied to assess the stability of the results.

Result: A total of 19,040 participants were included in the study, including 2,001 OA patients and 17,039 non-OA participants with an age distribution ranging from 20 to 85 years. The fully adjusted logistic regression model shows that eGDR were less likely associated with OA compared to those with non-OA (OR = 0.879, 95% CI = 0.846-0.914, P < 0.001). By dispersing the eGDR into quartiles, the correlation between eGDR and OA remained significant (P for trend < 0.0001).

Conclusion: This study suggests that eGDR is independently associated with OA, with lower eGDR values being linked to a higher risk of OA.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国成人估计葡萄糖处理率与骨关节炎风险之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
背景:估计葡萄糖处置率(eGDR)是一种新的胰岛素抵抗(IR)评估指标。虽然它在其他代谢性疾病研究中显示出良好的潜力,但尚未有研究探索其与骨关节炎(OA)的关系。因此,本研究旨在通过横断面观察队列研究eGDR与OA之间的关系。方法:本横断面研究使用的数据来自国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)。采用Logistic回归模型评价eGDR与OA的相关性,采用分层分析评价结果的稳定性。结果:研究共纳入19040名参与者,其中包括2001名OA患者和17039名非OA参与者,年龄分布从20岁到85岁不等。完全调整后的logistic回归模型显示,与非OA患者相比,eGDR与OA相关的可能性较小(OR = 0.879, 95% CI = 0.846-0.914, P)。结论:本研究提示eGDR与OA独立相关,eGDR值越低,OA风险越高。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
期刊最新文献
Predicting postoperative pulmonary function improvement in pediatric scoliosis using 3-dimensional computed tomography analysis. The relationship between thoracic kyphosis and Q angle with balance and falls in patients with osteoporosis. Reconsidering uniform treatment: magnetic resonance imaging-based insights into the multiform pathophysiology of sprained ankles. Development of a discrete choice experiment design to explore how patient characteristics influence preferred fixation method in total hip replacement in the UK. Kinesiophobia, proprioception, and functional status after total knee arthroplasty: the mediating role of deep flexion joint position error.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1