Diana Andrei, Alexandra Laura Mederle, Laura Andreea Ghenciu, Claudia Borza, Alexandra Corina Faur
{"title":"Efficacy of Neurorehabilitation Approaches in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: A Comprehensive Review.","authors":"Diana Andrei, Alexandra Laura Mederle, Laura Andreea Ghenciu, Claudia Borza, Alexandra Corina Faur","doi":"10.3390/life15030503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a significant public health issue, causing long-term disabilities and imposing considerable socioeconomic and healthcare challenges. While advancements in acute care have improved survival rates, the demand for effective neurorehabilitation is increasing. This narrative review explores the evidence on neurorehabilitation strategies for TBI, focusing on interventions targeting cognitive, motor, and psychological recovery. A total of 32 studies were included and categorized into six approaches: non-invasive brain stimulation, virtual reality (VR), computer-based training, telerehabilitation, robot-assisted therapy (RAT), and mixed approaches. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), showed variable effectiveness in improving cognitive outcomes. VR-based therapies enhanced attention and executive functions, while RAT, such as Lokomat and exoskeletons, improved gait symmetry and functional mobility. Computer-assisted programs demonstrated benefits in rehabilitating social cognition and executive functions. Telerehabilitation and telephone-based treatments provided short-term gains but lacked sustained effects. Overall, cognitive improvements were better described and represented, while several motor improvements lacked consistency. Despite the promising results, significant gaps remain, including heterogeneity in methodologies, small sample sizes, and limited long-term outcome data.</p>","PeriodicalId":56144,"journal":{"name":"Life-Basel","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11944267/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/life15030503","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a significant public health issue, causing long-term disabilities and imposing considerable socioeconomic and healthcare challenges. While advancements in acute care have improved survival rates, the demand for effective neurorehabilitation is increasing. This narrative review explores the evidence on neurorehabilitation strategies for TBI, focusing on interventions targeting cognitive, motor, and psychological recovery. A total of 32 studies were included and categorized into six approaches: non-invasive brain stimulation, virtual reality (VR), computer-based training, telerehabilitation, robot-assisted therapy (RAT), and mixed approaches. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), showed variable effectiveness in improving cognitive outcomes. VR-based therapies enhanced attention and executive functions, while RAT, such as Lokomat and exoskeletons, improved gait symmetry and functional mobility. Computer-assisted programs demonstrated benefits in rehabilitating social cognition and executive functions. Telerehabilitation and telephone-based treatments provided short-term gains but lacked sustained effects. Overall, cognitive improvements were better described and represented, while several motor improvements lacked consistency. Despite the promising results, significant gaps remain, including heterogeneity in methodologies, small sample sizes, and limited long-term outcome data.
Life-BaselBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1798
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍:
Life (ISSN 2075-1729) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of scientific studies related to fundamental themes in Life Sciences, especially those concerned with the origins of life and evolution of biosystems. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers.