Classification of Heart Failure Using Machine Learning: A Comparative Study.

IF 3.4 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY Life-Basel Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.3390/life15030496
Bryan Chulde-Fernández, Denisse Enríquez-Ortega, Cesar Guevara, Paulo Navas, Andrés Tirado-Espín, Paulina Vizcaíno-Imacaña, Fernando Villalba-Meneses, Carolina Cadena-Morejon, Diego Almeida-Galarraga, Patricia Acosta-Vargas
{"title":"Classification of Heart Failure Using Machine Learning: A Comparative Study.","authors":"Bryan Chulde-Fernández, Denisse Enríquez-Ortega, Cesar Guevara, Paulo Navas, Andrés Tirado-Espín, Paulina Vizcaíno-Imacaña, Fernando Villalba-Meneses, Carolina Cadena-Morejon, Diego Almeida-Galarraga, Patricia Acosta-Vargas","doi":"10.3390/life15030496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several machine learning classification algorithms were evaluated using a dataset focused on heart failure. Results obtained from logistic regression, random forest, decision tree, K-nearest neighbors, and multilayer perceptron (MLP) were compared to obtain the best model. The random forest method obtained specificity = 0.93, AUC = 0.97, and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) = 0.83. The accuracy was high; therefore, it was considered the best model. On the other hand, K-nearest neighbors and MLP (multi-layer perceptron) showed lower accuracy rates. These results confirm the effectiveness of the random forest method in identifying heart failure cases. This study underlines that the number of features, feature selection and quality, model type, and hyperparameter fit are also critical in these studies, as well as the importance of using machine learning techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":56144,"journal":{"name":"Life-Basel","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11944183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/life15030496","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several machine learning classification algorithms were evaluated using a dataset focused on heart failure. Results obtained from logistic regression, random forest, decision tree, K-nearest neighbors, and multilayer perceptron (MLP) were compared to obtain the best model. The random forest method obtained specificity = 0.93, AUC = 0.97, and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) = 0.83. The accuracy was high; therefore, it was considered the best model. On the other hand, K-nearest neighbors and MLP (multi-layer perceptron) showed lower accuracy rates. These results confirm the effectiveness of the random forest method in identifying heart failure cases. This study underlines that the number of features, feature selection and quality, model type, and hyperparameter fit are also critical in these studies, as well as the importance of using machine learning techniques.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用机器学习分类心力衰竭:比较研究。
使用专注于心力衰竭的数据集评估了几种机器学习分类算法。比较了逻辑回归、随机森林、决策树、k近邻和多层感知器(MLP)的结果,得到了最佳模型。随机森林法的特异性= 0.93,AUC = 0.97, Matthews相关系数(MCC) = 0.83。准确度高;因此,它被认为是最好的模型。另一方面,k近邻和MLP(多层感知器)的准确率较低。这些结果证实了随机森林方法在识别心力衰竭病例中的有效性。这项研究强调了特征的数量、特征选择和质量、模型类型和超参数拟合在这些研究中也是至关重要的,以及使用机器学习技术的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Life-Basel
Life-Basel Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1798
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Life (ISSN 2075-1729) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of scientific studies related to fundamental themes in Life Sciences, especially those concerned with the origins of life and evolution of biosystems. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers.
期刊最新文献
"Protective" Imazalil vs Its Negative Effects on Immune System Cells-Neutrophils. Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Is Independently Associated with Differential Short-Term Cutaneous Reactivity Following Standardized Topical Provocation in Humans. The Evolving Landscape of Anti-Clonal Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Systemic Light-Chain (AL) Amyloidosis: Evidence- and Time-Based Comparison with Multiple Myeloma. Diabetes Mellitus as a Risk Factor for Severe Disease and Mortality Among Patients with Melioidosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Comparison of Scrotal Orchiopexy Versus Traditional Inguinal Orchiopexy for Palpable Undescended and Retractile Testis in Children: Insights from a Greek Surgical Center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1