Establishing a Platform Method for Physical Appearance Assessment of New Parenteral Pharmaceuticals.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY AAPS Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-26 DOI:10.1208/s12248-025-01049-2
Ying Wan, Walter Wasylaschuk, Joseph Straub, Wei Xu, Nicole Lepo, Patricia M Egan, Jillian Acevedo-Skrip, Elizabeth Thoryk, Megan Mackey
{"title":"Establishing a Platform Method for Physical Appearance Assessment of New Parenteral Pharmaceuticals.","authors":"Ying Wan, Walter Wasylaschuk, Joseph Straub, Wei Xu, Nicole Lepo, Patricia M Egan, Jillian Acevedo-Skrip, Elizabeth Thoryk, Megan Mackey","doi":"10.1208/s12248-025-01049-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physical appearance (PA) is an attribute indicating the quality of parenteral pharmaceuticals. It is routinely evaluated during release and stability testing and included in regulatory filings. PA assessment of liquids involves three tests: visible particulates, clarity, and color. For each test, compendial general method chapters are available requiring minimal modification. This allows for a platform PA method approach, streamlining method readiness for new test articles. However, selecting the appropriate method is challenging, as no method suits all test articles, and pharmacopeias do not specify suitable condition(s) for each method. Improper method selection can lead to inappropriate specification setting and unreliable results. The need for guidance is especially urgent for vaccines, which often exhibit a wide range of PA attributes due to complex delivery systems and adjuvants that boost immunogenicity. This manuscript addresses this challenge by explaining method suitability and presenting a decision table for PA method selection based on the appearance properties of pharmaceuticals. A case study involving a yellow-turbid vaccine adjuvant is presented to demonstrate the practical application of the decision table. When color and turbidity make visual comparison to reference liquids difficult, instrumental clarity and visual qualitative methods are suitable options. The manuscript provides valuable insights on PA method selection and setting specifications for new parenteral pharmaceuticals. Furthermore, the decision table enables platform methods for test articles sharing similar appearance properties, eliminating the need for individual methods, reducing document preparation time for method and verification protocol, and enhancing the consistency and efficiency of GMP testing for PA.</p>","PeriodicalId":50934,"journal":{"name":"AAPS Journal","volume":"27 3","pages":"69"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-025-01049-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physical appearance (PA) is an attribute indicating the quality of parenteral pharmaceuticals. It is routinely evaluated during release and stability testing and included in regulatory filings. PA assessment of liquids involves three tests: visible particulates, clarity, and color. For each test, compendial general method chapters are available requiring minimal modification. This allows for a platform PA method approach, streamlining method readiness for new test articles. However, selecting the appropriate method is challenging, as no method suits all test articles, and pharmacopeias do not specify suitable condition(s) for each method. Improper method selection can lead to inappropriate specification setting and unreliable results. The need for guidance is especially urgent for vaccines, which often exhibit a wide range of PA attributes due to complex delivery systems and adjuvants that boost immunogenicity. This manuscript addresses this challenge by explaining method suitability and presenting a decision table for PA method selection based on the appearance properties of pharmaceuticals. A case study involving a yellow-turbid vaccine adjuvant is presented to demonstrate the practical application of the decision table. When color and turbidity make visual comparison to reference liquids difficult, instrumental clarity and visual qualitative methods are suitable options. The manuscript provides valuable insights on PA method selection and setting specifications for new parenteral pharmaceuticals. Furthermore, the decision table enables platform methods for test articles sharing similar appearance properties, eliminating the need for individual methods, reducing document preparation time for method and verification protocol, and enhancing the consistency and efficiency of GMP testing for PA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型注射用药物外观评价平台方法的建立。
外观(Physical appearance, PA)是表明注射用药物质量的一种属性。在释放和稳定性测试期间进行常规评估,并包括在监管文件中。液体的PA评估包括三个测试:可见颗粒、透明度和颜色。对于每一个测试,药典通用方法章节都是可用的,只需要很少的修改。这允许使用平台PA方法方法,简化新测试文章的方法准备。然而,选择合适的方法是具有挑战性的,因为没有一种方法适合所有的测试品,药典也没有规定每种方法的合适条件。方法选择不当会导致规格设置不当和结果不可靠。对疫苗的指导需求尤其迫切,由于复杂的递送系统和增强免疫原性的佐剂,疫苗往往表现出广泛的PA属性。本文通过解释方法适用性和提出基于药物外观特性的PA方法选择决策表来解决这一挑战。一个案例研究涉及黄混浊疫苗佐剂提出了演示决策表的实际应用。当颜色和浊度使与参比液的目视比较困难时,仪器清晰度和目视定性方法是合适的选择。手稿提供了宝贵的见解PA方法的选择和设置规范的新的注射药物。此外,决策表使测试品具有相似外观属性的平台方法成为可能,消除了对单个方法的需求,减少了方法和验证方案的文件准备时间,提高了PA GMP检测的一致性和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AAPS Journal
AAPS Journal 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
109
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The AAPS Journal, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS), publishes novel and significant findings in the various areas of pharmaceutical sciences impacting human and veterinary therapeutics, including: · Drug Design and Discovery · Pharmaceutical Biotechnology · Biopharmaceutics, Formulation, and Drug Delivery · Metabolism and Transport · Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacometrics · Translational Research · Clinical Evaluations and Therapeutic Outcomes · Regulatory Science We invite submissions under the following article types: · Original Research Articles · Reviews and Mini-reviews · White Papers, Commentaries, and Editorials · Meeting Reports · Brief/Technical Reports and Rapid Communications · Regulatory Notes · Tutorials · Protocols in the Pharmaceutical Sciences In addition, The AAPS Journal publishes themes, organized by guest editors, which are focused on particular areas of current interest to our field.
期刊最新文献
Virtual Twin-PBPK Modelling: A Step Toward Precision Dosing in Patients with Obesity. The Influence of Routes of Administration on 3-chloromethcathinone Urinary Biomarkers Disposition: Preliminary In Vivo Study of Unknown Metabolites Profiling on Healthy Volunteers. Anti-drug Antibody Validation Testing and Reporting Harmonization Addendum. Target Abundance in Pharmacological Target-Mediated Drug Disposition (TMDD) for Small Molecules - A Proteomics Approach. Assessment of Immune Responses Against AAV Encoded Transgene Products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1