Efficacy of Neurorehabilitation Approaches in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: A Comprehensive Review.

IF 3.4 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY Life-Basel Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.3390/life15030503
Diana Andrei, Alexandra Laura Mederle, Laura Andreea Ghenciu, Claudia Borza, Alexandra Corina Faur
{"title":"Efficacy of Neurorehabilitation Approaches in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: A Comprehensive Review.","authors":"Diana Andrei, Alexandra Laura Mederle, Laura Andreea Ghenciu, Claudia Borza, Alexandra Corina Faur","doi":"10.3390/life15030503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a significant public health issue, causing long-term disabilities and imposing considerable socioeconomic and healthcare challenges. While advancements in acute care have improved survival rates, the demand for effective neurorehabilitation is increasing. This narrative review explores the evidence on neurorehabilitation strategies for TBI, focusing on interventions targeting cognitive, motor, and psychological recovery. A total of 32 studies were included and categorized into six approaches: non-invasive brain stimulation, virtual reality (VR), computer-based training, telerehabilitation, robot-assisted therapy (RAT), and mixed approaches. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), showed variable effectiveness in improving cognitive outcomes. VR-based therapies enhanced attention and executive functions, while RAT, such as Lokomat and exoskeletons, improved gait symmetry and functional mobility. Computer-assisted programs demonstrated benefits in rehabilitating social cognition and executive functions. Telerehabilitation and telephone-based treatments provided short-term gains but lacked sustained effects. Overall, cognitive improvements were better described and represented, while several motor improvements lacked consistency. Despite the promising results, significant gaps remain, including heterogeneity in methodologies, small sample sizes, and limited long-term outcome data.</p>","PeriodicalId":56144,"journal":{"name":"Life-Basel","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11944267/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/life15030503","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a significant public health issue, causing long-term disabilities and imposing considerable socioeconomic and healthcare challenges. While advancements in acute care have improved survival rates, the demand for effective neurorehabilitation is increasing. This narrative review explores the evidence on neurorehabilitation strategies for TBI, focusing on interventions targeting cognitive, motor, and psychological recovery. A total of 32 studies were included and categorized into six approaches: non-invasive brain stimulation, virtual reality (VR), computer-based training, telerehabilitation, robot-assisted therapy (RAT), and mixed approaches. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), showed variable effectiveness in improving cognitive outcomes. VR-based therapies enhanced attention and executive functions, while RAT, such as Lokomat and exoskeletons, improved gait symmetry and functional mobility. Computer-assisted programs demonstrated benefits in rehabilitating social cognition and executive functions. Telerehabilitation and telephone-based treatments provided short-term gains but lacked sustained effects. Overall, cognitive improvements were better described and represented, while several motor improvements lacked consistency. Despite the promising results, significant gaps remain, including heterogeneity in methodologies, small sample sizes, and limited long-term outcome data.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经康复方法治疗外伤性脑损伤的疗效综述。
外伤性脑损伤(TBI)是一个重大的公共卫生问题,造成长期残疾,并带来相当大的社会经济和医疗挑战。虽然急性护理的进步提高了生存率,但对有效神经康复的需求正在增加。这篇叙述性综述探讨了创伤性脑损伤的神经康复策略的证据,重点是针对认知、运动和心理恢复的干预措施。共纳入32项研究,并将其分为6种方法:无创脑刺激、虚拟现实(VR)、计算机训练、远程康复、机器人辅助治疗(RAT)和混合方法。非侵入性脑刺激技术,如经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS),在改善认知结果方面表现出不同的有效性。基于vr的疗法增强了注意力和执行功能,而RAT,如Lokomat和外骨骼,改善了步态对称性和功能流动性。计算机辅助程序在恢复社会认知和执行功能方面显示出益处。远程康复和基于电话的治疗提供了短期收益,但缺乏持续的效果。总体而言,认知方面的改善得到了更好的描述和体现,而一些运动方面的改善缺乏一致性。尽管结果令人鼓舞,但仍然存在显著的差距,包括方法的异质性、样本量小和有限的长期结果数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Life-Basel
Life-Basel Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1798
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Life (ISSN 2075-1729) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of scientific studies related to fundamental themes in Life Sciences, especially those concerned with the origins of life and evolution of biosystems. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Lateralization, Age, and Sex on Frequency Following Response in Children: Neural Speech Encoding to a 170 ms [da] Stimulus. Neutrophil Heterogeneity: Molecules to Cellular Behavior. Effects of Positive Airway Pressure Therapy on Cognitive Function in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Prospective Observational Study Protocol. Beyond the Beam: Multimodal Imaging and Surveillance of Post-Radiotherapy Changes in the Breast. Nevus Lipomatosus Superficialis with Mixed Morphologic Features: Gross, Sonographic, and Histopathologic Correlation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1