The XBB.1.5 mRNA booster vaccine does not significantly increase the percentage of XBB.1.5 mono-reactive T cells.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Frontiers in Immunology Pub Date : 2025-03-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1513175
Joel Sop, Alicia Mercado, Alexis Figueroa, Tyler P Beckey, Caroline C Traut, Li Zhang, Kellie N Smith, Joel N Blankson
{"title":"The XBB.1.5 mRNA booster vaccine does not significantly increase the percentage of XBB.1.5 mono-reactive T cells.","authors":"Joel Sop, Alicia Mercado, Alexis Figueroa, Tyler P Beckey, Caroline C Traut, Li Zhang, Kellie N Smith, Joel N Blankson","doi":"10.3389/fimmu.2025.1513175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent efforts in vaccine development have targeted spike proteins from evolving SARS-CoV-2 variants. In this study, we analyzed T cell responses to the XBB.1.5 and BA.2.86 subvariants in individuals who previously received bivalent vaccines containing mRNA for ancestral and BA.5 spike proteins. T cell-mediated cytokine responses to spike proteins from both variants were largely preserved. To determine the mechanism of this preserved recognition, we utilized the functional expansion of specific T cells (FEST) assay to distinguish between the presence of T cells that cross-recognized ancestral and variant epitopes versus distinct populations of T cells that were mono-reactive for ancestral or variant epitopes. We found the majority of spike-specific T cells cross-recognized the ancestral spike and the XBB.1.5 and BA.2.86 subvariants, with less than 10% of T cells being mono-reactive for either variant. Interestingly, immunization with the XBB.1.5 monovalent booster vaccine did not significantly increase the percentage of XBB.1.5 mono-reactive T cells. Our results suggest a potential limitation in the induction of mono-reactive T cell responses by variant-specific booster vaccines.</p>","PeriodicalId":12622,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Immunology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1513175"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11936820/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1513175","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent efforts in vaccine development have targeted spike proteins from evolving SARS-CoV-2 variants. In this study, we analyzed T cell responses to the XBB.1.5 and BA.2.86 subvariants in individuals who previously received bivalent vaccines containing mRNA for ancestral and BA.5 spike proteins. T cell-mediated cytokine responses to spike proteins from both variants were largely preserved. To determine the mechanism of this preserved recognition, we utilized the functional expansion of specific T cells (FEST) assay to distinguish between the presence of T cells that cross-recognized ancestral and variant epitopes versus distinct populations of T cells that were mono-reactive for ancestral or variant epitopes. We found the majority of spike-specific T cells cross-recognized the ancestral spike and the XBB.1.5 and BA.2.86 subvariants, with less than 10% of T cells being mono-reactive for either variant. Interestingly, immunization with the XBB.1.5 monovalent booster vaccine did not significantly increase the percentage of XBB.1.5 mono-reactive T cells. Our results suggest a potential limitation in the induction of mono-reactive T cell responses by variant-specific booster vaccines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
XBB.1.5 mRNA增强疫苗没有显著增加XBB.1.5单反应性T细胞的百分比。
最近在疫苗开发方面的努力瞄准了进化中的SARS-CoV-2变体的刺突蛋白。在这项研究中,我们分析了以前接种过含有祖先和BA.5刺突蛋白mRNA的二价疫苗的个体对XBB.1.5和BA.2.86亚变异体的T细胞反应。T细胞介导的细胞因子对这两种变异的刺突蛋白的反应在很大程度上被保留了下来。为了确定这种保留识别的机制,我们利用特异性T细胞功能扩增(FEST)试验来区分交叉识别祖先和变异表位的T细胞与对祖先或变异表位单反应的不同T细胞群体。我们发现大多数刺突特异性T细胞交叉识别祖先刺突和XBB.1.5和BA.2.86亚变体,只有不到10%的T细胞对任何一种变体都是单反应的。有趣的是,接种XBB.1.5单价加强疫苗并没有显著增加XBB.1.5单反应性T细胞的百分比。我们的结果表明,变异特异性加强疫苗在诱导单反应性T细胞应答方面存在潜在的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
11.00%
发文量
7153
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Immunology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across basic, translational and clinical immunology. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Immunology is the official Journal of the International Union of Immunological Societies (IUIS). Encompassing the entire field of Immunology, this journal welcomes papers that investigate basic mechanisms of immune system development and function, with a particular emphasis given to the description of the clinical and immunological phenotype of human immune disorders, and on the definition of their molecular basis.
期刊最新文献
Multi-omics and experimental validation identify USP54 as a prognostic deubiquitinase promoting pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression within the immune microenvironment. Natural killer cell dysfunction in glioma: from immune evasion to immunotherapy. Next-generation immunotherapy biologics for glioblastoma. Neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease with initial manifestation of intractable nausea and vomiting responsive to corticosteroids: a case report. Neuronal autoantibodies associated with poorer neuropsychological and motor outcomes 6 months after stroke: results from the PHYS-STROKE trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1