Examining the Construct Validity of Experimental Suicide Images Among Young Adults.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1111/sltb.70010
Lily W Martin, Gabrielle Craddock, Owen Hicks, Ibukunoluwa Grace Okusanya, Jeremy G Stewart
{"title":"Examining the Construct Validity of Experimental Suicide Images Among Young Adults.","authors":"Lily W Martin, Gabrielle Craddock, Owen Hicks, Ibukunoluwa Grace Okusanya, Jeremy G Stewart","doi":"10.1111/sltb.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to validate and provide detailed norms on suicide images commonly used in experimental suicide research, and to examine whether appraisals of suicide images varied based on image features and prior suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Young adults (N = 264) rated the extent to which images depicted someone \"trying to kill themselves on purpose or who did kill themselves on purpose\" (i.e., suicide ratings). Suicide ratings were examined descriptively and with bivariate and multivariable statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Suicide images demonstrated construct validity at image and aggregate levels. Further, suicide images looked more like suicide than pleasant, neutral, and interpersonal violence images, bs ≥ 5.653, ts ≥ 52.505, ps < 0.001. Among suicide images, suicide ratings were higher for images without compared to with gore, b = 0.269, t = 7.714, p < 0.001, and for images depicting high lethality methods (e.g., hanging, firearm) compared to the grand mean of all methods, bs ≥ 0.235, ts ≥ 3.316, ps < 0.001. Suicide ratings of suicide images were not associated with prior STBs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using valid suicide images, like those tested in the current study, could improve behavioral methods designed to study processes related to STBs.</p>","PeriodicalId":39684,"journal":{"name":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","volume":"55 2","pages":"e70010"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948950/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.70010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to validate and provide detailed norms on suicide images commonly used in experimental suicide research, and to examine whether appraisals of suicide images varied based on image features and prior suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs).

Method: Young adults (N = 264) rated the extent to which images depicted someone "trying to kill themselves on purpose or who did kill themselves on purpose" (i.e., suicide ratings). Suicide ratings were examined descriptively and with bivariate and multivariable statistics.

Results: Suicide images demonstrated construct validity at image and aggregate levels. Further, suicide images looked more like suicide than pleasant, neutral, and interpersonal violence images, bs ≥ 5.653, ts ≥ 52.505, ps < 0.001. Among suicide images, suicide ratings were higher for images without compared to with gore, b = 0.269, t = 7.714, p < 0.001, and for images depicting high lethality methods (e.g., hanging, firearm) compared to the grand mean of all methods, bs ≥ 0.235, ts ≥ 3.316, ps < 0.001. Suicide ratings of suicide images were not associated with prior STBs.

Conclusion: Using valid suicide images, like those tested in the current study, could improve behavioral methods designed to study processes related to STBs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年实验性自杀影像的建构效度检验。
目的:本研究的目的是验证和提供实验自杀研究中常用的自杀图像的详细规范,并检查对自杀图像的评价是否会因图像特征和自杀念头和行为(STBs)而变化。方法:年轻人(N = 264)对图片中描述某人“故意试图自杀或故意自杀”的程度进行评级(即自杀评级)。自杀率用描述性、双变量和多变量统计进行检验。结果:自杀图像在图像和总体水平上证明了结构效度。此外,自杀图像比愉快、中性和人际暴力图像更像自杀,bs≥5.653,ts≥52.505,ps。结论:使用有效的自杀图像,如本研究所测试的,可以改进设计用于研究性传播感染相关过程的行为方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: An excellent resource for researchers as well as students, Social Cognition features reports on empirical research, self-perception, self-concept, social neuroscience, person-memory integration, social schemata, the development of social cognition, and the role of affect in memory and perception. Three broad concerns define the scope of the journal: - The processes underlying the perception, memory, and judgment of social stimuli - The effects of social, cultural, and affective factors on the processing of information - The behavioral and interpersonal consequences of cognitive processes.
期刊最新文献
Apologies in Crisis: The Link Between Perceived Burdensomeness and Suicide Risk in Online Text Communication. Nightmares and Capability for Suicide: Implications in Adolescents at High-Risk for Suicide. The Longitudinal Reciprocal Relations of Adolescents' Non-Suicidal Self-Injury and Suicidal Ideation and the Mediating Role of Irritability: A Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model Analysis. Near-Term Risk for Psychosis and Non-Psychosis-Related Suicide: A Retrospective Examination of the Last 30 Days of Life. When "Self-Harm" Means "Suicide": A Topic Modeling Study of Adolescent Online Help-Seeking for Self-Harm.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1