"How much more on the nurse?:" a qualitative analysis of inpatient nurses' perspectives on offering HIV testing.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING BMC Nursing Pub Date : 2025-03-26 DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-02845-z
Emily D Grussing, Sally D Dershwitz, Olabimpe Asupoto, Michael Martin, Paula Jo Beniers, Abigail W Batchelder, Alysse G Wurcel
{"title":"\"How much more on the nurse?:\" a qualitative analysis of inpatient nurses' perspectives on offering HIV testing.","authors":"Emily D Grussing, Sally D Dershwitz, Olabimpe Asupoto, Michael Martin, Paula Jo Beniers, Abigail W Batchelder, Alysse G Wurcel","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-02845-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The CDC recommends that all individuals who are hospitalized be offered HIV testing. Low HIV testing rates have been reported among hospitalized patients. We investigated expanding HIV testing among hospitalized patients at our medical center, and hospital leadership consistently recommended exploring nursing-driven, universal HIV testing. The goal of this study was to use qualitative methods to evaluate Tufts Medical Center inpatient nurses' perspectives about the barriers and facilitators of implementing an inpatient nursing-based HIV testing protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study employed a qualitative research design through in-depth interviews and focus groups; these guides were developed based on Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Theoretical Domains Framework. Any inpatient nurse employed at Tufts Medical Center in January 2023 was eligible to participate, including case managers and travel nurses. Nurses were recruited through in-person recruitment, email, or flyers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>42 inpatient nurses participated in ten focus groups and two interviews. Eight primary themes emerged that were categorized into barriers and facilitators/strategies. The barriers were (1) concern that HIV testing would increase the nurse charting burden, (2) belief that HIV testing is not a priority for hospitalized patients, (3) concern that HIV testing consent is outside the scope of nursing practice, (4) misinformation about the required HIV testing consenting process, and (5) concern about offending patients. The facilitators/strategies were (6) belief that HIV testing is necessary for personal health, beneficial to public health and necessary for occupational safety; (7) ability to leverage existing systems of care support to HIV testing; and (8) ability to leverage current systems of education to increase HIV testing. Results showed that fostering trust within treatment teams and between patients and nurses would enable nurses to obtain patient consent for HIV testing without fear of negative consequences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While nurses have concerns about offering HIV testing to all hospitalized patients, there are existing systems that can be leveraged to make implementing of universal, nursing-driven HIV testing acceptable and sustainable; these include protocolization; engagement and trust; and nursing champions of expanding HIV testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"327"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02845-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The CDC recommends that all individuals who are hospitalized be offered HIV testing. Low HIV testing rates have been reported among hospitalized patients. We investigated expanding HIV testing among hospitalized patients at our medical center, and hospital leadership consistently recommended exploring nursing-driven, universal HIV testing. The goal of this study was to use qualitative methods to evaluate Tufts Medical Center inpatient nurses' perspectives about the barriers and facilitators of implementing an inpatient nursing-based HIV testing protocol.

Methods: The study employed a qualitative research design through in-depth interviews and focus groups; these guides were developed based on Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Theoretical Domains Framework. Any inpatient nurse employed at Tufts Medical Center in January 2023 was eligible to participate, including case managers and travel nurses. Nurses were recruited through in-person recruitment, email, or flyers.

Results: 42 inpatient nurses participated in ten focus groups and two interviews. Eight primary themes emerged that were categorized into barriers and facilitators/strategies. The barriers were (1) concern that HIV testing would increase the nurse charting burden, (2) belief that HIV testing is not a priority for hospitalized patients, (3) concern that HIV testing consent is outside the scope of nursing practice, (4) misinformation about the required HIV testing consenting process, and (5) concern about offending patients. The facilitators/strategies were (6) belief that HIV testing is necessary for personal health, beneficial to public health and necessary for occupational safety; (7) ability to leverage existing systems of care support to HIV testing; and (8) ability to leverage current systems of education to increase HIV testing. Results showed that fostering trust within treatment teams and between patients and nurses would enable nurses to obtain patient consent for HIV testing without fear of negative consequences.

Conclusions: While nurses have concerns about offering HIV testing to all hospitalized patients, there are existing systems that can be leveraged to make implementing of universal, nursing-driven HIV testing acceptable and sustainable; these include protocolization; engagement and trust; and nursing champions of expanding HIV testing.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“护士还要付多少钱?”:住院护士对提供HIV检测的看法的定性分析。
背景:美国疾病控制与预防中心建议所有住院的人接受艾滋病毒检测。据报道,住院患者的艾滋病毒检测率较低。我们调查了在我们医疗中心的住院患者中扩大艾滋病毒检测,医院领导一致建议探索护理驱动的普遍艾滋病毒检测。本研究的目的是使用定性方法评估塔夫茨医疗中心住院护士对实施基于住院护理的HIV检测方案的障碍和促进因素的看法。方法:采用深度访谈和焦点小组的定性研究设计;这些指南是在实施研究综合框架和理论领域框架的基础上制定的。2023年1月在塔夫茨医疗中心工作的任何住院护士都有资格参加,包括病例管理人员和旅行护士。护士是通过亲自招聘、电子邮件或传单的方式招募的。结果:42名住院护士参加了10个焦点小组和2次访谈。出现了八个主要主题,分为障碍和促进因素/策略。障碍是(1)担心艾滋病毒检测会增加护士的负担,(2)认为艾滋病毒检测不是住院患者的优先事项,(3)担心艾滋病毒检测同意不在护理实践的范围内,(4)对所需的艾滋病毒检测同意过程的错误信息,以及(5)担心冒犯患者。促进者/战略是(6)相信艾滋病毒检测对于个人健康、有益于公共健康和职业安全是必要的;(7)利用现有护理支持系统进行艾滋病毒检测的能力;(8)利用现有教育系统增加艾滋病毒检测的能力。结果表明,培养治疗团队内部和患者与护士之间的信任可以使护士在不担心负面后果的情况下获得患者同意进行艾滋病毒检测。结论:虽然护士对向所有住院患者提供艾滋病毒检测存在担忧,但现有的系统可以利用,使实施普遍的、护士驱动的艾滋病毒检测可接受和可持续;这些包括协议化;参与和信任;以及扩大艾滋病毒检测的护理倡导者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
期刊最新文献
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Nursing Activities in the Care of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-Supported Patients scale among Korean nurses: a methodological study. Development and psychometric evaluation of the DysPalKT for assessing nurses' knowledge of dyspnoea care in patients with cancer receiving palliative care. Knowledge, attitude and practice toward rational use of medications among nurses at hospitals of Dhamar city: a cross-sectional study. Mental health experiences and help-seeking behaviors among Chinese psychiatric nurses: a descriptive qualitative study. Career stress, resilience, coping, and life satisfaction among nursing students: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1