Fitting ambiguities mask deficiencies of the Debye–Hückel theory: revealing inconsistencies of the Poisson–Boltzmann framework and permittivity†

IF 2.9 3区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1039/D5CP00646E
Benjamin Janotta, Maximilian Schalenbach, Hermann Tempel and Rüdiger-A. Eichel
{"title":"Fitting ambiguities mask deficiencies of the Debye–Hückel theory: revealing inconsistencies of the Poisson–Boltzmann framework and permittivity†","authors":"Benjamin Janotta, Maximilian Schalenbach, Hermann Tempel and Rüdiger-A. Eichel","doi":"10.1039/D5CP00646E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The more than 100-year-old Debye–Hückel theory displays the most widely used approach for modeling ionic activities in electrolytes. The Debye–Hückel theory finds widespread application, such as in equations of state and Onsager's theory for conductivities. Here, a theoretical inconsistency of the Debye–Hückel theory is discussed, which originates from the employed Poisson–Boltzmann framework that violates the statistical independence of states presumed for the Boltzmann statistics. Furthermore, the static permittivity of electrolytic solutions is discussed as not directly measurable, while common methods for its extraction from experimental data are assessed as erroneous. A sensitivity analysis of modeled activity coefficients with respect to the permittivity and ionic radii as input parameters is conducted, showing that their influences overshadow physicochemical differences of common variations of Debye–Hückel models. Eventually, this study points out that the justification of the traditional and still often used Debye–Hückel models by experimental validation is affected by fitting ambiguities that eventually impede its predictive capabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":99,"journal":{"name":"Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics","volume":" 15","pages":" 7703-7715"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/cp/d5cp00646e?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/cp/d5cp00646e","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The more than 100-year-old Debye–Hückel theory displays the most widely used approach for modeling ionic activities in electrolytes. The Debye–Hückel theory finds widespread application, such as in equations of state and Onsager's theory for conductivities. Here, a theoretical inconsistency of the Debye–Hückel theory is discussed, which originates from the employed Poisson–Boltzmann framework that violates the statistical independence of states presumed for the Boltzmann statistics. Furthermore, the static permittivity of electrolytic solutions is discussed as not directly measurable, while common methods for its extraction from experimental data are assessed as erroneous. A sensitivity analysis of modeled activity coefficients with respect to the permittivity and ionic radii as input parameters is conducted, showing that their influences overshadow physicochemical differences of common variations of Debye–Hückel models. Eventually, this study points out that the justification of the traditional and still often used Debye–Hückel models by experimental validation is affected by fitting ambiguities that eventually impede its predictive capabilities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拟合的模糊性掩盖了debye - h ckel理论的缺陷:揭示了泊松-玻尔兹曼框架和介电常数的不一致性
100多年前的debye - h ckel理论显示了最广泛使用的模拟电解质离子活性的方法。debye - hckel理论得到了广泛的应用,例如在状态方程和Onsager的电导率理论中。本文讨论了debye - h ckel理论的理论不一致性,这种不一致性源于所采用的泊松-玻尔兹曼框架违反了玻尔兹曼统计假定的状态的统计独立性。此外,讨论了电解溶液的静态介电常数是不可直接测量的,而从实验数据中提取它的常用方法被认为是错误的。模拟活度系数对介电常数和离子半径作为输入参数的敏感性分析表明,它们的影响掩盖了debye - h ckel模型常见变化的物理化学差异。最后,本研究指出,传统的和仍然经常使用的debye - h ckel模型通过实验验证的正当性受到拟合歧义的影响,最终阻碍了其预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 化学-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
2675
审稿时长
2.0 months
期刊介绍: Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions. The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.
期刊最新文献
DFT insights into metal-functionalized black phosphorene as a potential volatile organic compound sensor for early cancer detection Towards Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Membrane-Targeting Photosensitizing Antivirals HONO, a key sink of Isoprene-derived Criegee Intermediates (MACR-oxide and MVK-oxide) Spontaneous generation of hydrogen from water using modified dodecaborate ions Conductivity of electrolyte solutions: self-consistent Debye–Hückel–Onsager theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1