Combining Ventricular Fibrillation Features With Defibrillation Waveform Parameters Improves the Ability to Predict Shock Outcomes in a Rabbit Model of Cardiac Arrest.

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of the American Heart Association Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-27 DOI:10.1161/JAHA.124.039527
Yushun Gong, Jianjie Wang, Jingru Li, Liang Wei, Yongqin Li
{"title":"Combining Ventricular Fibrillation Features With Defibrillation Waveform Parameters Improves the Ability to Predict Shock Outcomes in a Rabbit Model of Cardiac Arrest.","authors":"Yushun Gong, Jianjie Wang, Jingru Li, Liang Wei, Yongqin Li","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.124.039527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quantitative ventricular fibrillation (VF) analysis has the potential to optimize defibrillation by predicting shock outcomes, but its performance remains unsatisfactory. This study investigated whether combining VF features with defibrillation parameters could enhance the ability of shock outcome prediction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>VF was electrically induced and left untreated for 30 to 180 seconds in 55 New Zealand rabbits. A defibrillatory shock was applied with 1 of 9 biphasic waveforms with different tilts and durations. A 4-step up-and-down protocol was used to maintain the success rate near 50% for each waveform. Ten features and 10 parameters were obtained from the recorded VF and defibrillation waveforms. Logistic regression and a convolutional neural network were used to combine VF features with defibrillation parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The area under the curve value for the combination of a single VF feature and a single defibrillation parameter (0.725 [95% CI, 0.676-0.775] versus 0.644 [95% CI, 0.589-0.699]; <i>P</i>=0.002) was significantly greater than that for the optimal VF feature. The area under the curve value for the combination of multiple VF features and multiple defibrillation parameters (0.752 [95% CI, 0.704-0.800] versus 0.657 [95% CI, 0.602-0.712]; <i>P</i><0.001) was significantly greater than that the combination of multiple VF features. The area under the curve for the combination of the raw VF waveform and raw defibrillation waveform (0.781 [95% CI, 0.734-0.828] versus 0.685 [95% CI, 0.632-0.738]; <i>P</i>=0.007) was significantly greater than that for the raw VF waveform.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this animal model, combining VF features with defibrillation parameters greatly enhanced the ability of shock outcome prediction, whether it was based on extracted features/parameters or directly using raw waveforms with machine learning methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e039527"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12132857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.039527","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Quantitative ventricular fibrillation (VF) analysis has the potential to optimize defibrillation by predicting shock outcomes, but its performance remains unsatisfactory. This study investigated whether combining VF features with defibrillation parameters could enhance the ability of shock outcome prediction.

Methods: VF was electrically induced and left untreated for 30 to 180 seconds in 55 New Zealand rabbits. A defibrillatory shock was applied with 1 of 9 biphasic waveforms with different tilts and durations. A 4-step up-and-down protocol was used to maintain the success rate near 50% for each waveform. Ten features and 10 parameters were obtained from the recorded VF and defibrillation waveforms. Logistic regression and a convolutional neural network were used to combine VF features with defibrillation parameters.

Results: The area under the curve value for the combination of a single VF feature and a single defibrillation parameter (0.725 [95% CI, 0.676-0.775] versus 0.644 [95% CI, 0.589-0.699]; P=0.002) was significantly greater than that for the optimal VF feature. The area under the curve value for the combination of multiple VF features and multiple defibrillation parameters (0.752 [95% CI, 0.704-0.800] versus 0.657 [95% CI, 0.602-0.712]; P<0.001) was significantly greater than that the combination of multiple VF features. The area under the curve for the combination of the raw VF waveform and raw defibrillation waveform (0.781 [95% CI, 0.734-0.828] versus 0.685 [95% CI, 0.632-0.738]; P=0.007) was significantly greater than that for the raw VF waveform.

Conclusions: In this animal model, combining VF features with defibrillation parameters greatly enhanced the ability of shock outcome prediction, whether it was based on extracted features/parameters or directly using raw waveforms with machine learning methods.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合心室颤动特征和除颤波形参数提高了兔心脏骤停模型中预测休克结果的能力。
背景:定量心室颤动(VF)分析有可能通过预测休克结果来优化除颤,但其性能仍不令人满意。本研究探讨将心室颤动特征与除颤参数相结合是否能增强对休克结局的预测能力。方法:55只新西兰兔电致VF,静置30 ~ 180秒。采用不同倾斜和持续时间的9种双相波形中的1种进行除颤性休克。采用4步上下方案,使每个波形的成功率保持在50%左右。从记录的心室颤振和除颤波形中获得10个特征和10个参数。采用逻辑回归和卷积神经网络结合VF特征与除颤参数。结果:单个VF特征与单个除颤参数相结合的曲线下面积值(0.725 [95% CI, 0.676-0.775] vs . 0.644 [95% CI, 0.589-0.699];P=0.002)显著大于最优VF特征。多个VF特征和多个除颤参数相结合的曲线下面积(0.752 [95% CI, 0.704-0.800] vs . 0.657 [95% CI, 0.602-0.712];PP=0.007)显著大于原始VF波形。结论:在该动物模型中,无论是基于提取的特征/参数,还是直接使用原始波形结合机器学习方法,将VF特征与除颤参数相结合,均可大大增强对休克结局的预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
期刊最新文献
Update on Education for Families and Patients With Pediatric Heart Disease: A Focus on Technological Advancements, Procedures, and Transitions of Care: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Predicting Recurrence and Outcomes After Stressor-Associated Atrial Fibrillation Using ECG-Based Deep Learning. Effect of 2 Weeks of Time-Restricted Eating on Innate Immunity and Systemic Inflammation in Patients With a History of Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized-Controlled Crossover Study. Prior Antiplatelet Exposure and Clinical Outcomes Among Korean Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction. Prognostic Impact of Elevated Pulmonary Vascular Resistance in Group 2 Pulmonary Hypertension: Insights From a Japanese Multicenter Registry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1