Associations Between Social Determinants of Health, Allostatic Load, and Anthracycline Cardiotoxicity in a Diverse Patient Population.

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of the American Heart Association Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1161/JAHA.124.036649
Lili Zhang, Justin Song, Waqas Hanif, Rachel Clark, Magued Haroun, Mrunalini Dandamudi, Patricia Guia Simoza, Leandro Slipczuk, Mario J Garcia, Min Pu, Carlos A Gongora, Tomas G Neilan, Della F Makower, Earle C Chambers, Carlos J Rodriguez
{"title":"Associations Between Social Determinants of Health, Allostatic Load, and Anthracycline Cardiotoxicity in a Diverse Patient Population.","authors":"Lili Zhang, Justin Song, Waqas Hanif, Rachel Clark, Magued Haroun, Mrunalini Dandamudi, Patricia Guia Simoza, Leandro Slipczuk, Mario J Garcia, Min Pu, Carlos A Gongora, Tomas G Neilan, Della F Makower, Earle C Chambers, Carlos J Rodriguez","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.124.036649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allostatic load (AL) is a measurement of physiological burden of chronic stress, operationalized using a composite score derived from biomarkers from multiple physiologic systems. The relationship between AL and anthracycline cardiotoxicity is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We included consecutive adult patients who underwent anthracycline-based chemotherapy from 2016 to 2019 for any type of cancer. Patients with preexisting heart failure and lack of AL score measures were excluded from the analysis. A composite AL score was calculated using 9 biomarkers tested before initiating chemotherapy. The end point was the development of cardiotoxicity (defined as clinical heart failure or drop in left ventricular ejection fraction≥10% to <50%). A total of 718 patients were included in the analysis (29% Non-Hispanic White, 31% Non-Hispanic Black, 40% Hispanic). The mean AL score was 2.4±1.4 and it was significantly higher in Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients compared with Non-Hispanic White patients (2.5±1.3 in Non-Hispanic Black versus 2.4±1.3 in Hispanic versus 2.1±1.5 in Non-Hispanic White, <i>P</i>=0.031). In patients who developed cardiotoxicity, AL score was significantly higher than patients without cardiotoxicity (2.7±1.4 versus 2.3±1.3, <i>P</i>=0.006). AL score was independently associated with incident anthracycline cardiotoxicity after adjusting for race and ethnicity, age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors, anthracycline dose, baseline left ventricular ejection fraction, cancer type, and cancer metastasis (hazard ratio 1.20 per 1 AL score increase [95% CI, 1.02-1.43], <i>P</i>=0.033). AL score remained significantly associated with anthracycline cardiotoxicity after additional adjustment of social determinants of health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AL score can be a potential important prognostic marker in the prediction of cardiotoxicity in patients with cancer undergoing cardiotoxic treatment independent of social determinants of health.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e036649"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12132884/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.036649","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Allostatic load (AL) is a measurement of physiological burden of chronic stress, operationalized using a composite score derived from biomarkers from multiple physiologic systems. The relationship between AL and anthracycline cardiotoxicity is unclear.

Methods and results: We included consecutive adult patients who underwent anthracycline-based chemotherapy from 2016 to 2019 for any type of cancer. Patients with preexisting heart failure and lack of AL score measures were excluded from the analysis. A composite AL score was calculated using 9 biomarkers tested before initiating chemotherapy. The end point was the development of cardiotoxicity (defined as clinical heart failure or drop in left ventricular ejection fraction≥10% to <50%). A total of 718 patients were included in the analysis (29% Non-Hispanic White, 31% Non-Hispanic Black, 40% Hispanic). The mean AL score was 2.4±1.4 and it was significantly higher in Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients compared with Non-Hispanic White patients (2.5±1.3 in Non-Hispanic Black versus 2.4±1.3 in Hispanic versus 2.1±1.5 in Non-Hispanic White, P=0.031). In patients who developed cardiotoxicity, AL score was significantly higher than patients without cardiotoxicity (2.7±1.4 versus 2.3±1.3, P=0.006). AL score was independently associated with incident anthracycline cardiotoxicity after adjusting for race and ethnicity, age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors, anthracycline dose, baseline left ventricular ejection fraction, cancer type, and cancer metastasis (hazard ratio 1.20 per 1 AL score increase [95% CI, 1.02-1.43], P=0.033). AL score remained significantly associated with anthracycline cardiotoxicity after additional adjustment of social determinants of health.

Conclusions: AL score can be a potential important prognostic marker in the prediction of cardiotoxicity in patients with cancer undergoing cardiotoxic treatment independent of social determinants of health.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同患者群体中健康的社会决定因素、适应负荷和蒽环类药物心脏毒性之间的关系。
背景:适应负荷(AL)是一种测量慢性应激生理负担的方法,使用来自多个生理系统的生物标志物的综合评分来操作。AL与蒽环类药物心脏毒性的关系尚不清楚。方法和结果:我们纳入了2016年至2019年因任何类型的癌症连续接受蒽环类化疗的成年患者。先前存在心力衰竭和缺乏AL评分措施的患者被排除在分析之外。使用化疗开始前检测的9种生物标志物计算综合AL评分。终点是心脏毒性的发展(定义为临床心力衰竭或左心室射血分数下降≥10%至P=0.031)。在发生心脏毒性的患者中,AL评分明显高于无心脏毒性的患者(2.7±1.4 vs 2.3±1.3,P=0.006)。在调整种族、民族、年龄、性别、心血管危险因素、蒽环类药物剂量、基线左室射血分数、癌症类型和癌症转移后,AL评分与蒽环类药物心脏毒性事件独立相关(每增加1次AL评分的风险比为1.20 [95% CI, 1.02-1.43], P=0.033)。在对健康的社会决定因素进行额外调整后,AL评分仍与蒽环类药物心脏毒性显著相关。结论:AL评分可以作为预测接受心脏毒性治疗的癌症患者心脏毒性的潜在重要预后指标,独立于健康的社会决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Atrial Fibrillation Pattern on Edoxaban Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Secondary Analysis of the EPIC-CAD Randomized Clinical Trial. Exposure to Volatile Organic Compounds and Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. From Empirical to More Precise Correction: Multidimensional Performance Evaluation of QTc Formulas in a Cohort of Healthy Asian Youth. Incidence and Outcomes of Intraluminal Frozen Elephant Trunk Stent Graft Thrombosis After Aortic Arch Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Left Atrial Volume Index and Left Ventricular Mass Index Determine the Benefits of Spironolactone in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1